AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX vs Intel Core 5 221TE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX

CORE STATE Fire Range
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 64 MB
MAX TDP 55W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 221TE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.8 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
662,381
156,682
passmark_data_encryption
32,139
8,963
passmark_extended_instructions
53,817
9,655
passmark_find_prime_numbers
323
59
passmark_floating_point_math
115,062
31,661
passmark_integer_math
172,943
42,303
passmark_multithread
51,722
13,301
passmark_physics
3,054
977
passmark_random_string_sorting
70,175
16,929
passmark_single_thread
4,461
1,734
passmark_singlethread
4,461
1,734
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
1,139
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
160
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
4,748
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
670
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
11,305
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
1,596

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX vs Intel Core 5 221TE

The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX and the Intel Core 5 221TE occupy different corners of the processor market, and the benchmark data reflects a substantial performance gap between them. The Ryzen 9 9850HX is a high-end mobile part, while the Core 5 221TE is a desktop processor aimed at more modest workloads. The recorded scores show a clear hierarchy, with the AMD chip dominating every single measured category.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data from the database shows a complete sweep for the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX across all 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The most dominant win for the AMD chip comes in the extended instructions test, where it scores 53,817 compared to the Intel part's 9,655, a delta of 457.4%. This indicates a massive advantage in workloads that utilize advanced CPU instruction sets, such as AES encryption and SHA hashing.

Another massive gap appears in the find prime numbers test, a pure calculation of integer performance. The Ryzen 9 9850HX scores 323, while the Core 5 221TE scores 59, a delta of 447.5%. This near-identical percentage to the extended instructions win suggests that the AMD architecture is fundamentally more efficient at executing raw mathematical operations.

The data compression test also shows a huge difference. The AMD processor scores 662,381 versus the Intel's 156,682, a delta of 322.8%. This is the largest absolute point difference in the entire comparison, and it directly impacts file archiving and database workloads. The integer math test follows a similar pattern, with the AMD chip scoring 172,943 against the Intel's 42,303, a delta of 308.8%.

The random string sorting test, which measures memory subsystem efficiency and core scheduling, shows a 314.5% delta in favor of the AMD part, with scores of 70,175 and 16,929. The multithread score, a general indicator of parallel processing capability, is 51,722 for the AMD chip versus 13,301 for the Intel, a delta of 288.9%. This confirms that the Ryzen 9 9850HX delivers more than three times the throughput in heavily threaded applications.

The floating point math test shows a 263.4% delta, with the AMD scoring 115,062 and the Intel scoring 31,661. Data encryption also favors the AMD chip heavily, with a score of 32,139 versus 8,963, a delta of 258.6%. Even the physics test, which simulates rigid body interactions, shows a 212.6% delta in favor of the AMD, with scores of 3,054 and 977.

The smallest margin of victory, though still substantial, is in the single thread tests. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX scores 4,461, while the Intel Core 5 221TE scores 1,734, a delta of 157.3%. This indicates that even in lightly threaded tasks, the AMD processor holds a commanding lead.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the benchmark wins, the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX is the clear choice for any workload that demands raw computational power. Its 11 wins out of 11 comparisons show that it is superior in data compression, encryption, extended instruction sets, prime number calculations, floating point math, integer math, multithreaded tasks, physics simulations, random string sorting, and single-threaded performance. The data suggests this processor is designed for high-performance computing, content creation, and any application that can utilize its 12 cores and 24 threads.

The Intel Core 5 221TE does not have a single benchmark win in this comparison. However, its recorded data shows it is a capable processor in its own right, with a Passmark single thread score of 1,734 and a multithread score of 13,301. Its average benchmark score of 17,860 places it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs, which indicates it performs better than the majority of processors in the database. The Intel chip is likely suited for general desktop use, office productivity, and light content creation, where its 10 cores and 16 threads provide adequate performance for everyday tasks.

The AMD chip's percentile ranking of 97 versus the Intel's 71 further contextualizes the gap. The Ryzen 9 9850HX sits near the top of the overall CPU performance distribution, while the Core 5 221TE sits in the upper-middle range. The nearest rivals for the AMD chip are workstation-class Xeon processors, with the Intel Xeon w7-3555 just 0.2% behind and the Intel Xeon 6521P 0.5% behind. The AMD chip also leads the AMD EPYC 8324P by 3%. The Intel Core 5 221TE, by contrast, trades blows with older mainstream parts like the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT (-0.2%) and the Intel Core 5 120U (-0.2%), while leading the Intel Core 7 350 by 0.5%.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX uses the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Fire Range, and is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 16,630 million transistors spread across two chiplets, each with a die size of 70.6 mm². The Intel Core 5 221TE uses the Bartlett Lake architecture and is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a single die size of 215 mm².

The core configurations differ significantly. The AMD chip has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel chip has 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD chip's base clock is 3.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the Intel chip runs at a base clock of 1.80 GHz and boosts to 5.00 GHz. The AMD chip has a TDP of 55 watts, while the Intel chip has a TDP of 45 watts.

Cache layouts also diverge. Both chips have an L1 cache of 80 KB per core. The AMD chip has 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel chip has a slightly larger 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache shows a major difference: the AMD chip has 64 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel chip has 24 MB. This larger cache pool likely contributes to the AMD chip's superior performance in data-intensive tasks.

Memory support differentiates the two as well. The AMD chip supports only DDR5 memory, running on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also on a dual-channel bus, but with a lower bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD chip offers PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, while the Intel chip offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

The integrated graphics are also different. The AMD chip uses a Radeon 610M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD chip is unlocked, meaning its multiplier can be adjusted, while the Intel chip is locked. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FL1 and is classified as a mobile processor, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700 and is classified as a desktop processor.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-threaded benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX scores 4,461 in the Passmark single thread test, while the Intel Core 5 221TE scores 1,734, a delta of 157.3% in favor of the AMD chip.

Q: What is the difference in multithreaded performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX scores 51,722 in the Passmark multithread test, while the Intel Core 5 221TE scores 13,301, a delta of 288.9% in favor of the AMD chip.

Q: How do their cache sizes compare?

A: The AMD chip has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 64 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel chip has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of L3 cache.

Q: What process nodes are they manufactured on?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core 5 221TE is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: Which processor supports a wider range of memory types?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX supports only DDR5 memory.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX has an average benchmark score of 106,413, while the Intel Core 5 221TE has an average benchmark score of 17,860.

The Verdict

The data presents an unambiguous outcome. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX is the superior processor in every measured benchmark category, with deltas ranging from 157.3% in single-threaded tasks to 457.4% in extended instructions. Its average benchmark score of 106,413 places it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals are high-end Xeon workstation processors. This chip is designed for demanding workloads, and the benchmark results confirm that it delivers exceptional performance across the board.

The Intel Core 5 221TE, while not competitive with the AMD chip, is a serviceable desktop processor. Its average benchmark score of 17,860 and 71st percentile ranking show that it holds its own against older mainstream processors like the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT and the Intel Core 5 120U. With a 45 watt TDP and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, it offers flexibility for system builders. However, its 10 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 24 MB L3 cache, limit its capability in heavily threaded applications.

For users selecting between these two, the choice depends entirely on the required performance level. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX is the option for those who need maximum computational throughput, as evidenced by its 11 wins and massive percentage leads. The Intel Core 5 221TE is the option for those who need a standard desktop processor for everyday tasks, as its performance profile and 71st percentile ranking suggest it handles typical workloads without issue. The database shows no scenario where the Intel chip outperforms the AMD chip, so the Ryzen 9 9850HX is the definitive pick for performance-oriented users.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
9 9850HX
5 221TE
Core Specs
Cores
12
10 -16.7%
Threads
24
16 -33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
3
1.8 -40.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
5 -3.8%
Frequency (GHz)
3
1.8 -40.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
5 -3.8%
Multiplier
30
18 -40.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
64 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
55
45 -18.2%
PL1
—
45 W
PL2
—
106 W
PPT
61-101 W
—
Configurable TDP
45-75 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
—
Codename
Fire Range
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 9 (Zen 5 (Fire Range))
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
16,630 million
—
Die Size
2x 70.6 mm²
215 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FL1
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 5, 28 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
—
1300 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 610M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$232
Part Number
100-000001366
SRVQS
Package
µFC-BGAFL1
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
—
View Ryzen 9 9850HX Details View Core 5 221TE Details