AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX vs Intel Core 5 211TE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX and Intel Core 5 211TE occupy different tiers in the database, and the benchmark data confirms a substantial performance gap between them. The Ryzen 9 9850HX records an average benchmark score of 106413, placing it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 5 211TE averages 15370, which lands in the 69th percentile. The head-to-head results show the AMD processor winning all 11 recorded comparisons, with the largest margins appearing in compute-intensive workloads.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive victory for the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX comes in the PassMark extended instructions test, where it scores 53817 against the Intel Core 5 211TE’s 8615, a delta of 524.7%. This workload, which exercises advanced and specialized instruction sets, shows the architectural advantage of the Zen 5 design in handling complex operations. Similarly, integer math performance heavily favors the AMD chip: 172943 versus 33991, a 408.8% advantage. Data compression also shows a massive divide, with the Ryzen 9 9850HX scoring 662381 compared to 133434, a 396.4% delta.

In floating-point math, the AMD processor delivers 115062 points against 26150 for the Intel part, a 340% difference. The multithreaded PassMark score follows the same pattern: 51722 for the Ryzen 9 9850HX versus 11685 for the Core 5 211TE, a 342.6% delta. This result aligns with the core and thread counts, as the AMD chip provides 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel processor offers 10 cores and 16 threads. The single-threaded test shows a narrower but still significant gap: 4461 versus 1408, a 216.8% delta. This indicates that the Ryzen 9 9850HX holds a strong lead not only in parallel workloads but also in lightly threaded tasks.

Random string sorting, which stresses memory access patterns and pointer chasing, gives the AMD processor a 372.9% edge with a score of 70175 against 14838. Prime number finding, a test that relies heavily on integer throughput, shows 323 versus 72, a 348.6% delta. Data encryption results in 32139 for the Ryzen 9 9850HX and 7231 for the Core 5 211TE, a 344.5% advantage. The physics test, which simulates rigid body dynamics, delivers the smallest relative margin of the set at 139%, with scores of 3054 and 1278. Even at its lowest relative advantage, the AMD part still more than doubles the Intel processor’s output.

The nearest rival data for each chip puts these margins in context. The Ryzen 9 9850HX sits within 0.2% of the Intel Xeon w7-3555 and 0.5% of the Intel Xeon 6521P, and it runs 2.1% behind the Intel Xeon w7-2595X while leading the AMD EPYC 8324P by 3%. The Core 5 211TE, by contrast, is 0.7% behind the AMD EPYC 7543 and 2% behind the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U, while leading the AMD EPYC 7702P by 1.6% and the Intel Core i3-1315U by 2.3%. These comparisons show that the Ryzen 9 9850HX competes in workstation-class territory, whereas the Core 5 211TE aligns with mid-range desktop and mobile parts.

FAQ

Q: How large is the performance gap between the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX and the Intel Core 5 211TE?

A: The AMD processor wins all 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The smallest margin is 139% in the physics test, while the largest is 524.7% in extended instructions. The average benchmark score for the Ryzen 9 9850HX is 106413, compared to 15370 for the Core 5 211TE.

Q: Which processor has better single-threaded performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX scores 4461 in the PassMark single-thread test, while the Intel Core 5 211TE scores 1408. This gives the AMD part a 216.8% advantage in single-threaded workloads.

Q: How do the two chips compare in multithreaded workloads?

A: The Ryzen 9 9850HX records a PassMark multithread score of 51722, which is 342.6% higher than the Core 5 211TE’s 11685. The AMD processor has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel processor has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What are the closest competitors to each processor according to the database?

A: The Ryzen 9 9850HX’s nearest rival is the Intel Xeon w7-3555 with a 0.2% delta. The Core 5 211TE’s nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 7543 with a 0.7% delta in favor of the EPYC.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 211TE boosts to 4.80 GHz. The base clocks are 3.00 GHz for the AMD part and 1.70 GHz for the Intel part.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX and the Intel Core 5 211TE support ECC memory. Both also use dual-channel memory configurations, though the AMD part supports DDR5 only while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design families. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Fire Range codename and belongs to the 9000 series. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 16,630 million transistors and a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The Intel Core 5 211TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is built on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 215 mm². The process node difference is substantial, and the data shows the impact in both power characteristics and performance output.

Cache organization differs between the two. Both processors allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the AMD chip and 1.25 MB per core on the Intel chip. The L3 cache, however, favors AMD heavily: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 9850HX versus 20 MB shared on the Core 5 211TE. This larger last-level cache likely contributes to the AMD processor’s commanding leads in data compression and random string sorting, workloads that benefit from larger working sets being held on-die.

Memory support also separates the two. The AMD processor supports DDR5 exclusively with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus with 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Both support ECC memory, which positions them for workstation and server-adjacent tasks. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the Ryzen 9 9850HX provides Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, while the Core 5 211TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The AMD part also has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel part is locked.

The integrated graphics are distinct: the Ryzen 9 9850HX uses Radeon 610M, and the Core 5 211TE uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD processor targets the mobile market segment on AMD Socket FL1, while the Intel processor is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700. The Ryzen 9 9850HX was released on January 5, 2025, and the Core 5 211TE on January 12, 2025. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates a decisive performance hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX wins all 11 head-to-head tests and holds a 97th percentile ranking, with an average score of 106413 that places it alongside Intel Xeon workstation processors. Its 12 cores, 24 threads, 64 MB of L3 cache, and 5.20 GHz boost clock produce results that are 139% to 524.7% ahead of the Intel Core 5 211TE depending on the workload. The Core 5 211TE, with its 69th percentile ranking and average score of 15370, aligns with lower-tier server and mid-range mobile parts such as the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U and Intel Core i3-1315U.

For workloads that demand high throughput in integer math, floating-point math, data compression, and encryption, the Ryzen 9 9850HX is the clear choice based on the benchmark data. Its nearest rivals are all Xeon or EPYC processors, confirming that it operates in a different performance class. The Intel Core 5 211TE, while a capable desktop processor with ECC support and dual memory technology compatibility, does not approach the AMD part’s output in any recorded test. The only areas where the Intel chip shows comparative proximity are the physics test, where the delta drops to 139%, and single-threaded performance, where the delta is 216.8%. Even in those cases, the AMD processor holds a substantial lead.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 3.00 GHz for the AMD part and 1.70 GHz for the Intel part. Boost clocks are 5.20 GHz and 4.80 GHz, respectively. Thermal design power is 55 watts for the AMD processor and 45 watts for the Intel processor.

The socket and platform differ completely: AMD Socket FL1 versus Intel Socket 1700. The process nodes are 4 nm at TSMC for AMD and 10 nm at Intel for the Intel part. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier; the Intel chip does not. L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the AMD processor and 1.25 MB per core on the Intel processor. L3 cache is 64 MB on the AMD processor and 20 MB shared on the Intel processor. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for the AMD part and 76.8 GB/s for the Intel part. PCIe lane counts from the CPU are 28 for the AMD part and 16 for the Intel part. The AMD processor supports only DDR5, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5.