AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and Intel Core i5-14401TE occupy very different positions in the database. The Ryzen 9 7940HX holds a 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the Core i5-14401TE sits at the 50th percentile. The direct head-to-head benchmark set is empty, so the comparison relies on the recorded scores for the AMD part and the architectural characteristics of the Intel part.

The Ryzen 9 7940HX delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 and a single-core score of 1807. In PassMark multithread testing, it records 53204, with single-thread performance at 3942. The 3DMark results show a progression from 1027 in single-thread testing to 13447 at maximum threads. These figures place the AMD chip firmly in high-end territory.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and it has no nearest rivals. This makes a direct numeric comparison impossible. The data suggests the Intel part is positioned for a different workload profile entirely, one where raw benchmark output is not the primary metric.

Without recorded Intel scores, the analysis shifts to what the database does provide: the AMD part's scores against its nearest rivals. The Ryzen 9 7940HX averages 69875 across all benchmarks. Its closest competitor, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, averages 69996, a delta of -0.2%. The Intel Core i7-14700KF averages 70163, a delta of -0.4%. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X averages 69515, putting the 7940HX ahead by 0.5%. The Intel Core i7-14700K averages 69355, with the 7940HX ahead by 0.7%.

The Ryzen 9 7940HX also shows strong results in specialized PassMark tests. Data compression scores 693741, encryption scores 41974, and extended instructions score 51029. Floating point math records 121383, integer math records 202883, and prime number finding scores 273. Random string sorting completes at 81775. Physics testing shows 2297.

These numbers indicate the AMD processor is balanced across workload types. The encryption and compression figures suggest strong sustained throughput. The floating point and integer math scores confirm broad computational capability. The single-thread score of 3942 in PassMark is respectable, though the multicore results are where the chip distinguishes itself.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7940HX compare to its closest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The database shows an average score of 69875 for the Ryzen 9 7940HX. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70163 (0.4% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515 (0.5% lower), and the Intel Core i7-14700K scores 69355 (0.7% lower).

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What process nodes do the two chips use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX uses a 5 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14401TE uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX has a TDP of 55 watts. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX supports DDR5 only. The Intel Core i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the L3 cache capacity for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX has 64 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear separation in intended use. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is a high-core-count mobile processor aimed at demanding multi-threaded workloads. Its 94th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 69875 place it among the top performers in the database. The Intel Core i5-14401TE, with no recorded benchmarks and a 50th percentile ranking, appears designed for efficient desktop operation where low power and moderate performance are sufficient.

For users processing heavy workloads such as rendering, compilation, or scientific computation, the Ryzen 9 7940HX offers 16 cores and 32 threads. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 and PassMark multithread score of 53204 confirm strong parallel performance. The 64 MB of L3 cache further supports data-intensive tasks.

For users with lighter workloads, the Core i5-14401TE provides 6 cores and 12 threads with a 45 watt TDP. Its support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory and ECC memory capability suggest a focus on stability and flexibility rather than raw speed. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 handles basic display output.

The Ryzen 9 7940HX targets the mobile segment with a 55 watt TDP and AMD Socket FL1. The Core i5-14401TE targets desktop with Intel Socket 1700. These are fundamentally different platforms. The choice depends on the required performance level and platform constraints.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 2.40 GHz for the AMD part and 2.00 GHz for the Intel part. Boost clocks reach 5.20 GHz on the AMD and 4.50 GHz on the Intel.

The AMD chip uses a 5 nm process from TSMC with a die size of 2x 71 mm². The Intel chip uses a 10 nm process from Intel with a die size of 215 mm². The AMD part has 13,140 million transistors; the Intel part has no transistor count recorded.

L1 cache is 64 KB per core on the AMD and 80 KB per core on the Intel. L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the AMD and 1.25 MB per core on the Intel. L3 cache is 64 MB on the AMD and 20 MB shared on the Intel.

Memory support differs: the AMD chip uses DDR5 only, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is 83.2 GB/s for the AMD part; the Intel part has no bandwidth figure recorded. ECC memory is false for the AMD and true for the Intel.

PCIe lanes are 28 on the AMD and 16 on the Intel, both Gen 5. Integrated graphics are Radeon 610M on the AMD and UHD Graphics 730 on the Intel. The market segment is Mobile for AMD and Desktop for Intel. The AMD multiplier is unlocked; the Intel multiplier is locked.

Release dates differ by several months. The AMD part launched on 2024-01-16, and the Intel part on 2024-06-30. Part numbers are 100-000001486 for AMD and Q4T4SRNJP for Intel.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX uses Zen 4 architecture with the codename Dragon Range. This is a chiplet design with two 71 mm² dies. The 5 nm TSMC process allows for 16 cores in a 55 watt envelope. The architecture supports 64 MB of L3 cache and a dual-channel DDR5 memory bus with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE uses Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R. This is a monolithic 215 mm² die on Intel's 10 nm process. The architecture uses a hybrid design, though specific core type breakdowns are not recorded in the database. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

The AMD architecture integrates Radeon 610M graphics and provides 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The Intel architecture integrates UHD Graphics 730 and provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking; the Intel chip is locked.

ECC memory support is a notable difference. The Intel part supports ECC, the AMD part does not. This suggests the Intel chip may target reliability-sensitive environments. The AMD part's higher core count and larger cache target performance-sensitive workloads.

The transistor count of 13,140 million on the AMD part reflects the chiplet approach. The Intel part's transistor count is not recorded. The process node difference of 5 nm versus 10 nm contributes to the power and density characteristics of each design.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX wins in multi-threaded performance. Its 16 cores and 32 threads produce a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 and a PassMark multithread score of 53204. The 64 MB of L3 cache supports workloads with large working sets. Data compression at 693741 and encryption at 41974 in PassMark indicate strong throughput in these areas.

The AMD part also wins in single-thread performance based on the available data. Its PassMark single-thread score of 3942 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1807 represent solid per-core capability. The 5.20 GHz boost clock supports this.

The AMD part wins in memory bandwidth with 83.2 GB/s. Its PCIe Gen 5 implementation with 28 lanes provides more expansion capacity than the Intel part's 16 lanes.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE wins in power efficiency, with a 45 watt TDP compared to 55 watts for the AMD part. The lower core count and clock speeds contribute to this. The Intel part also wins in memory flexibility, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5.

The Intel part wins in ECC support, which the AMD part lacks. This makes it suitable for error-sensitive applications. The Intel part uses a desktop socket, while the AMD part uses a mobile socket, giving it a different platform fit.

The Intel part's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for basic productivity and light multi-tasking. Its 20 MB of shared L3 cache is smaller but adequate for its workload profile. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides display output without a discrete GPU.

The AMD part's 94th percentile ranking versus the Intel part's 50th percentile ranking summarizes the performance gap. The AMD part competes with the Ryzen 7 9700F, Core i7-14700KF, Ryzen 9 7950X, and Core i7-14700K according to the nearest rivals data. The Intel part has no listed rivals in the database, reinforcing its position as a lower-performance option.

For mobile workstations and high-end laptops, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX delivers. For desktop systems prioritizing low power, memory flexibility, and ECC support, the Intel Core i5-14401TE fits. The benchmark data supports this split without ambiguity.