AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core 5 320 Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

CORE STATE Dragon Range
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 64 MB
MAX TDP 55W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 320

CORE STATE Wildcat Lake
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 6 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.5 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 6 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 15W
ARCHITECTURE Wildcat Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_16_threads
12,501
N/A
3dmark_2_threads
2,001
N/A
3dmark_4_threads
3,844
N/A
3dmark_8_threads
7,158
N/A
3dmark_max_threads
13,447
N/A
3dmark_single_thread
1,027
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
29,400
6,197
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,807
1,926
passmark_data_compression
693,741
148,779
passmark_data_encryption
41,974
10,984
passmark_extended_instructions
51,029
13,262
passmark_find_prime_numbers
273
110
passmark_floating_point_math
121,383
42,440
passmark_integer_math
202,883
32,323
passmark_multithread
53,204
15,450
passmark_physics
2,297
1,221
passmark_random_string_sorting
81,775
18,038
passmark_single_thread
3,942
4,045
passmark_singlethread
3,942
4,045
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
1,054
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
276
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
5,462
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
771

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX vs Intel Core 5 320

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive overall victory for the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, which claims 10 benchmark wins against 3 for the Intel Core 5 320. The most dramatic gap appears in PassMark integer math, where the AMD part scores 202,883 against 32,323, a margin of 527.7%. This test measures raw arithmetic throughput, and the 16-core, 32-thread configuration of the AMD processor simply overwhelms the 6-core, 6-thread Intel part.

Multi-threaded rendering follows the same pattern. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX records 29,400 points versus 6,197 for the Intel Core 5 320, a 374.4% advantage. That result places the AMD chip in a completely different performance class for heavily threaded workloads. Data compression shows a similar story, with the AMD part scoring 693,741 against 148,779, a 366.3% lead. Encryption workloads also favor AMD heavily, with 41,974 versus 10,984, a 282.1% difference.

The gap narrows somewhat in floating-point math, where AMD leads by 186% (121,383 versus 42,440), and in prime number finding, where the lead is 148.2% (273 versus 110). Random string sorting shows a 353.3% advantage for AMD (81,775 versus 18,038), while extended instructions favor AMD by 284.8% (51,029 versus 13,262). The PassMark multi-thread score confirms the overall pattern: 53,204 for AMD versus 15,450 for Intel, a 244.4% lead.

The Intel Core 5 320 wins the single-threaded contests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 1,926 against 1,807 for AMD, a 6.2% advantage. PassMark single-thread results show a narrower lead for Intel, 4,045 versus 3,942, a 2.5% difference. These are the only three wins for Intel, and they all come from tests that exercise a single core. The physics test shows a smaller AMD lead at 88.1% (2,297 versus 1,221), which still counts as a decisive win but represents the closest multi-threaded margin.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Dragon Range codename, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 13,140 million transistors across a die size of 2x 71 mm². The Intel Core 5 320 uses the Wildcat Lake codename, built on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. No transistor count or die size data exists for the Intel part in the database.

Core counts differ dramatically. The AMD processor offers 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel part provides 6 cores and 6 threads. This means the AMD chip has no simultaneous multi-threading overhead for the Intel part to exploit; it simply has more than double the physical cores and more than five times the thread count. Clock speeds also differ, with AMD boosting to 5.20 GHz from a 2.40 GHz base, while Intel boosts to 4.60 GHz from a 1.50 GHz base.

Cache hierarchies reflect the core count disparity. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 320 has 192 KB of L1 total, 2.5 MB of L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. This gives the AMD part a substantial cache advantage for workloads that fit within the larger pools.

Memory architecture also diverges. The AMD processor supports DDR5 over a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X but uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s. Neither processor supports ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs as well, with AMD offering Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, while Intel provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes.

Integrated graphics present another contrast. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX includes Radeon 610M graphics, while the Intel Core 5 320 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the Intel chip is locked. Production status is active for both, but their release dates differ substantially, with AMD launching in January 2024 and Intel in April 2026.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX dominates every multi-threaded benchmark in the comparison set. This includes rendering, compression, encryption, extended instruction workloads, prime number calculation, floating-point math, integer math, physics simulation, and random string sorting. The data indicates that any application which can utilize more than a few cores will see a massive advantage from the AMD processor. The 374.4% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and the 527.7% lead in integer math are not incremental improvements; they represent a different performance tier entirely.

The Intel Core 5 320 wins only in single-threaded tests. Its 6.2% advantage in Cinebench R23 single-core and 2.5% lead in PassMark single-thread suggest that its high boost clock of 4.60 GHz, combined with a 3 nm process, delivers slightly better performance when only one core is active. This matters for lightly threaded applications, legacy software, and responsive single-threaded tasks. However, the margin is modest compared to the multi-threaded gaps.

The practical split is clear. For workloads that scale across cores, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is the superior choice by a wide margin. For single-threaded responsiveness, the Intel Core 5 320 has a measurable but small edge. The AMD chip's 94th percentile against all CPUs, compared to Intel's 72nd percentile, reinforces the overall performance ranking. The average benchmark score tells the same story: 69,875 for AMD versus 18,023 for Intel.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field recorded in the database. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX belongs to the 7000 series with a Ryzen 9 generation label and Zen 4 architecture, while the Intel Core 5 320 carries a Core 5 generation label with no architecture field recorded. Core and thread counts differ at 16/32 versus 6/6. Base clocks are 2.40 GHz versus 1.50 GHz, and boost clocks are 5.20 GHz versus 4.60 GHz.

Thermal design power shows a substantial gap, with the AMD part rated at 55 watts and the Intel part at 15 watts. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FL1, while Intel uses BGA 1516. Process nodes differ at 5 nm for AMD versus 3 nm for Intel, with different foundries (TSMC versus Intel). The AMD part carries 13,140 million transistors across 2x 71 mm² dies; no equivalent data exists for Intel.

Cache configurations differ in both size and structure. AMD provides per-core L1 and L2 caches (64 KB and 1 MB respectively) with a 64 MB L3. Intel provides a total of 192 KB L1, 2.5 MB L2, and 6 MB shared L3. Memory support differs with AMD offering only DDR5 on dual-channel, while Intel supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X on single-channel. Memory bandwidth is 83.2 GB/s for AMD versus 59.7 GB/s for Intel. PCIe generation and lane counts differ at Gen 5/28 for AMD versus Gen 4/6 for Intel.

Integrated graphics differ in brand and configuration, with AMD using Radeon 610M and Intel using Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The AMD multiplier is unlocked, the Intel is not. Part numbers are 100-000001486 for AMD and SAE3H for Intel. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $340, while no launch MSRP exists for the AMD part.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core 5 320 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 29,400 compared to 6,197 for the Intel Core 5 320, a 374.4% advantage.

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 320 win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, it wins three tests: Cinebench R23 single-core (1,926 versus 1,807, a 6.2% lead) and both PassMark single-thread tests (4,045 versus 3,942, a 2.5% lead).

Q: What are the memory bandwidth specifications for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX provides 83.2 GB/s over a dual-channel DDR5 bus. The Intel Core 5 320 provides 59.7 GB/s over a single-channel bus supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 320 boosts to 4.60 GHz.

Q: How do the processors compare in overall benchmark percentile?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX ranks in the 94th percentile against all CPUs, while the Intel Core 5 320 ranks in the 72nd percentile. The average benchmark scores are 69,875 for AMD and 18,023 for Intel.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
9 7940HX
5 320
Core Specs
Cores
16
6 -62.5%
Threads
32
6 -81.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.4
1.5 -37.5%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
4.6 -11.5%
Frequency (GHz)
2.4
1.5 -37.5%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
4.6 -11.5%
Multiplier
24
15 -37.5%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2.5 MB
L3 Cache
64 MB
6 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
55
15 -72.7%
Configurable TDP
55-75 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Codename
Dragon Range
Wildcat Lake
Generation
Ryzen 9 (Zen 4 (Dragon Range))
Core 5 (Wildcat Lake)
Process Size
5 nm
3 nm
Transistors
13,140 million
Die Size
2x 71 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5, LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Single-channel
Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
59.7 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
No
DDR5 Speed
6400 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FL1
Intel BGA 1516
PCIe
Gen 5, 28 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 6 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 2 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1400 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 16 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 610M
Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe)
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$340
Part Number
100-000001486
SAE3H
Package
µFC-BGAFL1
FC-BGA
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen 9 7940HX Details View Core 5 320 Details