AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Intel Xeon E-2274G Comparison

The Verdict

The benchmark data separates these two processors by workload type rather than overall capability. The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS wins three of the four recorded head-to-head tests, with decisive margins in multi-threaded and single-threaded Cinebench tests, plus a strong Geekbench multi-core result. The Intel Xeon E-2274G takes only one test, Geekbench single-core, but does so with a 21% advantage. The Ryzen 9 4900HS is the clear choice for rendering, compilation, or any workload that scales with core count, given its 8 cores and 16 threads against the Xeon's 4 cores and 8 threads. The Xeon E-2274G remains relevant for lightly threaded tasks where raw per-core speed matters, particularly in Geekbench-style workloads. Both processors sit at the 49th percentile among all CPUs in the database, meaning they occupy the same tier of overall performance despite their architectural differences. The Ryzen 9 4900HS carries a TDP of 35 watts versus the Xeon's 83 watts, making it the more efficient option for sustained mobile workloads. The Xeon's advantage lies in its 4.90 GHz boost clock and ECC memory support, features that appeal to workstation environments where data integrity outweighs raw throughput.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Xeon E-2274G uses the Coffee Lake architecture, specifically the Coffee Lake-S WS variant, built on Intel's 14 nm process. It features 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The die measures 126 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Xeon supports DDR4 memory over a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. It includes HD Graphics P630 as integrated graphics and supports ECC memory, a critical feature for server and workstation reliability. The processor uses Intel Socket 1151 and provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Its production status is listed as end-of-life, with a release date of May 28, 2019.

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS uses the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Renoir, built on TSMC's 7 nm process. It houses 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The die size is 156 mm², and it integrates 9,800 million transistors. Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR4 over a dual-channel bus with a higher bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The integrated graphics are Radeon Graphics 512SP. ECC memory is not supported. The chip uses AMD Socket FP6, which is a mobile socket, and its market segment is explicitly mobile. It remains in active production, with a release date of March 6, 2020. The process node difference is significant: 7 nm versus 14 nm, which explains the Ryzen's higher transistor count in a similar die area.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest recorded gap appears in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where the Ryzen 9 4900HS scores 1863 against the Xeon's 835. This represents a 55.2% deficit for the Intel part, meaning the AMD chip delivers more than double the multi-threaded performance. The Ryzen's 8 cores and 16 threads directly explain this outcome; the Xeon's 4 cores and 8 threads cannot match the parallel throughput.

In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Ryzen 9 4900HS again wins, scoring 193 versus 117 for the Xeon. The delta is 39.4% in favor of AMD. This result is notable because the Xeon has a higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz compared to the Ryzen's 4.30 GHz, yet the Zen 2 architecture still delivers superior single-threaded performance in this test.

Geekbench multi-core shows the Ryzen winning with 6926 against the Xeon's 5174, a 25.3% advantage for AMD. This margin is smaller than the Cinebench R15 multi-core gap, suggesting the Geekbench workload scales less perfectly across the Ryzen's additional cores. Still, the 8-core part outpaces the 4-core part by a quarter.

The single Geekbench test the Xeon wins is Geekbench single-core, where it scores 1586 against the Ryzen's 1311. The Xeon leads by 21% here. This is the only benchmark where the Intel part's higher clock speeds translate into a victory, and it underscores the Xeon's strength in latency-sensitive, single-threaded tasks.

The Ryzen 9 4900HS also holds a higher average benchmark score of 2573 across all recorded tests, though the Xeon E-2274G averages 2643. This apparent contradiction stems from the different benchmark sets: the Xeon has Cinebench R20 and R23 scores recorded, while the Ryzen does not. The Xeon's average is pulled up by its strong R20 single-core score of 491 and R23 single-core score of 1170. The Ryzen's average reflects only the four head-to-head tests plus its own Cinebench R15 results. Both processors share the same 49th percentile ranking, indicating they sit at the midpoint of all CPUs in the database.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. Core count: 4 for the Xeon versus 8 for the Ryzen. Threads: 8 versus 16. Base clock: 4.00 GHz versus 3.00 GHz. Boost clock: 4.90 GHz versus 4.30 GHz. TDP: 83 watts versus 35 watts. Socket: Intel Socket 1151 versus AMD Socket FP6. Architecture: Coffee Lake versus Zen 2. Process node: 14 nm versus 7 nm. Foundry: Intel versus TSMC. Die size: 126 mm² versus 156 mm². Transistor count: not recorded for the Xeon, 9,800 million for the Ryzen. L2 cache per core: 256 KB versus 512 KB. L3 cache: 8 MB shared for both, but the Ryzen's L2 is double per core. Memory bandwidth: 42.7 GB/s versus 51.2 GB/s. ECC memory: supported on the Xeon, not on the Ryzen. Integrated graphics: HD Graphics P630 versus Radeon Graphics 512SP. Market segment: Server/Workstation versus Mobile. Production status: End-of-life versus Active. Release date: May 28, 2019 versus March 6, 2020. The Xeon carries a launch MSRP of $328; the Ryzen has no recorded launch MSRP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Xeon E-2274G has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Xeon E-2274G supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS does not support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2274G has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS's boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2274G has a TDP of 83 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS has a TDP of 35 watts. The Ryzen consumes less than half the power budget.

Q: Which processor wins in Cinebench R15 multi-core?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS wins with a score of 1863 against the Intel Xeon's 835, a 55.2% advantage.

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 4900HS still in production?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS is listed as active in production. The Intel Xeon E-2274G is end-of-life.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS wins in every multi-threaded workload recorded. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows a 55.2% lead, and Geekbench multi-core shows a 25.3% lead. This makes it the superior choice for video rendering, 3D modeling, software compilation, and any task that can utilize 8 cores and 16 threads. Its 35-watt TDP also makes it suitable for thin-and-light laptops where thermal headroom is limited. The Ryzen's larger L2 cache per core (512 KB versus 256 KB) likely contributes to its single-threaded Cinebench win as well, where it beats the Xeon by 39.4% despite the Xeon's higher boost clock.

The Intel Xeon E-2274G wins only in Geekbench single-core, where it leads by 21%. This indicates that its high 4.90 GHz boost clock still matters for certain latency-sensitive workloads that do not benefit from the Zen 2 architecture's wider instruction pipeline. The Xeon also wins on ECC memory support, which is a non-performance feature but critical for server environments where silent data corruption is unacceptable. Its server/workstation market segment and Intel Socket 1151 compatibility make it a drop-in replacement for existing workstation platforms. The Xeon's 83-watt TDP, while higher, allows for sustained operation in desktop chassis with adequate cooling.

The data shows a clear split: the Ryzen 9 4900HS is the performance leader in the majority of recorded benchmarks, while the Xeon E-2274G retains relevance for single-threaded Geekbench tasks and ECC-dependent workloads. Both processors sit at the 49th percentile, meaning the overall performance tier is similar, but the Ryzen achieves this with more cores and lower power consumption. The Xeon's higher average benchmark score of 2643 versus the Ryzen's 2573 reflects its additional Cinebench R20 and R23 results, which are not recorded for the AMD part. For a buyer choosing between these two, the Ryzen 9 4900HS offers better multi-threaded performance and efficiency, while the Xeon offers single-threaded Geekbench dominance and ECC memory reliability.