CPU Comparison

# AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Intel Xeon E-2244G

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS and Intel Xeon E-2244G represent two very different approaches to CPU design: one is a low-power mobile processor built for thin laptops, the other a workstation-class chip for compact servers. Benchmark data shows a clear split: the Ryzen dominates in multi-threaded workloads while the Xeon holds a narrow edge in single-threaded performance. Both chips land at the 49th percentile among all CPUs, making them statistically equivalent in overall standing, but their strengths could not be more different.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic gap appears in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where the AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS scores 1863 against the Intel Xeon E-2244G's 818. That is a 127.8% advantage for AMD, more than double the Xeon's output. This result reflects the raw core-count difference: eight Zen 2 cores with 16 threads versus four Coffee Lake cores with 8 threads. In heavily threaded rendering workloads, the Ryzen is simply in another class.

Single-core Cinebench R15 also favors AMD, though by a smaller margin. The Ryzen 9 4900HS posts 193 versus the Xeon's 115, a 67.8% lead. This is a surprising result given the Xeon's higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz, but the Zen 2 architecture's instructions-per-clock efficiency appears to compensate. The Xeon's higher clock speed does not translate into a win here.

GeekBench multi-core follows the same pattern: the Ryzen scores 6926, the Xeon 4712, giving AMD a 47% advantage. This test reinforces the multi-threaded dominance seen in Cinebench R15. However, GeekBench single-core flips the script, the Xeon wins with 1408 against the Ryzen's 1311, a 6.9% margin. This is the only benchmark where Intel comes out ahead, but it is a meaningful one for lightly threaded applications.

The Intel Xeon E-2244G also has additional benchmark data not shared by the AMD chip: Cinebench R20 multi-core at 3412, R20 single-core at 481, R23 multi-core at 8126, and R23 single-core at 1147. These scores show the Xeon holding its own in newer Cinebench versions, though without comparable AMD numbers, cross-chip comparisons are limited to the four shared tests.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS uses Zen 2 architecture built on TSMC's 7 nm process, packing 9,800 million transistors into a 156 mm² die. It is a mobile part in the 4000 series, codenamed Renoir, designed for the AMD Socket FP6 platform. The Intel Xeon E-2244G uses Coffee Lake architecture on Intel's 14 nm process, with a 126 mm² die and no transistor count listed. It belongs to the Xeon E-2200 series, codenamed Coffee Lake-S WS, and uses the Intel Socket 1151.

Core counts differ sharply: the Ryzen offers 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Xeon provides 4 cores and 8 threads. Both use a dual-channel DDR4 memory bus, but AMD's memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s versus Intel's 42.7 GB/s. Cache configurations also diverge, both share 8 MB of L3 cache, but the Ryzen has 512 KB of L2 per core versus the Xeon's 256 KB per core, and both have 64 KB of L1 per core.

Integrated graphics distinguish the two as well. The Ryzen 9 4900HS carries Radeon Graphics with 512 SPs, while the Xeon E-2244G includes HD Graphics P630. Neither is designed for serious gaming, but the AMD solution is notably more capable on paper. The Xeon supports ECC memory; the Ryzen does not. PCIe support is Gen 3 on both, though the Xeon specifies 16 lanes from the CPU only, while the AMD part lists no lane count.

Power and thermal characteristics set these chips apart dramatically. The Ryzen 9 4900HS has a 35W TDP, making it suitable for slim laptops. The Xeon E-2244G draws 71W, more than double, reflecting its workstation orientation. The Ryzen is an active mobile product released on 2020-03-06, while the Xeon is end-of-life, released on 2019-05-28. The Xeon has a launch MSRP of $272; the Ryzen has no listed MSRP.

The Verdict

Data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS for multi-threaded workloads. The 127.8% Cinebench R15 multi-core lead is decisive, and the 47% GeekBench multi-core gap confirms it. Anyone running rendering, compilation, or other parallel tasks should choose the Ryzen without hesitation. The 8-core/16-thread configuration simply overwhelms the Xeon's 4-core/8-thread layout.

The Intel Xeon E-2244G wins the single-core GeekBench test by 6.9%, which matters for older or poorly threaded software. However, the Ryzen also wins single-core Cinebench R15 by 67.8%, creating a conflicting picture. The Xeon's higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz helps in some single-threaded scenarios, but the Zen 2 architecture's efficiency wins others. For mixed workloads, the Ryzen's three wins out of four shared benchmarks make it the safer overall choice.

The Xeon's advantages are structural rather than performance-based: ECC memory support and a server/workstation market segment make it suitable for reliability-focused builds. Its end-of-life status and 71W TDP are drawbacks, while the Ryzen's 35W TDP and active production status offer longevity and efficiency. For most users, the Ryzen 9 4900HS is the stronger processor; the Xeon E-2244G makes sense only when ECC is non-negotiable.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | Intel Xeon E-2244G |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 4 |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 35W | 71W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP6 | Intel Socket 1151 |

| Architecture | Zen 2 | Coffee Lake |

| Codename | Renoir | Coffee Lake-S WS |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 9,800 million | Not listed |

| Die Size | 156 mm² | 126 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 42.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3 | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics 512SP | HD Graphics P630 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2020-03-06 | 2019-05-28 |

| Part Number | 100-000000099 | SRFAY |

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Xeon E-2244G has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon E-2244G support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Xeon E-2244G supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS does not.

Q: Which processor has a lower TDP?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS has a 35W TDP, much lower than the Intel Xeon E-2244G's 71W TDP.

Q: What is the biggest performance difference between the two?

A: In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS scores 1863 versus the Xeon's 818, a 127.8% advantage for AMD.

Q: Which CPU wins in single-core GeekBench?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2244G wins GeekBench single-core with 1408 against the Ryzen's 1311, a 6.9% margin.

Q: Are both processors still in production?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS is listed as Active, while the Intel Xeon E-2244G is End-of-life.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS wins in every multi-threaded benchmark shared between the two: Cinebench R15 multi-core by 127.8%, GeekBench multi-core by 47%, and Cinebench R15 single-core by 67.8%. Its 8 cores, 16 threads, larger L2 cache (512 KB per core), higher memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s), and superior integrated graphics (Radeon 512SP) make it the choice for rendering, video encoding, and any workload that scales across cores. The 35W TDP also makes it viable in thin-and-light laptops without active cooling concerns.

The Intel Xeon E-2244G wins only GeekBench single-core by 6.9%, leveraging its 4.80 GHz boost clock. Its real advantages are platform-level: ECC memory support, a server/workstation market segment, and 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU. These features matter for small servers, NAS builds, or workstations where data integrity and expansion are priorities over raw throughput. The 3.80 GHz base clock and 4.80 GHz boost clock give it strong single-threaded responsiveness for legacy applications.

For a laptop buyer, the Ryzen 9 4900HS is the obvious pick. For a server builder requiring ECC and a compact Socket 1151 platform, the Xeon E-2244G remains a viable, though end-of-life, option. The data shows the Ryzen as the faster processor in most scenarios, but the Xeon's institutional features serve a specific, reliability-focused niche.