AMD Ryzen 9 270 vs Intel Core 7 251TE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 9 270

CORE STATE Hawk Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 7 251TE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 24 Cores / 32 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.4 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 36 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,664
2,572
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
376
362
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
11,103
10,717
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,567
1,512
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
26,438
25,518
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,732
3,602
passmark_data_compression
351,398
334,399
passmark_data_encryption
20,852
22,176
passmark_extended_instructions
26,729
16,974
passmark_find_prime_numbers
88
140
passmark_floating_point_math
60,122
85,607
passmark_integer_math
98,266
125,739
passmark_multithread
29,089
30,022
passmark_physics
1,365
1,938
passmark_random_string_sorting
42,819
39,643
passmark_single_thread
3,784
3,568
passmark_singlethread
3,784
3,568

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 9 270 vs Intel Core 7 251TE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data splits these two processors into clearly different strength profiles. The AMD Ryzen 9 270 wins 11 of the 17 recorded comparisons, while the Intel Core 7 251TE wins 6. The overall average benchmark score favors Intel, however, at 41650 versus 40246, a margin of roughly 3.5%.

The AMD Ryzen 9 270 dominates the Cinebench suite. It leads by 3.6% in Cinebench R15 multicore (2664 versus 2572), Cinebench R20 multicore (11103 versus 10717), and Cinebench R23 multicore (26438 versus 25518). Single-core results follow the same pattern: AMD leads by 3.9% in R15 single-core (376 versus 362) and by 3.6% in both R20 single-core (1567 versus 1512) and R23 single-core (3732 versus 3602). These consistent margins across all three Cinebench versions indicate a uniform advantage in both lightly threaded and fully threaded rendering workloads.

The largest single win for AMD comes in PassMark extended instructions, where the Ryzen 9 270 scores 26729 against Intel's 16974, a 57.5% advantage. This is the most lopsided result in the entire comparison. AMD also wins PassMark data compression by 5.1% (351398 versus 334399), random string sorting by 8% (42819 versus 39643), and single-thread performance by 6.1% (3784 versus 3568).

Intel takes the lead in raw computational throughput categories. The Core 7 251TE scores 85607 in floating point math versus 60122 for AMD, a 29.8% advantage. It leads integer math by 21.8% (125739 versus 98266) and physics by 29.6% (1938 versus 1365). The Intel part also wins PassMark multithread by 3.1% (30022 versus 29089), data encryption by 6% (22176 versus 20852), and find prime numbers by 37.1% (140 versus 88).

The overall average score tells a different story than the head-to-head win count. Intel's larger wins in floating point, integer, and physics outweigh AMD's more numerous but smaller victories elsewhere. The database percentile rankings reflect this: Intel sits at the 88th percentile of all CPUs, AMD at the 87th.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 9 270 is the stronger choice for rendering and content creation workloads. Every Cinebench test, from R15 through R23, and in both single-core and multicore modes, goes to AMD. The extended instructions result, with its 57.5% lead, suggests the AMD architecture handles advanced instruction sets more efficiently. Data compression and random string sorting also favor AMD, which points toward file archiving and general data manipulation tasks.

The Intel Core 7 251TE wins where the workload scales with raw execution resources. Floating point math, integer math, and physics simulations all show Intel ahead by roughly 22% to 30%. The prime number finding test, which Intel wins by 37.1%, is a classic measure of pure integer throughput. Data encryption also favors Intel, which matters for security-related tasks. The multithread PassMark result puts Intel ahead by 3.1%, suggesting that heavily threaded general workloads may favor the Intel part even though Cinebench multicore does not.

Neither processor wins every category. The split is functional: AMD for rendering and instruction-heavy workloads, Intel for math and encryption.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 270. It wins Cinebench R15 single-core by 3.9% (376 versus 362) and PassMark single-thread by 6.1% (3784 versus 3568).

Q: Which processor wins in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 270, scoring 26438 versus 25518 for the Intel Core 7 251TE, a 3.6% margin.

Q: Where does the Intel Core 7 251TE show its biggest advantage?

A: In floating point math, where it scores 85607 versus 60122, a 29.8% lead. It also leads integer math by 21.8% and physics by 29.6%.

Q: How do the two processors compare in overall average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE averages 41650 across all recorded benchmarks, while the AMD Ryzen 9 270 averages 40246.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking in the database?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE ranks at the 88th percentile of all CPUs, slightly above the AMD Ryzen 9 270 at the 87th percentile.

Q: Does either processor win in data compression?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 270 wins PassMark data compression with 351398 versus 334399, a 5.1% advantage.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ substantially in core configuration. The AMD Ryzen 9 270 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads. Base clocks differ sharply: AMD runs at 4.00 GHz, Intel at 1.40 GHz. Boost clocks are closer, with AMD at 5.20 GHz and Intel at 5.40 GHz.

The socket and platform targets are different. AMD uses Socket FP8, a mobile platform, while Intel uses Socket 1700, a desktop platform. The market segments reflect this: AMD is listed as Mobile, Intel as Desktop.

Memory support diverges. AMD supports DDR5 only, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses with identical 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported by Intel but not by AMD.

PCIe capabilities differ. AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses Radeon 780M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 770.

Both processors have a 45 W TDP, are actively in production, and have locked multipliers. The AMD release date is 2025-01-05, the Intel release date is 2025-01-12. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $384; AMD has no recorded launch MSRP. Part numbers are 100-000001836 for AMD and SRQAXQ5ZG for Intel.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 9 270 uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, built on a 4 nm TSMC process. It contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. Cache is organized as 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3.

The Intel Core 7 251TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm Intel process. The die size is 215 mm², and no transistor count is recorded. Cache is organized as 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3.

The architecture divide is clear: AMD uses a smaller process node with fewer but faster cores, while Intel uses a larger node with more cores and more total cache. Intel's 36 MB shared L3 is more than double AMD's 16 MB. Intel also supports ECC memory, which AMD does not. The AMD part is fabricated by TSMC, the Intel part by Intel's own foundry. No 3D V-Cache is present on either processor.

The generation labels in the database are Ryzen 9 (Zen 4, Hawk Point) for AMD and Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) for Intel.

The Verdict

The recorded data gives a split decision. The AMD Ryzen 9 270 delivers higher single-core performance and wins every Cinebench test, making it the stronger option for rendering and applications that favor clock speed per thread. Its 57.5% lead in extended instructions and 6.1% lead in single-thread PassMark reinforce this profile.

The Intel Core 7 251TE wins the overall average score, the multithread PassMark test, and all math-heavy categories. Its 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with 36 MB of L3 cache, produce large margins in floating point math (29.8%), integer math (21.8%), and physics (29.6%). The 88th percentile ranking versus AMD's 87th reflects this broader advantage.

The choice depends on workload type. The AMD Ryzen 9 270 suits rendering and single-thread-sensitive tasks. The Intel Core 7 251TE suits math, encryption, and general parallel throughput. The data does not crown a single winner; it defines two distinct domains of superiority.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
9 270
7 251TE
Core Specs
Cores
8
24 +200.0%
Threads
16
32 +100.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
4
1.4 -65.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
5.4 +3.8%
Frequency (GHz)
4
1.4 -65.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
5.4 +3.8%
Multiplier
40
14 -65.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
36 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
45
45 0.0%
PL1
—
45 W
PL2
—
135 W
Configurable TDP
35-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
—
Codename
Hawk Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 9 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))
Core 7 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
25,000 million
—
Die Size
178 mm²
215 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 16
E-Core Frequency
—
1000 MHz up to 3.9 GHz
AI/NPU
XDNA NPU
16 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 780M
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$384
Part Number
100-000001836
SRQAXQ5ZG
Package
FP8, FP7, FP7r2
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen 9 270 Details View Core 7 251TE Details