AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Intel Arc G3 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark measurements for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U versus the Intel Arc G3. The recorded data shows zero wins for either processor in direct comparison tests, and no individual benchmark scores are available for the Intel Arc G3. This absence of comparative data means the analysis must rely on the AMD processor's established benchmark results and the architectural specifications recorded for both parts.

What the database does contain is a full benchmark profile for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. In Cinebench R23, the processor records a multicore score of 20,254 and a single-core score of 2,859. The Cinebench R20 results show 8,506 for multicore and 1,200 for single-core, while Cinebench R15 lists 2,041 and 288 respectively. These scores place the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 32,233.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the AMD processor's performance tier. The Intel Core i9-11900 posts an average score of 32,226, a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core i5-14400F scores 32,279, which is 0.1 percent higher. The Intel Core i7-12800H records 32,121, a delta of 0.3 percent in favor of the Ryzen part. The Intel Core i5-14400 scores 32,115, also 0.4 percent behind. These near-identical averages indicate the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U sits in a tightly contested performance band among mainstream desktop and mobile processors.

PassMark results for the AMD processor show strong integer math performance at 88,339, floating point math at 50,746, and extended instructions at 19,132. Data compression scores 272,664, while data encryption records 16,441. Multithread performance is 23,850, and single-thread performance is 3,641. Physics tests score 1,174, and random string sorting produces 33,109. Prime number finding scores just 76, which is the weakest result in the suite.

Since the Intel Arc G3 has no recorded benchmark scores, the head-to-head section cannot provide direct numerical comparisons. The database lists the Arc G3 with an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50, which reflects missing data rather than measured performance. The wins columns show 0 for both processors, confirming the absence of any comparative test results.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel Arc G3 has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U has 17 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark tests.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U averages 32,233 across its benchmark suite. The Intel Core i9-11900 averages 32,226 (0 percent delta), the Intel Core i5-14400F averages 32,279 (0.1 percent higher), the Intel Core i7-12800H averages 32,121 (0.3 percent lower), and the Intel Core i5-14400 averages 32,115 (0.4 percent lower). The differences are minimal, all within 0.4 percent.

Q: What is the performance percentile of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U sits at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Arc G3 sits at the 50th percentile, though this figure is based on no recorded benchmarks and should be interpreted as a placeholder rather than a measured result.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel part has more physical cores, but the AMD part has more threads due to simultaneous multithreading.

Q: What memory types do the two processors support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel operation and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Arc G3 supports LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel operation and a recorded bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s.

Q: Are the processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U lists multiplierUnlocked as false, and the Intel Arc G3 also lists multiplierUnlocked as false.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is the only processor in this comparison with measured performance. Its 83rd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 32,233 place it among mainstream high-performance mobile processors. The nearest rivals, all within 0.4 percent of its average score, confirm that this processor delivers competitive multi-threaded and single-threaded performance for its class.

The Intel Arc G3 cannot be evaluated on performance grounds because the database contains no benchmark results for it. Its 14 cores and 14 threads, higher memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s, and PCIe Gen 5 interface suggest a different design approach, but without recorded scores, no performance verdict is possible. The 50th percentile ranking is a data artifact, not a measured outcome.

For users selecting a processor based on available evidence, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is the only part with proven benchmark results. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20,254 and single-core score of 2,859 indicate balanced performance across both workload types. The PassMark results reinforce this, with strong integer math, floating point math, and data compression scores.

The Intel Arc G3 remains an unmeasured quantity in the database. Its specifications show a newer process node at 3 nm versus 4 nm, more cores, and higher memory bandwidth, but these specifications alone do not translate into benchmark scores. Users requiring verified performance data should consider the AMD processor, which has a full suite of recorded results.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Arc G3 uses 14 cores and 14 threads. Base clocks differ substantially: the AMD part runs at 3.30 GHz, the Intel part at 1.90 GHz. Boost clocks are closer, with the AMD part reaching 5.10 GHz and the Intel part reaching 4.60 GHz.

Thermal design power differs by 3 watts, with the AMD processor rated at 28 W and the Intel processor at 25 W. Socket compatibility is entirely different: the AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 2540. The process node also differs, with the AMD part built on 4 nm by TSMC and the Intel part built on 3 nm by Intel's own foundry.

Memory support separates the two clearly. The AMD processor uses DDR5 with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor uses LPDDR5X with a bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. Both are dual-channel. ECC memory support is present on the AMD part but absent on the Intel part.

PCIe connectivity shows a notable divergence. The AMD processor offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The Intel processor offers Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD part includes Radeon 780M, while the Intel part includes Arc B370.

Release dates place the AMD part in April 2024 and the Intel part in May 2026. Neither part has a recorded launch MSRP. Both are classified as mobile market segments and both are currently active in production.

Architecture Differences

The architectural records show two distinct designs. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U belongs to the 8000 series, uses Zen 4 architecture under the codename Hawk Point, and is identified as Ryzen 7 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point)). The Intel Arc G3 uses the codename Panther Lake and is identified as Arc G3 (Panther Lake), but the database lists no architecture name for the Intel part.

Cache structures differ in capacity and allocation. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor provides 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has larger per-core caches and a larger L3 pool overall.

Transistor count and die size are recorded only for the AMD processor, at 25,000 million transistors and a die size of 178 mm². No transistor count or die size is listed for the Intel Arc G3. The process node difference is significant: 4 nm for the AMD part versus 3 nm for the Intel part, with different foundries (TSMC versus Intel).

Neither processor supports 3D V-Cache, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The part numbers differ, with the AMD processor listed as 100-000001317 (FP7r2) and 100-000001377 (FP7), while the Intel processor is listed under part number SA4QZ.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U wins in every category where measurement exists. Its benchmark suite covers Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 across both multicore and single-core tests, plus a broad PassMark workload set. The recorded scores demonstrate balanced performance across integer math, floating point math, encryption, compression, and physics workloads. The 83rd percentile ranking and average score of 32,233 provide concrete evidence of its performance position.

The Intel Arc G3 wins in specifications that suggest future capability but lack measured confirmation. Its 14 cores exceed the AMD part's 8 cores, though its 14 threads fall short of the AMD part's 16 threads. Memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s is 52 percent higher than the AMD part's 89.6 GB/s, based on the recorded figures. PCIe Gen 5 support is a generation ahead of the AMD part's Gen 4. The 3 nm process node is smaller than the 4 nm node of the AMD part.

For users prioritizing verified performance, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is the only choice supported by benchmark data. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20,254 and single-core score of 2,859 indicate strong performance in both threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 23,850 and single-thread score of 3,641 reinforce this pattern.

For users prioritizing architectural specifications, the Intel Arc G3 offers a newer process node, higher memory bandwidth, more physical cores, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity. These are meaningful specification advantages, but they remain unvalidated by benchmark scores in the database. The Intel part's LPDDR5X memory support and larger cache allocations provide a specification profile that could translate into performance advantages, but no recorded data confirms this.

The database presents a one-sided comparison. The AMD processor has a complete performance record, while the Intel processor has none. Any decision between the two must account for this asymmetry: the AMD part delivers measurable performance at the 83rd percentile, while the Intel part offers specifications that are promising but unproven in the recorded data.