AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 vs Intel Core i7-14650HX Comparison

The Intel Core i7-14650HX and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 are two very different approaches to high-end computing, separated by platform, architecture, and intended use case. The benchmark data shows a near-total dead heat in average score—the Intel part averages 43,770 versus AMD’s 43,704, a difference of just 0.2%—yet the pattern of wins is far from balanced. The Intel chip takes 14 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons, while AMD wins 3. However, average scores can obscure the fact that these two processors excel in completely different workloads, and the choice between them depends heavily on whether a buyer prioritizes raw multithreaded throughput or specialized instruction-set performance.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result is in PassMark floating-point math, where the Intel Core i7-14650HX scores 88,746 against AMD’s 63,332—a 40.1% advantage. This is the largest delta in any test and points to Intel’s hybrid core arrangement being exceptionally strong at sustained floating-point throughput. Similarly, in PassMark physics, Intel posts 2,339 versus AMD’s 1,699, a 37.7% lead. These two results alone suggest that any workload relying on dense mathematical computation or physics simulation will heavily favor the Intel part. Integer math also swings Intel’s way, 122,004 to 103,330, an 18.1% margin.

Across the Cinebench suite, Intel maintains a consistent edge. In R23 multi-core, Intel scores 29,669 against AMD’s 27,877, a 6.4% lead. The same 6.4% delta appears in R23 single-core (4,188 vs 3,935), R20 multi-core (12,460 vs 11,708), R20 single-core (1,758 vs 1,652), and R15 tests (2,990 vs 2,809 multi, 421 vs 396 single). This consistency suggests the Intel chip’s advantage in Cinebench comes from a combination of higher boost clocks and more cores, rather than any single architectural quirk.

In PassMark multithread, Intel wins 34,927 to 32,733 (6.7%), and in data compression, Intel leads 414,971 to 386,829 (7.3%). Data encryption also favors Intel, 23,949 to 22,821 (4.9%). The single-thread PassMark results are nearly identical: Intel 3,862, AMD 3,849, a mere 0.3% difference. This is the closest margin in the entire dataset, showing that for basic single-core tasks, the two are effectively interchangeable.

AMD’s three wins are concentrated in specific instruction-heavy workloads. The largest is PassMark extended instructions, where AMD scores 29,216 against Intel’s 25,139—a 14% advantage. This is a significant reversal, indicating AMD’s Zen 4 architecture handles AVX-512 or similar extended instruction sets far more efficiently. AMD also wins random string sorting, 46,759 to 44,413 (5% lead), and find prime numbers, 166 to 161 (3% lead). These wins are narrow compared to Intel’s blowout in floating-point math, but they show AMD is not without counter-punches in the right scenarios.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX averages 43,770 across all benchmarks, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 averages 43,704. Intel is ahead by 0.2%, which is statistically negligible.

Q: How big is Intel’s lead in multi-core rendering?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 29,669 versus AMD’s 27,877, a 6.4% advantage. The same 6.4% delta appears in R20 multi-core (12,460 vs 11,708) and R15 multi-core (2,990 vs 2,809).

Q: Where does AMD outperform Intel by the largest margin?

A: AMD’s biggest win is in PassMark extended instructions, scoring 29,216 against Intel’s 25,139, a 14% lead. This is the only test where AMD’s margin exceeds 5%.

Q: Do the two CPUs differ in single-thread performance?

A: Barely. In PassMark single-thread, Intel scores 3,862 and AMD scores 3,849, a 0.3% difference. Cinebench R23 single-core shows a slightly larger gap: Intel 4,188, AMD 3,935, a 6.4% Intel lead.

Q: How many benchmark wins does each CPU have?

A: Intel wins 14 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons. AMD wins 3: extended instructions, random string sorting, and find prime numbers.

Q: Which CPU has a higher transistor count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 has 6,570 million transistors. The Intel chip’s transistor count is not listed in the data.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two parts is fundamental. Intel’s Core i7-14650HX is built on Raptor Lake, a 10 nm process from Intel’s own foundry, with a die size of 257 mm². It uses a hybrid design with 16 cores and 24 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores to balance power and throughput. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core, L2 is 2 MB per core, and L3 is 30 MB shared. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, running on a dual-channel bus. The integrated GPU is UHD Graphics 710.

AMD’s Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is a very different beast. It uses Zen 4 architecture (codename Raphael) on a 5 nm TSMC process, with a much smaller die of 71 mm² and 6,570 million transistors. It is a monolithic 8-core, 16-thread design, with L1 cache at 64 KB per core, L2 at 1 MB per core, and a larger 32 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 only, on a dual-channel bus, with a listed memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The integrated graphics are Radeon Graphics. Both chips support ECC memory, but their sockets differ entirely: Intel uses BGA 1964 (mobile), while AMD uses AM5 (desktop/server). Intel’s PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while AMD offers Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only).

The process node difference is significant—10 nm versus 5 nm—but the Intel chip compensates with more cores and a higher boost clock. AMD’s smaller die and higher transistor density suggest a more efficient design per watt, though the benchmark data shows Intel winning most compute-heavy tests anyway.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ in nearly every headline specification. Intel has 16 cores and 24 threads, while AMD has 8 cores and 16 threads—a 2x core advantage for Intel. Base clocks are 2.20 GHz for Intel versus 3.80 GHz for AMD, but Intel’s boost clock is 5.20 GHz, slightly below AMD’s 5.30 GHz. TDP is 55 W for Intel and 65 W for AMD. Intel’s socket is BGA 1964 (mobile-focused), while AMD uses AM5. Process node is 10 nm (Intel) versus 5 nm (TSMC). Die size is 257 mm² for Intel, 71 mm² for AMD. Cache configurations differ: Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, 30 MB L3 shared; AMD has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, 32 MB L3 shared. Memory support: Intel takes DDR4 and DDR5, AMD only DDR5. Memory bandwidth is listed only for AMD at 83.2 GB/s. PCIe lanes are 16 (Intel) versus 24 (AMD), both Gen 5. Integrated graphics: Intel UHD Graphics 710 versus AMD Radeon Graphics. Intel’s multiplier is unlocked, AMD’s is not. Release dates differ: Intel launched on 2024-01-07, AMD on 2023-06-12. Market segments also differ: Intel is labeled Mobile, AMD is Server/Workstation. Intel’s part number is SRMXH, AMD’s is 100-000000599.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14650HX is the clear choice for multithreaded compute-heavy workloads. Its wins in floating-point math (40.1% ahead), physics (37.7% ahead), and integer math (18.1% ahead) make it superior for scientific computing, 3D rendering, and any simulation that relies on heavy arithmetic. The consistent 6.4% lead across all Cinebench versions—r15, r20, and r23—in both single and multi-core tests confirms it is also better for content creation tasks like video editing and 3D modeling. Data compression (7.3% ahead) and encryption (4.9% ahead) add to the list, making it the stronger all-rounder for productivity suites that involve file handling and security. With 14 wins out of 17, the Intel part is the default recommendation for anyone who needs maximum compute throughput across a wide variety of tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 wins in three specific niches. The 14% lead in extended instructions is the most important—this targets AVX-512 and similar vectorized workloads, which are common in certain scientific and AI applications. If a user’s software explicitly leverages these instructions, AMD’s advantage could outweigh Intel’s other wins. Random string sorting (5% ahead) points to a slight edge in text processing or database operations involving unsorted data. The 3% lead in find prime numbers is minor, but it indicates AMD’s integer path is not wholly inferior. For a workstation or server environment where extended instructions are the primary load, AMD is the better fit. Its 24 PCIe lanes also give it more room for expansion, despite the lower core count.

The Verdict

The data supports a straightforward split. For most users, the Intel Core i7-14650HX is the better buy. It wins 14 of 17 benchmarks, including every Cinebench test and the most math-intensive PassMark workloads. The 40.1% lead in floating-point math and 37.7% lead in physics are not minor margins; they translate into visible performance gains in rendering, simulation, and number-crunching. Its 16 cores and 24 threads provide a 2x core advantage over AMD’s 8 cores, and the 0.2% average score difference is effectively a tie, but Intel’s wins are in more mainstream workloads. The unlocked multiplier also appeals to enthusiasts who want to push beyond stock settings.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the specialist’s pick. Its 14% lead in extended instructions is the single largest AMD advantage in the entire dataset, and that matters for users running AVX-512-heavy code. The 24 PCIe lanes and larger 32 MB L3 cache make it more suitable for server/workstation environments where I/O expansion and cache-sensitive workloads are priorities. The smaller 5 nm die and lower core count suggest better power efficiency per core, though the TDP is higher at 65 W versus 55 W. Its wins in random string sorting and find prime numbers are narrow, but they confirm AMD is not without merit in specific algorithmic tasks.

Choose the Intel Core i7-14650HX if you need a jack-of-all-trades that dominates general compute, rendering, and data compression. Choose the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 if your software specifically exploits extended instructions or if you need the extra PCIe lanes for a workstation build. The average scores are nearly identical, but the workload profiles are not.