AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 vs Intel Core i5-14600 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear pattern: the Intel Core i5-14600 dominates the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 across the vast majority of recorded tests, winning 15 of 17 head-to-head comparisons. The most striking victories come in the PassMark physics and floating point math workloads, where Intel leads by 37.1% and 35.4% respectively. These are not marginal differences; they represent substantial performance gaps that suggest fundamentally different strengths in compute-heavy scenarios.

The Cinebench suite shows a remarkably consistent story. Across all six Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 tests, both single-core and multi-core, the Intel Core i5-14600 wins by exactly 9.3%. The multi-core scores tell the tale: 3070 versus 2809 in R15, 12794 versus 11708 in R20, and 30464 versus 27877 in R23. The single-core results follow the same pattern, with the Intel part scoring 433, 1806, and 4300 across the three versions, while AMD trails at 396, 1652, and 3935. The consistency of this 9.3% margin across every Cinebench test indicates a stable architectural advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk.

PassMark integer math also favors Intel significantly, with a 13.3% lead (117078 versus 103330). Data compression shows a 12.4% advantage for Intel (434620 versus 386829), and data encryption comes in at 9.9% (25082 versus 22821). The multithread score reflects the broader trend with a 9.5% edge (35848 versus 32733). Even random string sorting, the closest Intel win, shows a 2.7% advantage (48043 versus 46759).

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 does claim two victories, and they are worth examining closely. The extended instructions test shows AMD ahead by 12.1% (29216 versus 25674), and the find prime numbers test gives AMD a 6.6% lead (166 versus 155). These wins suggest that in specific instruction-heavy or integer-iteration workloads, the Zen 4 architecture can outperform Raptor Lake despite losing elsewhere. The single-thread PassMark score also confirms the overall trend: Intel leads 4167 to 3849, an 8.3% margin.

Where Each One Wins

The use-case split follows directly from the benchmark distribution. The Intel Core i5-14600 is the clear choice for general productivity, content creation, and any workload that relies on floating point math or physics calculations. The 35.4% lead in floating point math and 37.1% lead in physics are the largest margins in the entire comparison, making Intel the obvious pick for scientific computing, 3D rendering, or simulation tasks. The 13.3% integer math advantage reinforces this for general computational work.

Multithreaded workloads broadly favor Intel, as shown by the 9.5% multithread score lead and the uniform 9.3% Cinebench margins. Data compression and encryption, common in file archiving and security applications, also sit firmly in Intel's camp with 12.4% and 9.9% advantages respectively. For users running heavy parallel workloads, the data consistently points to the Intel part.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 finds its niche in extended instruction sets and prime number calculations. The 12.1% extended instructions win suggests AMD handles SIMD-style or specialized instruction workloads more efficiently. The 6.6% prime number victory indicates strength in iteration-heavy integer loops. These are narrower use cases, but for developers working with specialized instruction sets or cryptographic applications that rely on prime generation, the AMD part holds a measurable edge.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core i5-14600 uses a hybrid architecture with 14 cores and 20 threads, built on Raptor Lake and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses a traditional homogeneous design with 8 cores and 16 threads, based on Zen 4 and manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm node. The core count difference explains much of Intel's multi-threaded advantage: 14 cores versus 8 cores provides more parallel execution resources.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. AMD uses 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and a larger 32 MB shared L3. The larger L3 on AMD could benefit certain cache-sensitive workloads, but the benchmark data shows Intel winning most tests despite the smaller shared cache.

Memory support creates a practical distinction. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility for system builders. The AMD part supports DDR5 only, with a rated memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory buses and both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity also differs: Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while AMD provides Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes. The extra PCIe lanes on AMD could matter for workstation configurations with multiple expansion cards.

The physical characteristics differ substantially. Intel's die measures 257 mm², while AMD's compute die is just 71 mm², with AMD listing 6,570 million transistors. Both run at a 65 W TDP. The AMD part has a higher base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz compared to Intel's 2.70 GHz base and 5.20 GHz boost, yet AMD still loses most performance comparisons, underscoring that core count and architecture efficiency matter more than raw clock rates in these tests.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How large is the performance gap in multi-core workloads?

A: Across all three Cinebench multi-core tests, the Intel Core i5-14600 leads by exactly 9.3%. In PassMark multithread, the lead is 9.5%.

Q: Is there any workload where the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 wins?

A: Yes, the AMD part wins in extended instructions by 12.1% (29216 versus 25674) and in find prime numbers by 6.6% (166 versus 155).

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 supports DDR5 only.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i5-14600 and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 support ECC memory.

Q: What is the largest single performance margin in the comparison?

A: The largest margin is in PassMark physics, where the Intel Core i5-14600 leads by 37.1% (2330 versus 1699). The floating point math test is close behind at 35.4%.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14600 | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 14 | 8 |

| Threads | 20 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.70 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.30 GHz |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 257 mm² | 71 mm² |

| Transistors | Not listed | 6,570 million |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 83.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 24 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Graphics |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | AMD Socket AM5 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Server/Workstation |

| Release Date | 2024-01-07 | 2023-06-12 |

| Launch MSRP | $255 | Not listed |

The Verdict

The data makes a decisive case for the Intel Core i5-14600 as the stronger performer in almost every measured category. The 15 wins out of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, including every Cinebench test and the dominant physics and floating point margins, position it as the superior choice for users who prioritize raw compute performance. The 37.1% physics lead and 35.4% floating point lead are not subtle differences; they represent categories where Intel is dramatically faster.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 retains relevance for specific niches. Its 12.1% extended instructions win and 6.6% prime number advantage point to workloads that leverage specialized instruction sets or heavy integer iteration. Its 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and larger 32 MB L3 cache also offer architectural benefits for workstation builds, and its server/workstation market segment suggests it was designed with different priorities in mind. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is a listed advantage that may benefit memory-intensive applications.

For general-purpose computing, content creation, physics simulations, or any task that scales with core count, the Intel Core i5-14600 is the clear recommendation based on benchmark results. For developers targeting extended instruction workloads or users building around AMD's larger PCIe lane count and workstation-oriented platform, the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 offers a defensible alternative despite losing most performance comparisons. The average benchmark scores reinforce this: Intel sits at 44889 with a 89th percentile ranking, while AMD sits at 43704 with an 88th percentile ranking, placing both in the upper tier of all CPUs but with Intel holding a measurable edge.