AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 vs Intel Core i5-14500 Comparison

The Intel Core i5-14500 and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 are exceptionally close competitors, separated by a mere 0.4% in average benchmark score. The data shows a clear split: AMD’s Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 dominates most multi-threaded and productivity workloads, while Intel’s Core i5-14500 takes decisive victories in floating-point math and single-threaded PassMark tests. The AMD part wins 12 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, but the Intel chip’s wins are often by larger margins, making the choice heavily dependent on workload type.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the clear winner for multi-core rendering and general productivity. It leads in every Cinebench test—R15, R20, and R23—by a consistent 4.1% margin, both in single-core and multi-core variants. This suggests a uniform architectural advantage in rendering workloads that scales across all thread counts. The Ryzen also wins in data compression, encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, multithreaded PassMark, and random string sorting. Its 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 5.30 GHz boost clock likely contribute to these wins, though the data does not specify causality.

The Intel Core i5-14500 wins in floating-point math by a massive 26.9%, and in integer math by 5.5%. It also takes PassMark physics by 7.8% and PassMark single-thread by 2.7%. This makes Intel the better choice for scientific computing, physics simulations, and any workload that relies heavily on floating-point operations. The physics win is particularly notable because it suggests Intel’s hybrid core design excels in gaming-adjacent workloads that stress physical simulations.

For content creators, the split is stark: AMD for video rendering and compression, Intel for math-heavy tasks. For general office use and single-threaded applications, the results are mixed—AMD wins Cinebench single-core, but Intel wins PassMark single-thread. The tie-breaker goes to the specific application being used.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 scores 27877 versus Intel’s 26741, a 4.1% advantage. This pattern holds across all Cinebench versions, indicating a consistent rendering advantage for AMD.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-14500 better at anything?

A: Yes, it wins floating-point math by 26.9% (80387 vs 63332), integer math by 5.5%, physics by 7.8%, and PassMark single-thread by 2.7%. These are substantial wins in math-heavy workloads.

Q: How close are these CPUs overall?

A: The average benchmark scores are 43861 for Intel and 43704 for AMD, a delta of just 0.4%. Both sit at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, making them effectively tied in overall performance.

Q: Which CPU has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500 has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 has 8 cores and 16 threads. Despite fewer cores, AMD wins most multi-threaded tests.

Q: What about memory support?

A: Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD supports only DDR5. AMD has a specified memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while Intel’s bandwidth is not listed in the data.

Q: Which CPU is better for encryption tasks?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 wins data encryption by 3.9% (22821 vs 21924) and extended instructions by 20.6% (29216 vs 23184), making it the clear choice for security and instruction-heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The biggest win for AMD is in PassMark extended instructions, where it scores 29216 versus Intel’s 23184—a 20.6% advantage. This is followed by a 33.7% lead in find prime numbers (166 vs 110), and a 10.1% lead in random string sorting (46759 vs 42052). These are not marginal differences; they represent fundamental architectural strengths in specific instruction types and algorithmic workloads.

AMD’s Cinebench wins are remarkably consistent: every single test shows a 4.0% to 4.1% delta. This uniformity suggests a stable performance-per-clock advantage in rendering workloads, regardless of thread count. The R15, R20, and R23 multi-core scores all follow this pattern, as do the single-core variants.

Intel’s counterattack is led by a 26.9% win in floating-point math (80387 vs 63332). This is the largest margin in the entire head-to-head set and indicates a decisive advantage in scientific and engineering calculations. Intel also wins integer math by 5.5% (108988 vs 103330) and physics by 7.8% (1832 vs 1699). The PassMark single-thread win is smaller at 2.7% (3953 vs 3849), but it is notable because AMD wins Cinebench single-core.

The multithreaded PassMark score goes to AMD at 32733 versus 31463, a 3.9% lead. Data compression also goes to AMD at 386829 versus 381384, a 1.4% margin. These are closer calls but still favor AMD. Overall, AMD wins 12 benchmarks to Intel’s 5, but Intel’s wins include the two largest margins in the set.

Specification Differences

The Intel Core i5-14500 features 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 offers 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks differ significantly: Intel runs at 2.60 GHz, while AMD runs at 3.80 GHz. Boost clocks are closer, with Intel at 5.00 GHz and AMD at 5.30 GHz. Both have a TDP of 65 watts.

Memory support diverges: Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD supports only DDR5. AMD lists a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while Intel’s is not specified. PCIe lanes differ as well, with Intel offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) and AMD offering Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ: Intel uses UHD Graphics 770, while AMD uses Radeon Graphics. The sockets are incompatible: Intel uses Socket 1700, while AMD uses Socket AM5. The launch MSRP for Intel is $232; no launch MSRP is listed for AMD. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i5-14500 is built on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. It uses a hybrid core design, though the data does not specify core type ratios. The die size is 215 mm². Cache configuration is 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses Zen 4 architecture on a 5 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. It has 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. Cache is 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. AMD’s smaller process node and larger L3 cache are notable differences.

The foundry difference is significant: Intel uses its own fabrication, while AMD relies on TSMC. The process node difference (10 nm vs 5 nm) likely explains AMD’s higher base and boost clocks despite a lower core count. The market segments also differ: Intel targets Desktop, while AMD is classified for Server/Workstation use.

Release dates differ by roughly seven months: Intel launched on 2024-01-07, while AMD launched on 2023-06-12. Both are marked as Active in production status. The part numbers are SRN3T for Intel and 100-000000599 for AMD.

The Verdict

Pick the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 if your workload centers on rendering, compression, encryption, or extended instruction sets. The data shows it wins every Cinebench test by 4.1% and takes data compression, encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, multithreaded performance, and random string sorting. It achieves these wins with fewer cores (8 vs 14) and threads (16 vs 20), demonstrating superior per-core efficiency. For video editors, data analysts, and security professionals, AMD is the data-backed choice.

Pick the Intel Core i5-14500 if your work involves floating-point math, physics calculations, or integer-heavy tasks. The 26.9% win in floating-point math is the largest margin in the entire comparison, and the 7.8% physics win suggests an edge in simulation workloads. Intel also wins PassMark single-thread, which may benefit certain legacy or single-threaded applications. For scientists, engineers, and gamers running physics-heavy titles, Intel’s wins are more relevant despite being fewer in number.

The overall average scores are nearly identical—43861 for Intel vs 43704 for AMD—so neither chip is a universal recommendation. The 92nd percentile placement for both reinforces that these are top-tier processors. The AMD part’s higher boost clock (5.30 vs 5.00 GHz) and larger L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB) align with its multi-threaded wins, while Intel’s higher core count and larger L1 cache (80 KB vs 64 KB per core) align with its math wins. Choose based on your specific application mix, not on overall scores.