AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U vs Intel Xeon E-2186G Comparison

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a fascinating split decision between these two processors. The Intel Xeon E-2186G and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U each claim three wins across the six head-to-head tests, yet the margin of victory tells a more nuanced story than the win count alone.

Starting with Cinebench R15, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U delivers a decisive blow in multi-core performance, scoring 1756 against Intel's 1158 — a 34.1% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison, and it reflects the AMD chip's additional two cores and four threads. The single-core R15 test shows a similar pattern, with AMD winning 229 to 163, a 28.8% gap that is surprisingly wide for a single-threaded workload.

However, the narrative flips dramatically when moving to newer Cinebench versions. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Xeon E-2186G surges ahead with 11492 points versus AMD's 10095, a 13.8% victory. The single-core R23 test also favors Intel, 1622 to 1441, a 12.6% margin. This reversal between R15 and R23 is curious — it suggests the two architectures respond very differently to the workload evolution between benchmark versions, with Intel's higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz potentially playing a role in the newer tests.

Geekbench results add another layer of complexity. The Intel Xeon E-2186G wins the multi-core test with 6204 points against AMD's 5661, a 9.6% lead. Yet the single-core Geekbench result is essentially a dead heat: AMD edges out Intel by a single point, 1551 to 1550, a negligible 0.1% difference. This near-perfect tie in single-core Geekbench performance, despite the substantial gap in the R23 single-core test, highlights how benchmark methodology can produce divergent conclusions.

The overall average benchmark scores reflect this parity. The Intel Xeon E-2186G averages 3462 across all tests, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U averages 3456 — a difference of just 0.2%. Both processors sit at the 54th percentile among all CPUs, placing them in the same performance tier despite their wildly different architectures and target markets.

Looking at the nearest rivals confirms that both chips occupy a similar competitive space. The Intel Xeon E-2186G sits within 0.5% of the Intel Core i7-9700F, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U, AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS, and Intel Core i7-10870H. The AMD chip shows the same clustering, within 0.3% of the Ryzen 5 5600HS and Core i7-10870H. This is a remarkably tight pack of processors with vastly different core counts, clock speeds, and power envelopes.

# Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is substantial, beginning with their fundamental design philosophies. The Intel Xeon E-2186G belongs to the Xeon E-2100 series, built on the Coffee Lake architecture with a 14 nm process node manufactured by Intel. Its die size measures 154 mm². In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U uses the Zen 3 architecture on a 7 nm process node from TSMC, with a larger 180 mm² die that packs 10,700 million transistors.

Core configuration differs significantly. The Intel chip provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD chip offers 8 cores and 16 threads. This 33% core advantage for AMD explains its dominance in the Cinebench R15 multi-core test. However, the Intel chip compensates with higher clock speeds: a 3.80 GHz base clock and 4.70 GHz boost, compared to AMD's 2.00 GHz base and 4.50 GHz boost. The massive base clock difference (3.80 GHz versus 2.00 GHz) reflects their vastly different power targets — Intel runs at 95 W TDP, while AMD sips just 15 W.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. Both share 64 KB of L1 cache per core, but AMD doubles the L2 cache to 512 KB per core versus Intel's 256 KB. For L3, AMD provides 16 MB shared cache, while Intel offers 12 MB. These cache advantages help AMD compensate for its lower clock speeds in certain workloads.

Memory support shows both chips supporting DDR4 with dual-channel buses, but AMD achieves higher memory bandwidth at 51.2 GB/s versus Intel's 42.7 GB/s. Both support ECC memory, which is notable for a mobile chip like the Ryzen 7 PRO. PCIe connectivity is identical: Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics differ: Intel uses HD Graphics P630, while AMD employs Radeon Graphics (Vega 8). The AMD solution is generally more capable, though the data doesn't provide specific graphics benchmarks. Socket compatibility separates them completely — Intel uses Socket 1151, AMD uses Socket FP6, meaning no platform interchangeability.

Production status and release timing also differ. The Intel Xeon E-2186G is end-of-life, released on 2018-05-30 with a launch MSRP of $506. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U remains active, released on 2023-01-03. This five-year gap explains the process node advantage and efficiency gains in the AMD part.

# FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmarks overall?

A: The head-to-head results show a perfect tie: each processor wins exactly 3 tests. Intel wins Cinebench R23 multi-core, Cinebench R23 single-core, and Geekbench multi-core. AMD wins Cinebench R15 multi-core, Cinebench R15 single-core, and Geekbench single-core (by a single point).

Q: Why does AMD win Cinebench R15 but lose Cinebench R23 by a large margin?

A: The data shows AMD wins R15 multi-core by 34.1% and R15 single-core by 28.8%, yet Intel wins R23 multi-core by 13.8% and single-core by 12.6%. This reversal suggests the newer R23 workload favors Intel's higher 4.70 GHz boost clock, while R15 benefits from AMD's 8-core/16-thread configuration and larger 16 MB L3 cache.

Q: How close are these two processors in overall performance?

A: Extremely close. The average benchmark scores differ by only 6 points: Intel at 3462 versus AMD at 3456, a 0.2% difference. Both rank at the 54th percentile among all CPUs, and each is listed as a nearest rival of the other with a deltaPct of exactly 0.2%.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2186G has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD chip's additional 2 cores and 4 threads contribute to its strong R15 multi-core performance.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon E-2186G and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U support ECC memory. This is unusual for a mobile processor like the AMD chip and indicates workstation-oriented design in both cases.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2186G boosts to 4.70 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U boosts to 4.50 GHz. Intel's 0.20 GHz advantage in boost clock likely contributes to its wins in the Cinebench R23 tests.

# Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon E-2186G | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 95 W | 15 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | AMD Socket FP6 |

| Architecture | Coffee Lake | Zen 3 |

| Codename | Coffee Lake-S WS | Barcelo-R |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not specified | 10,700 million |

| Die Size | 154 mm² | 180 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics P630 | Radeon Graphics (Vega 8) |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Mobile |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2018-05-30 | 2023-01-03 |

| Launch MSRP | $506 | Not specified |

| Part Number | SR3WR | 100-000000948 |

Both processors share identical specifications for L1 cache (64 KB per core), memory support (DDR4), memory bus (dual-channel), ECC support (true), PCIe (Gen 3, 16 lanes), and unlocked multiplier (false).

# The Verdict

The benchmark data paints a picture of two processors that achieve similar overall performance through fundamentally different means. The Intel Xeon E-2186G leverages high clock speeds — a 3.80 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost — to win the newer Cinebench R23 tests and Geekbench multi-core. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U counters with more cores, more threads, and a larger cache footprint to dominate Cinebench R15.

For users prioritizing newer benchmark performance, the Intel Xeon E-2186G has the edge. Its 13.8% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 12.6% lead in single-core represent substantial advantages in modern rendering workloads. The 9.6% Geekbench multi-core win further solidifies its position for general productivity tasks.

However, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U cannot be dismissed. Its 34.1% victory in Cinebench R15 multi-core demonstrates raw parallel throughput that could benefit legacy applications optimized for many threads. The 28.8% single-core R15 win is even more surprising, suggesting AMD's architecture excels in certain older workload patterns.

The 0.2% overall average score difference is statistically negligible. Both processors sit at the 54th percentile, surrounded by the same group of rivals — Intel Core i7-9700F, AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS, and Intel Core i7-10870H. This is a genuine performance tie in aggregate, with workload-specific divergences.

The production status difference is decisive for new purchases. The Intel Xeon E-2186G is end-of-life, released in 2018, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U is active, released in 2023. The AMD chip also operates at 15 W TDP versus Intel's 95 W, a 6.3x efficiency advantage that makes it suitable for mobile platforms. The Intel chip's $506 launch MSRP provides a reference point, while AMD's pricing is not specified in the data.

# Where Each One Wins

Intel Xeon E-2186G wins in:

• Modern rendering workloads: Cinebench R23 multi-core (11492 vs 10095, 13.8% ahead)
• Current single-threaded tasks: Cinebench R23 single-core (1622 vs 1441, 12.6% ahead)
• General multi-core productivity: Geekbench multi-core (6204 vs 5661, 9.6% ahead)
• High-clock-speed scenarios: 4.70 GHz boost clock provides headroom for bursty workloads
• Server/workstation environments: market segment designation and 95 W TDP suit desktop deployments

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U wins in:

• Legacy multi-threaded applications: Cinebench R15 multi-core (1756 vs 1158, 34.1% ahead)
• Legacy single-threaded applications: Cinebench R15 single-core (229 vs 163, 28.8% ahead)
• Efficiency-sensitive deployments: 15 W TDP versus 95 W represents a massive power advantage
• Mobile platforms: Socket FP6 and active production status enable current laptop designs
• Cache-heavy workloads: 16 MB L3 and 512 KB L2 per core provide more on-die data capacity
• Memory bandwidth: 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s offers an 19.9% theoretical bandwidth advantage

The Geekbench single-core result (1550 vs 1551) is essentially identical, meaning neither chip has a definitive edge in that specific metric. Users should consider whether their workloads resemble Cinebench R15 (AMD favored) or R23 (Intel favored), as the benchmark version differences suggest significant sensitivity to workload characteristics.