AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U vs Intel Core i5-10600K Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded head-to-head data presents a split decision across six benchmark tests, with each processor claiming three wins. The most dramatic divergence appears in the Cinebench suite, where the two CPUs trade blows depending on the workload generation.

In Cinebench R15, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U dominates. Its multicore score of 1756 surpasses the Intel Core i5-10600K's 1220, a 30.5% advantage. The single-core test tells a similar story, with AMD's 229 outpacing Intel's 172, a 24.9% lead. These are substantial margins, and they position the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U as the clear winner in this older rendering benchmark.

The tables turn entirely in Cinebench R23. Here, the Intel Core i5-10600K posts a multicore score of 12106 against AMD's 10095, a 19.9% advantage. The single-core result follows suit, with Intel's 1709 beating AMD's 1441 by 18.6%. The reversal is stark, and it suggests the newer R23 workload interacts very differently with the two architectures.

Geekbench adds another layer of nuance. In multicore, Intel wins with 6393 versus 5661, a 12.9% margin. But in single-core, AMD takes the round with 1551 against Intel's 1477, a 4.8% edge. The single-core Geekbench result is the closest contest in the entire comparison, and it is the only head-to-head test where AMD wins with a single-digit margin.

Across all six tests, the average benchmark scores from the database show how close these parts are overall. The Intel Core i5-10600K has an average benchmark score of 3533, placing it at the 55th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U averages 3456, at the 54th percentile. The database places them in a near tie, with Intel holding a 77-point aggregate edge.

The nearest rivals in the database reinforce this closeness. The Intel Core i5-10600K sits alongside the Intel Xeon W-1290TE at 3532 (0% delta), the Intel Core i3-12300 at 3532 (0% delta), and the Intel Xeon W-2135 at 3530 (0.1% delta). The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U is bracketed by the Intel Xeon E-2186G at 3462 (a 0.2% deficit for AMD), the Intel Core i7-9700F at 3464 (0.2% deficit), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS at 3447 (0.3% advantage), and the Intel Core i7-10870H at 3446 (0.3% advantage). In other words, each processor is surrounded by comparable performers, and neither escapes its weight class.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core i5-10600K is built on the Comet Lake architecture, using a 14 nm process node fabricated by Intel. It is a desktop part in the Core 10th Gen series, released on 2020-04-29 and currently listed as active in production. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U belongs to the 7000 series, based on Zen 3 architecture under the Barcelo-R codename. It uses a 7 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, carries 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die, and was released on 2023-01-03. The node difference is significant: 14 nm versus 7 nm, with the AMD part also benefiting from a separate foundry.

Core counts differ as well. The Intel part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD chip therefore offers two additional physical cores and four additional threads. Cache hierarchies show corresponding differences. Both share 64 KB of L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache differs: Intel uses 256 KB per core, while AMD uses 512 KB per core. The L3 cache is 12 MB shared on the Intel side and 16 MB shared on the AMD side. The larger L2 and L3 caches on the AMD part are consistent with its higher core count and newer architecture.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The Intel Core i5-10600K has a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Intel part runs at a much higher base frequency, which is typical for a desktop processor with a 125 W TDP. The AMD part is a mobile processor with a 15 W TDP, and its lower base clock reflects power constraints. Despite the lower base clock, the AMD part still reaches a competitive boost clock.

Memory support is similar in type but different in bandwidth. Both CPUs support DDR4 memory and use a dual-channel memory bus. The Intel part has a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, while the AMD part offers 51.2 GB/s. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, while the Intel part does not. PCIe support is identical: Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics differ. The Intel Core i5-10600K includes UHD Graphics 630, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U includes Radeon Graphics (Vega 8). The sockets are incompatible: Intel uses Socket 1200, while AMD uses Socket FP6. The multiplier is unlocked on the Intel part, allowing overclocking, while the AMD part is locked. The market segments differ as well, with Intel targeting desktop and AMD targeting mobile.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The Intel Core i5-10600K wins with a score of 12106 against the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U's 10095, a 19.9% advantage.

Q: Which processor wins in Cinebench R15 multicore?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U wins with a score of 1756 against the Intel Core i5-10600K's 1220, a 30.5% advantage.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U have more cores than the Intel Core i5-10600K?

A: Yes, the AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-10600K has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U's 4.50 GHz.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-10600K has an average benchmark score of 3533, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U has an average score of 3456.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i5-10600K does not.

Specification Differences

The two processors diverge on nearly every major specification. The Intel Core i5-10600K uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U uses 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 4.10 GHz for Intel and 2.00 GHz for AMD. Boost clocks are 4.80 GHz for Intel and 4.50 GHz for AMD. TDP is 125 W for Intel and 15 W for AMD. The sockets are Intel Socket 1200 and AMD Socket FP6. The architecture is Comet Lake for Intel and Zen 3 for AMD. The process node is 14 nm for Intel and 7 nm for AMD, with Intel using its own foundry and AMD using TSMC. The AMD part has transistor and die size data recorded at 10,700 million and 180 mm², while the Intel part has no recorded values for either.

Cache configurations differ in L2 and L3. Both have 64 KB of L1 per core. The Intel L2 is 256 KB per core, while the AMD L2 is 512 KB per core. The Intel L3 is 12 MB shared, while the AMD L3 is 16 MB shared. Memory bandwidth is 42.7 GB/s for Intel and 51.2 GB/s for AMD. ECC memory support is absent on Intel and present on AMD. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 630 on Intel and Radeon Graphics (Vega 8) on AMD. The market segment is desktop for Intel and mobile for AMD. The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD part is locked. Release dates are 2020-04-29 for Intel and 2023-01-03 for AMD.

The Verdict

The data supports a split recommendation based on workload and platform. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U is the stronger choice for Cinebench R15 workloads, both multicore and single-core, where it leads by 30.5% and 24.9% respectively. It also wins Geekbench single-core by 4.8%. Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration, larger caches, and ECC support make it a compelling option for mobile systems that prioritize older rendering benchmarks and memory integrity.

The Intel Core i5-10600K is the better pick for Cinebench R23, leading by 19.9% in multicore and 18.6% in single-core. It also wins Geekbench multicore by 12.9%. Its higher base and boost clocks, combined with its unlocked multiplier, make it suited to desktop builds that target newer rendering workloads and overclocking. The aggregate average benchmark scores are close, with Intel at 3533 and AMD at 3456, which means the choice ultimately depends on the specific benchmark and platform requirements. Users who need a desktop part for R23-heavy workflows should lean Intel. Users who need a low-power mobile part with ECC support and strong R15 performance should lean AMD.