AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS vs Intel Xeon 6337P Comparison

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS and Intel Xeon 6337P are two processors that occupy vastly different market segments yet land at nearly identical average benchmark scores. The Ryzen, a mobile part from AMD’s 6000 series aimed at thin-and-light workstations, edges out the Xeon, a server/workstation chip on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture, in overall average score (28549 vs 28333). Both sit at the 80th percentile of all CPUs, and their nearest rivals tell a similar story: the Ryzen trades blows with the Intel Core 5 220H and AMD EPYC 7203P, while the Xeon sits within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS. In head-to-head testing, the Ryzen wins 12 of 17 benchmarks, but the Xeon’s wins are decisive in specific workloads, making this a matchup defined by workload character rather than raw supremacy.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS leads with an average benchmark score of 28549, compared to the Intel Xeon 6337P’s 28333. That is a margin of roughly 0.8%.

Q: How do the two compare in Cinebench multi-core tests?

A: The Ryzen wins every Cinebench multi-core test, but by narrow margins. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen scores 18980 against the Xeon’s 18783, a 1% advantage. The R20 and R15 multi-core tests show the same pattern, with the Ryzen ahead by 1.1% in each.

Q: Where does the Intel Xeon 6337P show its biggest advantage?

A: The Xeon dominates in prime number finding and physics simulation. In PassMark’s find prime numbers test, it scores 108 versus the Ryzen’s 58, a 46.3% advantage. In PassMark physics, it scores 1729 against 1065, leading by 38.4%.

Q: Does the Ryzen have an integrated GPU?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS includes Radeon 680M integrated graphics. The Intel Xeon 6337P has no integrated graphics (listed as N/A), meaning it requires a discrete GPU for display output.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Ryzen supports DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel bus and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Xeon supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, though its memory bandwidth is not listed in the data.

Q: Which chip supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Xeon 6337P supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS does not. This makes the Xeon more suited for error-sensitive server or workstation workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS is the clear winner in memory bandwidth-sensitive and encryption-heavy tasks. Its 37.7% lead in PassMark data encryption (17350 vs 12604) is the largest margin in the entire head-to-head set. It also takes data compression by 14.9% (272838 vs 237373), extended instructions by 17.7% (18091 vs 15366), and integer math by 18.2% (85459 vs 72301). Random string sorting goes to the Ryzen by 9.8% (28693 vs 26135). These wins suggest a chip that excels at general productivity, compression workloads, and cryptographic tasks. The Ryzen also sweeps all six Cinebench tests, though by just 1-1.1% in each, and takes PassMark multithread by 1% (22330 vs 22098).

The Intel Xeon 6337P wins where raw single-thread speed and specialized math matter most. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4104 beats the Ryzen’s 3301 by 19.6%, a substantial gap that carries over to the PassMark singlethread test at the same margin. The Xeon’s 46.3% lead in find prime numbers (108 vs 58) points to strong integer division or specialized instruction efficiency. It also wins floating-point math by 12.1% (53150 vs 46706) and physics by 38.4% (1729 vs 1065). These results position the Xeon as the better choice for simulation, scientific computing, or any workload that leans on floating-point throughput and single-core responsiveness.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS uses Zen 3+ architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 208 mm². It is built on the Rembrandt codename and targets the mobile segment via AMD Socket FP7. The Intel Xeon 6337P uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, on Intel’s 10 nm process with a smaller 163 mm² die. It is a server/workstation part on Intel Socket 1700.

Core counts differ: the Ryzen packs 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Xeon has 6 cores and 12 threads. Cache layouts also diverge. The Ryzen has 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, with 16 MB shared L3. The Xeon has 80 KB L1 and 1.25 MB L2 per core, with 18 MB shared L3. Despite fewer cores, the Xeon’s larger per-core L2 and shared L3 give it a cache advantage in certain workloads.

Feature sets are distinct. The Ryzen includes Radeon 680M integrated graphics, supports DDR5 only, and has PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The Xeon has no iGPU, supports both DDR4 and DDR5, includes ECC memory support, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The Ryzen’s TDP is 35 watts, while the Xeon’s is 80 watts, reflecting the mobile-versus-server positioning. Both have locked multipliers.

Specification Differences

The most obvious differences are in core and thread counts: 8 cores/16 threads for the AMD versus 6 cores/12 threads for the Intel. Clock speeds favor the Xeon, with a 3.50 GHz base and 5.30 GHz boost compared to the Ryzen’s 3.20 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost. TDP is a major split — 35 watts for the Ryzen against 80 watts for the Xeon.

Memory support diverges: the Ryzen is DDR5-only with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, while the Xeon accepts both DDR4 and DDR5 with no bandwidth figure listed. ECC memory is available only on the Xeon. PCIe generation differs, with the Ryzen at Gen 4 (20 lanes) and the Xeon at Gen 5 (16 lanes). The Ryzen has integrated Radeon 680M graphics; the Xeon has none. Process node and foundry differ: 6 nm TSMC for AMD versus 10 nm Intel for the Xeon. Die sizes are 208 mm² for the Ryzen and 163 mm² for the Xeon. The Xeon carries a launch MSRP of $375; the Ryzen has no listed launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results are the closest across the board. The Ryzen wins R15 multi-core with 1913 against 1893 (1.1%), R20 multi-core with 7971 against 7888 (1.1%), and R23 multi-core with 18980 against 18783 (1%). Single-core Cinebench tests show the same 1.1% edge for the Ryzen in R15 (270 vs 267), R20 (1125 vs 1113), and R23 (2679 vs 2651). These are effectively tie-level results, suggesting the two chips have comparable rendering performance despite different core counts and TDPs.

The PassMark suite reveals the real separation. The Ryzen’s biggest win is data encryption at 17350 versus 12604, a 37.7% margin. Data compression follows at 272838 versus 237373 (14.9%), and extended instructions at 18091 versus 15366 (17.7%). Integer math goes to the Ryzen by 18.2% (85459 vs 72301), and random string sorting by 9.8% (28693 vs 26135). PassMark multithread is close, with the Ryzen at 22330 versus 22098 (1%).

The Xeon’s wins are fewer but sharper. PassMark single-thread shows the Xeon at 4104 against 3301, a 19.6% advantage. The find prime numbers test is the most lopsided result in either direction: 108 for the Xeon versus 58 for the Ryzen, a 46.3% swing. Physics favors the Xeon by 38.4% (1729 vs 1065), and floating-point math by 12.1% (53150 vs 46706). These results show a chip that, despite losing the overall benchmark count, delivers decisive wins in targeted scientific and single-threaded scenarios.