AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS vs Intel Core i5-13490F Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F has 10 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS has 8 cores. Both processors feature 16 threads.

Q: How do the two processors compare in single-threaded performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F leads in single-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 3211 versus AMD's 2679, a 16.6% advantage. PassMark single-thread results show a similar gap at 3828 versus 3301, a 13.8% difference.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core i5-13490F has a TDP of 65 watts. This reflects AMD's mobile-focused design versus Intel's desktop-oriented part.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS includes Radeon 680M integrated graphics. The Intel Core i5-13490F has no integrated graphics, meaning a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS supports DDR5 memory exclusively. The Intel Core i5-13490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering more flexibility in platform configuration.

Q: How do the processors compare in overall benchmark averages?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS has an average benchmark score of 28549, while the Intel Core i5-13490F averages 28185. Both sit at the 80th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS is built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt, using TSMC's 6 nm process node. The Intel Core i5-13490F uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. These process differences directly impact power efficiency and thermal characteristics, with AMD's smaller node enabling a 35-watt TDP versus Intel's 65-watt TDP.

Cache hierarchies diverge significantly. AMD allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel's larger cache allocations, particularly the 50% larger L3 pool, contribute to its advantage in latency-sensitive workloads.

The die sizes are comparable at 208 mm² for AMD and 215 mm² for Intel, despite the process node difference. Both processors lack unlocked multipliers, making overclocking unavailable on either platform. AMD uses AMD Socket FP7, while Intel uses Socket 1700, reflecting their different market segments: mobile for AMD, desktop for Intel.

PCIe support differs in generation and lane count. AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Intel's newer PCIe generation enables higher bandwidth for compatible devices, though AMD provides more total lanes. Memory support also diverges: AMD is DDR5-only with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with no recorded bandwidth figure in the database.

The AMD processor's integrated Radeon 680M graphics is a key architectural differentiator, enabling systems without a discrete GPU. Intel's part has no integrated graphics, requiring a separate graphics card for any display output. This architectural choice aligns with their target platforms: AMD for thin-and-light mobile systems, Intel for desktop builds.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-13490F dominates the benchmark comparison, winning 16 of 17 head-to-head tests. Its advantages span rendering, compression, encryption, and physics simulations. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 22747 versus AMD's 18980, a 16.6% lead. The largest single victory comes in PassMark find prime numbers, where Intel scores 114 versus AMD's 58, a 49.1% margin. Physics calculations show a 44.4% advantage for Intel (1915 versus 1065). These results indicate Intel's Raptor Lake architecture excels in computationally intensive, multi-threaded workloads that benefit from its 10-core configuration and larger cache.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS wins exactly one head-to-head benchmark: PassMark integer math, scoring 85459 versus Intel's 83723, a 2.1% lead. This niche victory suggests AMD's Zen 3+ architecture has a slight edge in pure integer arithmetic operations. Beyond that single win, AMD's strengths lie in its platform characteristics rather than raw performance: the 35-watt TDP, integrated graphics, and mobile form factor make it suitable for battery-powered systems where power efficiency matters more than peak throughput.

For users prioritizing maximum performance in desktop applications, content creation, or scientific computing, the Intel Core i5-13490F is the clear choice based on benchmark data. For mobile users needing integrated graphics and lower power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS offers a balanced package despite trailing in raw compute tests.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS | Intel Core i5-13490F |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 680M | None |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2022-04-18 | 2023-02-09 |

| Part Number | 100-000000542100-000000564 | SRMC0 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-13490F establishes a consistent performance lead across nearly every benchmark category. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, Intel scores 2292 against AMD's 1913, a 16.5% margin. The single-core R15 test shows Intel at 323 versus AMD's 270, a 16.4% gap. These early Cinebench results set the pattern for the entire comparison.

Cinebench R20 and R23 reinforce Intel's dominance. In R20 multi-core, Intel scores 9553 versus AMD's 7971, a 16.6% advantage. R20 single-core shows Intel at 1348 against AMD's 1125, a 16.5% difference. R23 multi-core results are 22747 for Intel and 18980 for AMD, a 16.6% gap. R23 single-core delivers 3211 for Intel and 2679 for AMD, also a 16.6% spread. The consistency of these margins across Cinebench versions suggests a stable architectural advantage rather than test-specific variation.

PassMark results show wider disparities in some areas. Data compression favors Intel at 328397 versus 272838, a 16.9% lead. Extended instructions see Intel at 20837 versus AMD's 18091, a 13.2% advantage. Floating-point math gives Intel 60273 against AMD's 46706, a 22.5% margin. Random string sorting shows Intel at 34042 versus AMD's 28693, a 15.7% gap. Multi-thread performance is 26569 for Intel and 22330 for AMD, a 16% difference. Single-thread results are 3828 for Intel and 3301 for AMD, a 13.8% lead.

The most dramatic differences appear in specialized workloads. PassMark find prime numbers shows Intel scoring 114 versus AMD's 58, a 49.1% margin. Physics calculations give Intel 1915 against AMD's 1065, a 44.4% advantage. These extreme gaps indicate Intel's architecture handles certain mathematical and simulation workloads with significantly greater efficiency.

Data encryption shows the narrowest Intel victory at 17902 versus 17350, a 3.1% difference. This near-parity suggests both processors handle cryptographic workloads similarly, despite their architectural differences.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS claims its sole victory in PassMark integer math, scoring 85459 against Intel's 83723. The 2.1% margin is modest but demonstrates that AMD's Zen 3+ core design retains a measurable edge in this specific workload type. Notably, this win occurs despite Intel having two additional cores, indicating AMD's per-core integer performance is competitive.

Overall, the benchmark data shows Intel's Raptor Lake architecture delivering broadly superior performance across rendering, compression, physics, and general-purpose computing. AMD's lone integer math win and its platform efficiency features represent its counterpoints, but the raw performance comparison heavily favors the Intel Core i5-13490F.