AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H and Intel Core Ultra 7 155H are both premium mobile processors that land in the same performance tier, with the Intel part holding a decisive 12-to-3 advantage in head-to-head benchmark wins. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H posts a higher average benchmark score of 32697 compared to the AMD’s 32812, though the AMD part edges ahead by a razor-thin 0.4% in that aggregate metric. Both processors occupy the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating they deliver similar overall capability despite their contrasting designs. The AMD chip is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3+ part built on TSMC’s 6 nm process, while the Intel chip is a 16-core, 22-thread Meteor Lake part on Intel’s 7 nm node. The data reveals a clear split: Intel wins heavily in raw multi-threaded and single-threaded rendering workloads, while AMD counters with decisive victories in data compression, encryption, and extended instruction throughput.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H has an average benchmark score of 32812, which is 0.4% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H’s average score of 32697. This puts the AMD part marginally ahead in the aggregate metric, though both sit at the 83rd percentile.

Q: How do the two compare in multi-core rendering performance?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H wins decisively in multi-core rendering. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 15028 versus AMD’s 12393, a 17.5% advantage. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, Intel leads with 2450 against AMD’s 2085.5, a 14.9% gap.

Q: What are the biggest single-workload wins for the AMD processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H shows its largest margins in PassMark extended instructions, where it scores 19654 versus Intel’s 16456, a 19.4% lead. It also wins PassMark data encryption by 14.2% (18681 vs 16358) and data compression by 6.4% (295214 vs 277353).

Q: Where does the Intel processor show its largest performance lead?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H’s biggest win is in PassMark find prime numbers, where it scores 113 against AMD’s 59, a massive 47.8% advantage. It also leads heavily in PassMark physics (1727 vs 1093, a 36.7% gap) and PassMark floating point math (63703 vs 48276, a 24.2% gap).

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has 16 cores and 22 threads. Intel’s higher core count does not translate into a win in every multi-threaded test, but it does dominate in the primary rendering benchmarks.

Q: Which processor offers higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H’s 76.8 GB/s. Both support DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but Intel’s rated bandwidth is 16.7% higher.

The Verdict

For users prioritizing raw multi-threaded rendering performance, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is the clear choice from the data. It wins Cinebench R23 multi-core by 17.5% (15028 vs 12393) and Cinebench R15 multi-core by 14.9% (2450 vs 2085.5). Its 16 cores and 22 threads also translate into a 36.7% lead in PassMark physics (1727 vs 1093) and a 24.2% lead in floating point math (63703 vs 48276). The Intel part also takes single-thread performance, leading Cinebench R15 single-core by 19.6% (255 vs 205.1) and Cinebench R23 single-core by 15.1% (1743 vs 1480). This makes it the superior option for workloads like video rendering, 3D modeling, and scientific computing that rely on both multi-core scaling and per-core speed.

For users who handle data-heavy or security-sensitive tasks, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H holds the edge. It wins PassMark data encryption by 14.2% (18681 vs 16358) and data compression by 6.4% (295214 vs 277353), indicating better efficiency in these specific instruction paths. Its 19.4% lead in extended instructions (19654 vs 16456) suggests it handles complex instruction sets more effectively. However, these wins are narrower and fewer than Intel’s, so the AMD chip is a niche pick for specialized workloads rather than a general-purpose leader. The overall verdict from the data: Intel wins the majority of tests and the most important rendering benchmarks, making it the default recommendation for most high-performance mobile workloads, with AMD reserved for specific compression and encryption scenarios.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a lopsided contest, with Intel taking 12 of 15 head-to-head matchups. The most striking win for Intel is in PassMark find prime numbers, where it scores 113 versus AMD’s 59, a 47.8% lead that represents the largest delta in the entire dataset. This is followed by PassMark physics, where Intel’s 1727 beats AMD’s 1093 by 36.7%. In floating point math, Intel leads 63703 to 48276, a 24.2% margin. The Cinebench results are consistent with this pattern: Intel wins R23 multi-core by 17.5% (15028 vs 12393), R23 single-core by 15.1% (1743 vs 1480), R15 multi-core by 14.9% (2450 vs 2085.5), and R15 single-core by 19.6% (255 vs 205.1). Even in closer contests, Intel prevails: PassMark multithread sees Intel at 24873 against AMD’s 23417, a 5.9% lead, and PassMark single-thread has Intel at 3468 versus AMD’s 3305, a 4.7% margin. Intel also wins PassMark integer math (86870 vs 86068, a 0.9% lead) and random string sorting (31990 vs 31170, a 2.6% lead).

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H claims three victories, all in PassMark workloads. Its largest win is in extended instructions, where it scores 19654 against Intel’s 16456, a 19.4% advantage. In data encryption, AMD leads 18681 to 16358, a 14.2% margin. The narrowest AMD win is in data compression, where it scores 295214 versus Intel’s 277353, a 6.4% lead. These three wins are significant but do not offset Intel’s dominance across the broader test suite. Notably, the AMD chip does not win a single Cinebench test, and its PassMark multithread score of 23417 trails Intel’s 24873 despite the AMD chip having fewer cores. The data shows that Intel’s architecture delivers superior performance in both rendering and general multi-threaded tasks, while AMD’s wins are confined to specific instruction-level operations.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ substantially in their core configuration and physical characteristics. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has 16 cores and 22 threads. Intel’s base clock is 3.80 GHz compared to AMD’s 3.20 GHz, and Intel’s boost clock is 4.80 GHz versus AMD’s 4.70 GHz. The TDP ratings also diverge: AMD is rated at 45 watts, while Intel is rated at 28 watts, indicating Intel achieves its performance at a lower nominal power draw. The socket types are incompatible, with AMD using AMD Socket FP7 and Intel using Intel BGA 2049. Memory bandwidth favors Intel at 89.6 GB/s versus AMD’s 76.8 GB/s, though both support DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. In terms of PCIe, AMD offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while Intel offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), a trade-off between more lanes on an older standard versus fewer lanes on a newer standard. The release dates are separated by over a year: AMD launched on 2022-04-18, while Intel launched on 2023-12-13. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $503.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is fundamental. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt, part of the 6000 series. It uses a 6 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, with a die size of 208 mm². Its cache structure includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated graphics are Radeon 680M. In contrast, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H uses the Meteor Lake architecture, part of Core Ultra Series 1, on Intel’s 7 nm process. Intel’s cache is larger: 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG 128EU. Intel’s process node is larger at 7 nm compared to AMD’s 6 nm, but Intel’s newer architecture likely compensates given its benchmark wins. Both chips have ECC memory support disabled and locked multipliers. The memory support for Intel is listed as “Depends on motherboard,” while AMD explicitly supports DDR5. The part numbers differ (100-000000542100-000000564 for AMD, SRMZ1 for Intel), and the Intel part has a known launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H wins in scenarios that demand high multi-threaded throughput and single-thread responsiveness. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 makes it the better choice for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the 17.5% lead over AMD’s 12393 directly translates to faster job completion. The 19.6% single-core advantage in Cinebench R15 (255 vs 205.1) benefits applications that rely on per-core speed, such as legacy software or lightly threaded games. The 36.7% lead in PassMark physics (1727 vs 1093) indicates stronger computational physics performance, useful in simulation and engineering workloads. The 47.8% lead in prime number finding (113 vs 59) points to superior integer-heavy algorithmic performance. For general productivity and creative work, Intel’s 12 wins out of 15 tests establish it as the broader performer.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H wins in specialized data-centric tasks. Its 19.4% lead in extended instructions (19654 vs 16456) makes it the pick for workloads that leverage advanced CPU instruction sets, such as certain encryption algorithms or signal processing. The 14.2% lead in data encryption (18681 vs 16358) is a clear win for secure communication or file encryption tasks. The 6.4% lead in data compression (295214 vs 277353) favors applications like database management or file archiving that rely on zlib-style compression. These three wins are specific and measurable, but they represent a narrow slice of typical mobile workloads. For users whose primary tasks involve these data operations, the AMD chip offers a tangible advantage, but for everything else, the benchmark data points to the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H as the superior all-around mobile processor.