AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 vs Intel Core i5-13600T Comparison

The data presents a clear picture: the Intel Core i5-13600T is the stronger performer in the vast majority of head-to-head benchmarks, winning 14 of 17 tests against the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845. The Intel chip’s victories are not marginal either, often exceeding the AMD processor by 6% or more in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. However, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is not without its own distinct advantages, carving out specific niches where it decisively outperforms its rival, particularly in prime number calculations and data encryption. This comparison is less about a single overall winner and more about matching a processor’s specific strengths to the demands of a particular workflow.

The Verdict

For most users, the Intel Core i5-13600T is the clear choice based on the benchmark data. Its performance advantage is consistent and broad, spanning everything from Cinebench rendering tests to PassMark’s general multi-threading and floating-point math. The data shows it is roughly 6% faster in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test and 6.3% faster in the R15 single-core test, making it the superior option for content creation, general productivity, and any workload that benefits from higher raw clock speeds and greater core count. The Intel chip’s 14 cores and 20 threads simply provide a more robust foundation than the AMD’s 8 cores and 16 threads.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845, however, is the specialist’s pick. It wins in three critical areas: data encryption (2.6% faster), extended instructions (2.3% faster), and a stunning 40.2% advantage in the PassMark find prime numbers test. For software that relies heavily on encryption, cryptographic workloads, or specific instruction set extensions, the AMD processor is the better investment. Its higher single-core clock speed of 4.60 GHz and its Zen 3 architecture appear to give it an edge in these specific integer-heavy and security-related tasks. The choice is simple: pick Intel for general excellence, pick AMD for niche, security-focused workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-13600T establishes its dominance in rendering and multi-threaded productivity. In the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, it scores 23,571 versus the AMD’s 22,145, a 6% lead. This pattern repeats across the entire Cinebench suite (R15, R20, R23), where the Intel chip consistently holds a ~6% advantage in both multi-core and single-core tests. The Intel processor also wins in PassMark’s floating-point math, with a score of 70,152 versus 52,105, representing a massive 25.7% lead, which is crucial for scientific computing, 3D rendering, and any task involving complex mathematical calculations. Its superiority in integer math (96,299 vs 94,884) and multithread (27,098 vs 26,054) further cements its position as the general-purpose performance leader.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 wins in three specialized areas. Its most significant victory is in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where it scores 115 versus Intel’s 82, a 40.2% advantage. This suggests its architecture is more efficient at certain types of integer loops. It also edges out the Intel chip in data encryption (19,815 vs 19,320, a 2.6% lead) and extended instructions (21,117 vs 20,651, a 2.3% lead). These wins point to a processor that is particularly well-suited for tasks that are heavy on cryptography, data security, and specialized instruction sets, rather than general-purpose compute.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different designs and manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses the Zen 3 architecture (codenamed Vermeer) on a 7 nm process node from TSMC, with a die size of 74 mm². It is an 8-core, 16-thread processor with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a large 32 MB shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 memory and uses the AMD Socket AM4.

The Intel Core i5-13600T is based on the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a significantly larger die size of 215 mm². This is a hybrid design, featuring 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Its cache structure differs notably, with 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, but a smaller 24 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory and uses the Intel Socket 1700. Notably, it also includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), which the AMD processor lacks entirely. The Intel part also has a 35 W TDP, whereas the AMD chip is rated at 65 W.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T has a higher boost clock at 4.80 GHz, compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's 4.60 GHz.

Q: In which test does the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 have its largest performance advantage?

A: The AMD processor's largest win is in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where it scores 115 versus the Intel's 82, a 40.2% advantage.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-13600T have more cores than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600T has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor supports a faster PCIe standard?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Q: Which chip includes integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T includes UHD Graphics 770. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has no integrated graphics.

Q: How do the processors compare in the Cinebench R23 single-core test?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 3,327 points, which is 6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's score of 3,126.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results are remarkably consistent in favor of Intel, but the AMD chip's wins are significant and revealing. The most striking result is in the PassMark find prime numbers test. Here, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 scores 115, while the Intel Core i5-13600T scores only 82. The deltaPct of 40.2% is the largest gap in either direction in the entire dataset, suggesting a fundamental architectural efficiency for this type of workload on the AMD side.

In contrast, the Intel Core i5-13600T dominates in floating-point operations. Its score of 70,152 in PassMark floating point math is 25.7% higher than the AMD's 52,105. This is a massive difference that would be felt in any application that relies heavily on FPU performance. The Intel chip also shows a consistent ~6% advantage across all Cinebench tests, both single and multi-core. For instance, in Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel scores 23,571 versus the AMD's 22,145, and in R15 single-core, it scores 335 versus 314.

Beyond these headline numbers, the Intel chip wins the remaining tests by smaller but consistent margins. In PassMark integer math, it scores 96,299 versus 94,884 (a 1.5% lead), and in data compression, it scores 337,893 versus 314,363 (a 7% lead). The AMD's wins in data encryption (2.6%) and extended instructions (2.3%) are modest but show it is not without merit in specific areas. Overall, the data paints a picture of a broad Intel victory, punctuated by two specific and dramatic AMD wins that point to its specialized strengths.

Specification Differences

The most critical difference is the core and thread count: the Intel Core i5-13600T has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has 8 cores and 16 threads. This directly contributes to the Intel chip's multi-threaded performance lead. The base clocks are also wildly different, with the AMD running at 3.40 GHz and the Intel at 1.80 GHz, though the Intel chip boosts higher to 4.80 GHz versus the AMD's 4.60 GHz. The TDP is another significant differentiator, with the Intel chip rated at 35 W compared to the AMD's 65 W, indicating the Intel is the more power-efficient design on paper.

The cache hierarchies are structured differently. The AMD uses a smaller per-core L1 (64 KB) and L2 (512 KB) but has a larger shared L3 (32 MB). The Intel uses larger per-core L1 (80 KB) and L2 (1.25 MB) but has a smaller shared L3 (24 MB). The two also support different memory technologies; the AMD supports only DDR4, while the Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The PCIe capabilities differ as well: the AMD offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Intel offers the newer PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Finally, the Intel chip includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), which the AMD does not have, and the two use different sockets (AMD Socket AM4 vs Intel Socket 1700). The Intel Core i5-13600T has a launch MSRP of $255.