AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE and Intel Core i5-14490F occupy distinct positions in the desktop processor landscape, with the database records showing a consistent performance gap across every measured workload. The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE, built on the Zen 3 architecture, achieves an average benchmark score of 29,656 and sits in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. The Core i5-14490F, representing the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, posts an average score of 38,149 and ranks in the 86th percentile. This 8,493 point difference in average scores translates to a substantial overall performance advantage for the Intel part, yet the two chips differ in fundamental ways that extend beyond raw speed.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE reaches a maximum of 4.60 GHz. The Intel part also starts from a lower base clock of 2.50 GHz compared to 3.20 GHz for the AMD chip.

Q: How do the core counts compare between these two CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F features 10 cores and 16 threads, whereas the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Both processors support 16 threads, but Intel accomplishes this with additional physical cores.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings for both processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14490F is rated at 65 watts. This indicates the AMD chip is designed for significantly lower power consumption.

Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE includes Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, as indicated by the N/A designation in its specifications.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE supports DDR4 memory only, using a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Core i5-14490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also with a dual-channel bus, though its bandwidth figure is not recorded in the database.

Q: How do the two processors compare in single-threaded performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F leads in single-thread workloads. In the Cinebench R23 single-core test, it scores 3,247 against 2,507 for the AMD processor, a difference of 22.8 percent. The PassMark single-thread test shows a similar pattern with scores of 3,873 and 3,353 respectively.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE uses the Zen 3 architecture under the Cezanne codename, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14490F employs the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundries. This process node difference is significant: the AMD chip uses 7 nm technology, while Intel's part uses 10 nm, which typically suggests denser transistor packing for the AMD design.

The transistor counts reflect this architectural divergence. The AMD processor contains 10,700 million transistors on a die size of 180 mm². The Intel processor's transistor count is not recorded in the database, but its die size is larger at 215 mm². The cache hierarchies also differ substantially. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and a 16 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel part provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. This gives Intel a larger overall cache footprint, particularly in the L3 tier where it offers 50 percent more capacity.

The memory controllers diverge as well. The AMD processor supports only DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel bus, but its bandwidth is not listed in the database. PCIe connectivity shows a generational gap: the AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This represents a substantial difference in available I/O bandwidth for expansion cards and storage devices.

Integrated graphics present another clear distinction. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE includes Radeon Vega 8 graphics, making it a complete package for systems without a discrete GPU. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, requiring a separate graphics card for any display output. The AMD part also carries a lower TDP of 35 watts compared to 65 watts for Intel, aligning with its smaller process node and lower power envelope. Both processors use locked multipliers, and neither supports ECC memory according to the recorded specifications.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a uniform pattern: the Intel Core i5-14490F wins all 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons. The margin varies by workload, with the smallest gap appearing in integer math and the largest in physics simulation.

In the Cinebench suite, the Intel processor consistently leads by 22.8 percent across both single-core and multi-core tests. The R15 multi-core scores are 2,318 for Intel and 1,789 for AMD, a 22.8 percent difference. The R15 single-core test shows 327 against 252, also a 22.9 percent gap. The R20 and R23 tests repeat this pattern: R20 multi-core gives 9,660 versus 7,458, R20 single-core gives 1,363 versus 1,052, R23 multi-core gives 23,000 versus 17,759, and R23 single-core gives 3,247 versus 2,507. Every one of these results shows the same 22.8 percent advantage for Intel, indicating a consistent architectural efficiency gain.

The PassMark suite reveals a wider spread of performance differences. The smallest margin appears in integer math, where Intel scores 87,844 against 84,004, a difference of only 4.4 percent. Data encryption shows a modest gap of 7.1 percent, with Intel at 18,225 and AMD at 16,937. Single-thread performance in PassMark gives Intel a 13.4 percent lead, scoring 3,873 versus 3,353. Extended instructions show a 21.6 percent gap (21,731 versus 17,029), and random string sorting shows a 23.1 percent difference (35,608 versus 27,373).

The largest margins appear in more specialized workloads. Data compression favors Intel by 25.6 percent, with scores of 340,026 versus 252,937. Floating point math shows a 30 percent advantage for Intel, scoring 66,558 against 46,589. The multithread test gives Intel a 27.2 percent lead (28,662 versus 20,870). The most dramatic differences appear in prime number finding and physics simulation. The prime number test shows Intel at 122 versus AMD at 50, a 59 percent difference. The physics test shows Intel at 2,093 versus 841, also a 59.8 percent difference. These extreme gaps suggest that the Intel processor's higher core count and boost clock provide outsized benefits in these specific computational patterns.

Specification Differences

The recorded specifications reveal several key differences between the two processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14490F uses 10 cores and 16 threads. The base clocks differ: AMD at 3.20 GHz and Intel at 2.50 GHz. The boost clocks differ in the opposite direction: AMD at 4.60 GHz and Intel at 5.00 GHz.

The TDP ratings show a significant gap, with AMD at 35 watts and Intel at 65 watts. The sockets are incompatible: AMD uses Socket AM4, while Intel uses Socket 1700. The process nodes differ, with AMD at 7 nm from TSMC and Intel at 10 nm from Intel. The die sizes are 180 mm² for AMD and 215 mm² for Intel. The transistor count is recorded only for AMD at 10,700 million, with no comparable figure for Intel.

The cache configurations differ in every tier. AMD provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3. Intel provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of L3. Memory support differs, with AMD limited to DDR4 and Intel supporting DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bandwidth is recorded for AMD at 51.2 GB/s, but not for Intel. PCIe support differs, with AMD using Gen 3 and Intel using Gen 5, both with 16 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics are present only on the AMD part, which uses Radeon Vega 8. The Intel part has no integrated graphics. Both processors have locked multipliers, and neither supports ECC memory. The release dates differ: AMD released on September 4, 2024, while Intel released on December 31, 2023. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP in the database. The part numbers also differ: AMD uses 100-000001750, while Intel uses SRN35.

The Verdict

The benchmark data presents a decisive result. The Intel Core i5-14490F wins every single recorded benchmark, with margins ranging from 4.4 percent in integer math to 59.8 percent in physics simulation. The average benchmark score for Intel is 38,149, which is 8,493 points higher than AMD's 29,656. This places the Intel part in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, compared to the 81st percentile for AMD.

The closest comparison to the AMD processor in the database is the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, which scores 29,713 on average, just 0.2 percent higher than the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE. The Intel Core i5-14490F sits near the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, which scores 38,194, a 0.1 percent difference, and the Intel Core i5-13600KF at 38,103. These nearby rivals confirm that both processors are positioned within their respective performance tiers, but the gap between the two tiers is substantial.

The data indicates that the Intel Core i5-14490F is the stronger performer in every workload category recorded. The AMD processor's lower TDP and integrated graphics make it suitable for different system configurations, but in pure computational benchmarks, the Intel part holds a clear and consistent advantage. The 22.8 percent margin in Cinebench tests across all versions suggests a fundamental performance gap that no workload-specific optimization can overcome within the recorded data.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14490F wins in every measured category, but the magnitude of its advantage varies by workload type. For users prioritizing multi-threaded throughput, the Intel part delivers a 27.2 percent lead in the PassMark multithread test and a 22.8 percent lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Data compression shows a 25.6 percent advantage, making the Intel chip the stronger choice for archival and compression tasks. Floating point math shows a 30 percent gap, favoring Intel for scientific and numerical workloads.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE does not win any recorded benchmark, but its profile suggests specific use cases based on its specifications rather than benchmark victories. The 35 watt TDP makes it a low-power option for compact or thermally constrained systems. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics allow for a functional system without a discrete GPU, which the Intel part cannot provide. The AMD processor also uses the mature AM4 socket and supports only DDR4 memory, which may align with existing platform investments.

For workloads where the performance gap is smallest, the AMD processor is less disadvantaged. The integer math test shows only a 4.4 percent difference, and data encryption shows a 7.1 percent gap. These smaller margins suggest that integer-heavy or encryption-focused tasks narrow the gap between the two processors, though Intel still leads. The single-thread PassMark test shows a 13.4 percent difference, indicating that lightly threaded applications also favor Intel but by a smaller margin than multi-threaded workloads.

The data ultimately shows that the Intel Core i5-14490F is the superior performer across all recorded benchmarks, with its largest advantages in physics simulation and prime number finding, where it leads by nearly 60 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE offers lower power consumption, integrated graphics, and a different platform ecosystem, but no benchmark in the database favors it over the Intel part. For any workload represented in these measurements, the Intel processor delivers higher scores.