AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE vs Intel Core i5-13600H Comparison

The Intel Core i5-13600H and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE represent two distinct design philosophies, one aimed at high-performance mobile computing and the other at efficient desktop operation. The recorded data shows a near-split in benchmark victories, with the AMD part taking 9 wins and the Intel part taking 8, yet the margins of those wins tell a much more interesting story. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE dominates the Cinebench suite with consistent 30.2% leads, while the Intel Core i5-13600H counters with decisive wins in several Passmark workloads, including a 77.2% advantage in physics calculations. This is not a simple matter of one processor being faster overall; it is a matter of workload-specific strengths.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE is the clear victor in every Cinebench test, which are heavily weighted toward sustained multi-threaded and single-threaded rendering workloads. Its margins are remarkably consistent, with a 30.2% lead in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests, and the same 30.2% margin in the single-core variants. This consistency suggests a fundamental architectural advantage in this type of workload, not a test-specific quirk. The AMD chip also wins in integer math, data encryption, and extended instruction tests, indicating strong general-purpose processing and cryptographic throughput.

The Intel Core i5-13600H, by contrast, excels in tasks that leverage its higher boost clock and specific execution units. It wins the Passmark multithread test by 11.7%, which is notable given it loses the Cinebench multi-core tests by such a large margin. Its most spectacular win is in the Passmark physics test, where it scores 1490 against the AMD's 841, a 77.2% advantage. It also leads in floating-point math (23.7%), prime number finding (74%), random string sorting (8%), and single-thread performance (8.3%). This split indicates the Intel part is better optimized for certain types of parallel integer and floating-point operations, while the AMD part shines in the more uniform, rendering-style workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. The Intel Core i5-13600H uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H variant, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundries. It features a hybrid design with 12 cores and 16 threads. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and its integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units. The chip is designed for mobile platforms, using the Intel BGA 1744 socket, and has a 45-watt TDP. Its PCIe support is Gen 5 with 8 CPU lanes.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE is a desktop part based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne. It is built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, a more advanced node than Intel's 10 nm. The chip integrates 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a cache configuration of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. Memory support is limited to DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration, with a measured memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. Its integrated graphics are Radeon Vega 8. The chip uses the AMD Socket AM4, has a 35-watt TDP, and provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes. The AMD part also has a higher base clock at 3.20 GHz versus 2.80 GHz, but the Intel chip has a higher boost clock at 4.80 GHz versus 4.60 GHz.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking data points are the Cinebench results. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE scores 17759 against the Intel's 12402, a 30.2% difference. The single-core R23 test shows a similar story: AMD scores 2507, Intel scores 1750, again a 30.2% delta. This pattern repeats across R15 and R20, with the AMD part consistently holding a 30.2% lead in both multi-core and single-core tests. For rendering and heavily threaded content creation, the AMD part is decisively faster.

However, the Passmark suite reveals the Intel part's strengths. In the physics test, the Intel Core i5-13600H scores 1490, a 77.2% improvement over the AMD's 841. This is the largest delta in either direction. The Intel part also dominates in prime number finding, scoring 87 versus 50, a 74% lead. Floating-point math goes to Intel by 23.7% (57618 vs 46589). In data compression, the Intel part wins by 5.9% (267936 vs 252937). The Passmark multithread test, which is a different measure than Cinebench, also favors Intel, with a score of 23304 versus 20870, an 11.7% advantage. Even in single-thread Passmark, Intel leads with 3631 versus 3353, an 8.3% margin.

The AMD part still has notable Passmark wins. It leads in integer math by 6.4% (84004 vs 78658), data encryption by 5.2% (16937 vs 16061), and extended instructions by 7.1% (17029 vs 15817). The AMD wins are consistent but generally smaller in the Passmark suite, while its Cinebench wins are overwhelming. The Intel wins in Passmark are larger and more varied, showcasing a different kind of computational strength.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE is significantly faster, scoring 17759 compared to the Intel Core i5-13600H's 12402, a 30.2% advantage.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-13600H win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the Intel part wins 8 of the 17 head-to-head tests. Its biggest wins are in Passmark physics (77.2% ahead), Passmark find prime numbers (74% ahead), and Passmark floating-point math (23.7% ahead).

Q: What is the difference in core counts?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600H has 12 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Both parts support 16 threads.

Q: Which processor supports newer memory types?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600H supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE supports only DDR4.

Q: How do their single-thread Passmark scores compare?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600H scores 3631, which is 8.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE's score of 3353.

Q: Which chip has a higher base clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE has a higher base clock of 3.20 GHz, compared to the Intel Core i5-13600H's base clock of 2.80 GHz.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on workload type. For users whose primary tasks are rendering, video encoding, or any application that scales well across a uniform set of cores, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE is the superior choice. Its 30.2% lead across all Cinebench versions is a strong indicator of sustained multi-threaded performance, and it also wins in integer math and encryption. This makes it a capable desktop processor for content creation and productivity.

For users running a mix of general-purpose tasks, particularly those involving physics simulations, floating-point calculations, or rapid data sorting, the Intel Core i5-13600H offers compelling advantages. Its 77.2% lead in Passmark physics and 23.7% lead in floating-point math are significant. The Intel part also holds a lead in the Passmark multithread test despite losing Cinebench, and it edges out the AMD chip in single-thread Passmark performance. Its support for DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 also gives it a forward-looking platform advantage. The choice depends on whether the workload aligns with the AMD's rendering strength or the Intel's varied computational wins.