AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE vs Intel Core i5-13500HX Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE and Intel Core i5-13500HX are both 81st-percentile performers, yet they achieve parity through entirely different means. The Intel chip wins 15 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, but the AMD processor claims the two most dramatic single-thread victories, including a 44.9% blowout in Cinebench R23 single-core. This is a contest between a power-efficient desktop APU and a high-core-count mobile powerhouse, where the data resolves into a simple verdict: the Intel wins nearly everything, but the AMD wins the workloads that matter most for snappy responsiveness.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-13500HX is the clear victor in raw throughput. Across the head-to-head suite, it dominates multithreaded rendering, physics simulation, and integer math. Its 14 cores and 20 threads give it a structural advantage in parallel workloads, and the benchmark results confirm this: it leads by 37.5% in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 23.8% in R20 multi-core, and 24.8% in PassMark multithread. The data shows a pattern of consistent, double-digit wins in anything that scales with core count.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE wins in exactly one meaningful category: sustained single-core efficiency. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2507 demolishes the Intel's 1730.5, a 44.9% margin. In Cinebench R15 single-core, both chips tie at 252. The AMD also wins the R23 multi-core comparison by a slim 3.1% margin (17759 vs 18334), which is remarkable given the Intel's extra cores. This suggests the AMD's Zen 3 architecture extracts more performance per thread, even when the Intel's higher core count should overwhelm it.

For practical use, the split is clean. The Intel is the choice for video rendering, physics simulations, data compression, and any task that can use 14 cores. The AMD is the choice for single-threaded applications, legacy software, and scenarios where the 35W TDP matters more than peak multi-core output. The Intel's lead in PassMark single-thread (3582 vs 3353, a 6.4% margin) is notable, but the AMD's R23 single-core advantage is far larger and more indicative of real-world responsiveness.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from opposite ends of the design spectrum. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE is a 7nm TSMC part with Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel Core i5-13500HX is a 10nm Intel part with Raptor Lake architecture, featuring 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

The cache hierarchy reveals different philosophies. The AMD uses 64KB of L1 per core, 512KB of L2 per core, and 16MB of L3 cache. The Intel uses 80KB of L1 per core, 2MB of L2 per core, and 24MB of shared L3. The Intel's larger L3 and per-core L2 should help in cache-sensitive workloads, yet the AMD's R23 single-core score suggests its cache hierarchy is more efficient for single-threaded tasks.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD supports only DDR4 in dual-channel mode, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, though its memory bandwidth figure is not listed. The AMD lacks ECC memory support, while the Intel includes it. PCIe connectivity differs significantly: the AMD offers Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel offers Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD pairs with Radeon Vega 8, while the Intel uses UHD Graphics 710. The AMD is a desktop part on Socket AM4, while the Intel is a mobile part on BGA 1964. The AMD has a locked multiplier, whereas the Intel has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD launched on 2024-09-04, while the Intel launched on 2023-01-03.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single win in the entire comparison belongs to the AMD in Cinebench R23 single-core. The AMD scores 2507 against the Intel's 1730.5, a 44.9% advantage. This is not a marginal edge; it is a generational gap in single-thread performance. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the two chips tie exactly at 252, which is curious given the R23 result. The data suggests the R23 workload is more sensitive to the AMD's architectural advantages.

The Intel's biggest wins come in physics and prime number finding. In PassMark physics, the Intel scores 1634 against the AMD's 841, a 48.5% margin. In PassMark find prime numbers, the Intel scores 98 against the AMD's 50, a 49% margin. These are the two largest Intel victories, and they highlight the AMD's weakness in specific floating-point and integer workloads.

The Intel also dominates in multi-core rendering. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Intel scores 2863 against the AMD's 1789, a 37.5% margin. In Cinebench R20 multi-core, the Intel scores 9792 against the AMD's 7458, a 23.8% margin. The gap narrows in R23 multi-core, where the Intel scores 18334 against the AMD's 17759, a 3.1% margin. This suggests the AMD's per-core efficiency partially compensates for its lower core count in the R23 workload.

In PassMark integer math, the Intel wins 96195 to 84004, a 12.7% margin. In floating-point math, the Intel wins 70885 to 46589, a 34.3% margin. In data compression, the Intel wins 331896 to 252937, a 23.8% margin. In data encryption, the Intel wins 19267 to 16937, a 12.1% margin. In extended instructions, the Intel wins 20200 to 17029, a 15.7% margin. In random string sorting, the Intel wins 36373 to 27373, a 24.7% margin. The pattern is consistent: the Intel wins every multi-threaded PassMark test by double digits.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE wins Cinebench R23 single-core with 2507 against the Intel's 1730.5, a 44.9% margin. In Cinebench R15 single-core, they tie at 252.

Q: How big is the Intel's multi-core advantage?

A: The Intel leads by 37.5% in Cinebench R15 multi-core (2863 vs 1789), 23.8% in R20 multi-core (9792 vs 7458), and 24.8% in PassMark multithread (27753 vs 20870). The gap narrows to 3.1% in R23 multi-core.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500HX supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE does not.

Q: What are the core and thread counts?

A: The AMD has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, slightly higher than the AMD's 4.60 GHz.

Q: What is the Intel's launch MSRP?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500HX has a launch MSRP of $326.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear recommendation for most users: the Intel Core i5-13500HX is the superior processor for multi-threaded workloads. It wins 15 of 17 benchmarks, with decisive margins in physics (48.5%), prime number finding (49%), and multi-core rendering (37.5% in R15). Its 14 cores and 20 threads provide a structural advantage that the AMD cannot overcome, despite the AMD's higher per-thread efficiency.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE is the better choice for users who prioritize single-thread performance above all else. Its 44.9% win in Cinebench R23 single-core is the single largest margin in the entire comparison, and it also wins R23 multi-core by 3.1%. For desktop users on Socket AM4 with DDR4 memory, the AMD offers a compelling combination of low power (35W TDP) and strong single-core performance. However, the Intel's 55W TDP and mobile socket make it a different class of product entirely.

For creators, data analysts, and anyone running parallel workloads, the Intel is the obvious pick. For users with single-threaded legacy applications or those who value the AMD's R23 multi-core edge, the AMD is defensible. But the benchmark data overwhelmingly favors the Intel in raw performance, and the only reason to choose the AMD is a specific need for its single-core dominance or its desktop platform.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE | Intel Core i5-13500HX |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 14 |

| Threads | 16 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 35W | 55W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel BGA 1964 |

| Architecture | Zen 3 | Raptor Lake |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 180 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Launch Date | 2024-09-04 | 2023-01-03 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $326 |