AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE vs Intel Core 7 251E Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE and Intel Core 7 251E occupy very different performance positions according to the database. The AMD part carries a full suite of 17 benchmark scores across Cinebench and Passmark workloads, while the Intel Core 7 251E has no recorded benchmark results in the database. This asymmetry means the AMD processor demonstrates measurable wins in every available test category, from single-threaded responsiveness to heavily threaded rendering work.

For multi-core workloads, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE delivers strong results. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,759 points places it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database. The Cinebench R20 multi-core result of 7,458 and R15 multi-core score of 1,789 reinforce this pattern across different rendering engine versions. Passmark multi-thread testing shows a score of 20,870, while integer math reaches 84,004 and floating-point math hits 46,589, indicating robust throughput for computational tasks that scale across the processor's 8 cores and 16 threads.

Single-thread performance is equally well documented. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,507, R20 single-core score of 1,052, and R15 single-core score of 252 all point to strong per-core efficiency. Passmark single-thread testing records 3,353 points, and the extended instructions score of 17,029 shows solid SIMD and instruction-set throughput. These results matter for lightly threaded applications such as legacy software, certain database operations, and interactive workloads where a single core dominates.

The Intel Core 7 251E, by contrast, has zero recorded benchmarks and an average benchmark score of zero. Its percentile rank of 50 places it at the median of all CPUs, but this figure appears derived from its specification position rather than measured performance. The database contains no Cinebench or Passmark scores for this processor, so no direct wins can be attributed to it. The processor's architectural specifications, including 24 cores, 32 threads, and a 5.60 GHz boost clock, suggest substantial theoretical potential, but the absence of measured data prevents confirmation.

The AMD processor's wins are therefore comprehensive but one-sided due to data availability. In the database's current state, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE wins every benchmark category it participates in, while the Intel part has no verified results to contest those wins.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 7 251E has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock speed difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE boosts to 4.60 GHz, while the Intel Core 7 251E boosts to 5.60 GHz, a 1.00 GHz advantage for the Intel part.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE has an average benchmark score of 29,656, while the Intel Core 7 251E has an average benchmark score of 0 due to having no recorded benchmark results.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core 7 251E has a TDP of 65 watts.

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 251E support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 7 251E supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE does not.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE uses a 7 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core 7 251E uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE has 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core 7 251E has 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE and Intel Core 7 251E. The headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty, and neither winsA nor winsB shows any recorded victories. This absence of direct comparison data means the analysis must rely on the AMD processor's standalone benchmark suite and the Intel processor's lack of any measured results.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,759 represents its strongest rendering result. The R20 version of the same test shows 7,458 points, and the R15 version records 1,789 points. These scores, combined with the Passmark multi-thread result of 20,870, indicate consistent multi-core capability across different benchmark generations and methodologies.

In single-threaded tests, the AMD processor scores 2,507 in Cinebench R23, 1,052 in R20, and 252 in R15. The Passmark single-thread score of 3,353 aligns with these results, showing coherent per-core performance. The Passmark physics score of 841 and the prime number finding score of 50 provide additional data points for specialized workloads.

Data-centric workloads show the AMD processor's strengths. Passmark data compression scores 252,937, while data encryption records 16,937. Random string sorting reaches 27,373. These results indicate the processor handles data transformation and manipulation tasks effectively across its 8 cores.

The Intel Core 7 251E has no benchmark scores to compare against these figures. Its specification sheet lists a 5.60 GHz boost clock, 24 cores, and 32 threads, which theoretically positions it above the AMD part in raw multi-thread capacity. However, without measured results, the database cannot confirm any performance advantage. The AMD processor's 81st percentile ranking versus the Intel processor's 50th percentile further illustrates the gap between measured performance and specification-only assessment.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every core specification category. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 7 251E uses 24 cores and 32 threads. This represents a 16-core and 16-thread advantage for the Intel part on paper.

Clock speeds diverge significantly. The AMD processor has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel processor has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The Intel part's boost advantage of 1.00 GHz comes with a lower base clock by 1.10 GHz.

Power consumption differs substantially. The AMD processor has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 65 watts. This 30-watt difference places the AMD part in a lower power envelope, suitable for more compact cooling solutions.

Memory support shows clear divergence. The AMD processor supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part's bandwidth advantage of 38.4 GB/s reflects its newer memory controller capabilities.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation and lane count. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This gives the Intel part two full generations of PCIe bandwidth advantage for expansion devices and graphics.

ECC memory support is exclusive to the Intel processor. The Intel Core 7 251E supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE does not. This makes the Intel part suitable for error-correcting memory configurations in reliability-sensitive environments.

The socket and platform differ completely. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. These are incompatible platforms requiring different motherboards.

The launch MSRP for the Intel Core 7 251E is $384. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE has no launch MSRP recorded in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE uses the Zen 3 architecture with the codename Cezanne, belonging to the 5000 series generation. It is manufactured on a 7 nm process node by TSMC, containing 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The Intel Core 7 251E uses the codename Bartlett Lake in the Core 7 generation, manufactured on a 10 nm process node by Intel with a 257 mm² die size. The transistor count for the Intel part is not recorded in the database.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part's larger per-core L2 cache and more than double the L3 cache suggest a different cache design philosophy aimed at feeding its higher core count.

Integrated graphics differ. The AMD processor includes Radeon Vega 8 graphics, while the Intel processor includes UHD Graphics 770. Both provide integrated display output, but the database records no benchmark comparisons between these GPU units.

The architecture generations reflect different development timelines. The AMD Zen 3 architecture represents a mature design iteration, while Bartlett Lake appears as a newer Intel codename. The release dates confirm this: the AMD processor entered production on September 4, 2024, while the Intel processor entered production on January 12, 2025, approximately four months later.

The market segment for both processors is desktop. Both have locked multipliers, meaning they do not support unlocked overclocking. The AMD processor's part number is 100-000001750, while the Intel processor's part number is SRQDUQ657.

The production status for both processors is listed as active. The AMD processor's foundry is TSMC, while the Intel processor's foundry is Intel itself. This difference in manufacturing partner reflects each company's respective fabrication strategies.