AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G vs Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G edges out the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 with an average benchmark score of 4296 versus 4285, a difference of just 0.3%. Both processors sit at the 58th percentile among all CPUs, indicating near-identical overall standing.

Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 wins decisively, scoring 14815 versus the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G's 12157. This represents a 17.9% advantage for Intel in this heavy multi-threaded workload.

Q: What about single-core performance?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 also leads in Cinebench R23 single-core, scoring 2091 against the AMD's 1500, a 28.3% margin. However, in the older Cinebench R15 single-core test, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G wins with 241 points versus 210, a 14.8% lead.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 has 18 cores and 36 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G has 8 cores and 16 threads. Intel's core count advantage is substantial.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 has a TDP of 135 watts. AMD's chip draws significantly less power.

Q: Are both processors still in production?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is listed as "Active" production status, while the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 is marked as "End-of-life."

Architecture Differences

The architecture gap between these two processors is vast, reflecting different design eras and market intents. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is built on the Zen 3 architecture (codename Cezanne) using a 7 nm process at TSMC, packing 10,700 million transistors into a 180 mm² die. In contrast, the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 uses the older Haswell architecture (codename Haswell-EP) on Intel's 22 nm process, with a much larger die size of 662 mm² and no listed transistor count.

The core counts diverge sharply. The AMD part offers 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Xeon provides 18 cores and 36 threads. Clock speeds tell the opposite story: the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G runs at a 3.80 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.60 GHz, whereas the Xeon E5-4669 v3 is limited to a 2.10 GHz base and 2.90 GHz boost. This explains why the AMD chip wins in some single-threaded scenarios despite having fewer cores.

Cache configurations also differ meaningfully. Both share 64 KB of L1 cache per core, but the AMD has 512 KB of L2 per core versus Intel's 256 KB per core. In L3 cache, Intel holds a massive advantage with 45 MB shared versus AMD's 16 MB. The memory interfaces follow suit: AMD uses dual-channel DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, while Intel uses quad-channel DDR4 with 68.3 GB/s. Both support ECC memory, which is notable for the desktop-oriented AMD part.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G includes integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics, while the Xeon E5-4669 v3 has no integrated graphics at all. PCIe lanes also differ: AMD provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while Intel offers Gen 3 with 40 lanes. The AMD chip fits Socket AM4, while Intel uses Socket 2011-3. Finally, the AMD processor is from the 5000 series and released in 2021, while the Xeon came in 2015 as part of the Haswell-EP generation.

The Verdict

The data presents a curious split personality. For users prioritizing raw multi-threaded throughput in modern rendering workloads, the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 demonstrates clear superiority in Cinebench R23 multi-core, scoring 14815 versus 12157. That 17.9% lead aligns with its massive core and thread advantage (18 cores/36 threads versus 8 cores/16 threads) and larger 45 MB L3 cache.

However, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G wins the older Cinebench R15 multi-core test with 1956 points versus 1493, a 31% margin. This contradiction suggests the Xeon's advantage emerges specifically in newer, more scalable workloads like R23. The AMD part also dominates in Cinebench R15 single-core (241 versus 210, a 14.8% win) and offers dramatically better energy efficiency with a 65-watt TDP versus Intel's 135 watts.

The launch MSRP for the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 is $7007. The AMD part has no listed launch MSRP. Given that the Intel chip is end-of-life while AMD remains active, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is the more future-proof choice for most desktop scenarios. The Xeon targets server/workstation environments where its core count and quad-channel memory bandwidth matter more than clock speed or power draw. Benchmark results indicate these are fundamentally different tools: AMD for responsive, efficient desktop work; Intel for legacy multi-socket server deployments.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G | Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 |

|-------|----------------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 8 | 18 |

| Threads | 16 | 36 |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 135 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 2011-3 |

| Architecture | Zen 3 | Haswell |

| Codename | Cezanne | Haswell-EP |

| Generation | Ryzen 7 (Zen 3 (Cezanne)) | Xeon E5 (Haswell-EP) |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 22 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 180 mm² | 662 mm² |

| Transistors | 10,700 million | Not listed |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 45 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Quad-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 68.3 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes | Gen 3, 40 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 | None |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Server/Workstation |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2021-05-31 | 2015-05-31 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $7007 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data reveals a fascinating reversal across test generations. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G delivers 1956 points against the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3's 1493, winning by 31%. This is a striking outcome given the Xeon's 10 additional cores and 20 additional threads. The likely explanation lies in clock speed: AMD's 3.80 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost dwarf Intel's 2.10 GHz base and 2.90 GHz boost, and older Cinebench versions scale less efficiently with core counts.

In Cinebench R15 single-core, AMD wins again with 241 points versus 210, a 14.8% margin. This is consistent with the clock speed advantage and Zen 3's superior per-core efficiency over Haswell architecture.

The story flips in Cinebench R23. The Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 scores 14815 in multi-core versus AMD's 12157, winning by 17.9%. This newer benchmark better exploits the Xeon's 18 cores and 36 threads, along with its 45 MB shared L3 cache. The quad-channel memory interface with 68.3 GB/s bandwidth also helps feed those cores more effectively.

In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel wins again with 2091 points versus 1500, a 28.3% lead. This is surprising given AMD's higher clocks. The data suggests that R23's single-core test may benefit from the Xeon's larger cache or other architectural features specific to the Haswell-EP design. The win count is tied at 2-2, with each processor taking two benchmark victories.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G wins in legacy and lighter multi-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1956 versus 1493 shows a 31% advantage, meaning applications that resemble this older test will favor AMD heavily. The 14.8% single-core win in R15 (241 versus 210) reinforces this, making the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G the better choice for older software, general desktop responsiveness, and tasks that rely on high clock speeds rather than massive parallel scaling.

The Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 wins in modern, heavily threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14815 versus 12157 (17.9% lead) indicates that contemporary rendering, simulation, and content-creation tools that scale well with core counts will perform better on the Xeon. The 28.3% single-core win in R23 (2091 versus 1500) is also notable, though it presents a puzzle: why does the lower-clocked Xeon win a single-threaded test in R23 but lose in R15? The data suggests that R23's single-core test may be more sensitive to the Xeon's larger L3 cache or memory bandwidth.

The AMD part also wins decisively on efficiency and integration. With a 65-watt TDP versus 135 watts, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G delivers comparable overall performance at half the power envelope. It includes Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a discrete GPU in basic systems. Its active production status means ongoing availability, while the Xeon is end-of-life.

For desktop users running mixed workloads, legacy applications, or seeking an all-in-one solution with integrated graphics, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is the data-backed choice. For server or workstation deployments running modern, parallelized applications where the 18 cores and 36 threads can be fully utilized, the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 offers measurable advantages despite its age and higher power consumption. The 40 PCIe lanes and quad-channel memory bandwidth further support server roles, while the 16 PCIe lanes and dual-channel memory of the AMD part suffice for typical desktop configurations.