AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G vs Intel Xeon E-2288G Comparison

The Intel Xeon E-2288G and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G are both 8-core, 16-thread processors, but they target different markets and deliver sharply contrasting performance profiles. The data shows a clear split: AMD’s Zen 3 part wins the older Cinebench R15 and Geekbench tests, while Intel’s Coffee Lake chip dominates the newer Cinebench R23 workload. This creates a nuanced decision for builders, heavily dependent on which applications are prioritized. The benchmark results indicate that neither CPU is a universal winner, making the choice a matter of workload alignment rather than raw superiority.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking discrepancy appears in Cinebench R23. The Intel Xeon E-2288G scores 14,817 points in multi-core, which is 21.9% ahead of the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G’s 12,157. The single-core gap is even larger: Intel posts 2,091 versus AMD’s 1,500, a 39.4% advantage. This is a massive swing in favor of Intel, suggesting that the older architecture is particularly well-tuned for the AVX-512-inclusive R23 workload, or that the benchmark’s scaling favors the Xeon’s higher 5.00 GHz boost clock. In this test, Intel is not just faster; it is categorically dominant.

However, the tables turn completely in the older Cinebench R15 suite. Here, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G scores 1,956 in multi-core, beating the Intel part’s 1,493 by 23.7%. The single-core result also favors AMD, 241 to 210, a 12.9% lead. This is a complete reversal of the R23 results, which is unusual and highlights how different benchmark generations can stress silicon in different ways. The R15 numbers are closer to what one might expect from a newer 7 nm part, but the R23 results contradict that expectation.

Geekbench results further muddy the waters. The Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G wins multi-core with 7,947 points versus 7,639 for the Xeon, a modest 3.9% margin. The single-core Geekbench test is a more decisive victory for AMD, with 1,976 points against Intel’s 1,632, a 17.4% lead. Across the six head-to-head tests, AMD wins four, but Intel’s two wins are by enormous margins. The average benchmark scores reflect this: Intel sits at 4,373 while AMD is at 4,296, making the Xeon 1.8% ahead on average, according to the nearestRivals data. This average is skewed by Intel’s massive R23 wins, but the individual results show a more complex picture.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion: the Intel Xeon E-2288G is the better choice for single-threaded and AVX-heavy workloads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is superior for general multi-threaded tasks and legacy benchmark compatibility. If your primary applications resemble Cinebench R23—which often indicates modern, heavily optimized rendering or scientific workloads—the Intel part’s 39.4% single-core lead and 21.9% multi-core lead make it the obvious pick. The Xeon’s percentile rank is 58, matching the Ryzen’s 58, but the distribution of wins matters more than the aggregate.

Conversely, if your software stack behaves more like Cinebench R15 or Geekbench, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is the safer bet. Its 23.7% multi-core win in R15 and 17.4% single-core win in Geekbench indicate a more balanced architecture that handles older code paths efficiently. The AMD part also does this with a 65 W TDP versus Intel’s 95 W, making it the more power-efficient option, though the benchmark data does not directly measure power consumption. For a server or workstation buyer, the choice hinges on the specific software environment. There is no tie-breaker here; the workloads dictate the winner.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon E-2288G wins in scenarios that favor high boost clocks and modern instruction sets. Its 5.00 GHz boost clock is the highest among the two, and the R23 results suggest it excels in applications that can leverage that frequency. This includes single-threaded database queries, lightly threaded financial modeling, or any code that relies on per-core performance. The 39.4% margin in R23 single-core is the most significant advantage in the entire comparison, making Intel the clear choice for latency-sensitive, single-threaded tasks. The Xeon also has a slight edge in average benchmark score, 4,373 versus 4,296, which is a 1.8% delta according to the nearestRivals data.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G wins in broader multi-threaded scenarios, particularly those represented by Cinebench R15 and Geekbench. The 23.7% lead in R15 multi-core is substantial, and the 3.9% lead in Geekbench multi-core confirms that AMD’s Zen 3 architecture handles parallel workloads efficiently. This makes the Ryzen a strong candidate for video encoding, 3D rendering in older engines, or any task that scales well across all 16 threads. Its 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, compared to Intel’s 42.7 GB/s, also suggests better performance in memory-bound workloads, though the benchmark data does not isolate this factor. The Ryzen’s Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics also provide a more capable iGPU than Intel’s HD Graphics P630, though neither is benchmarked here.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2288G scores 14,817, which is 21.9% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G’s 12,157.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, it wins Cinebench R15 multi-core (1,956 versus 1,493, a 23.7% lead), R15 single-core (241 versus 210, a 12.9% lead), Geekbench multi-core (7,947 versus 7,639, a 3.9% lead), and Geekbench single-core (1,976 versus 1,632, a 17.4% lead).

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each CPU?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2288G has an average score of 4,373, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G has an average score of 4,296. This puts Intel 1.8% ahead, according to the nearestRivals data.

Q: Do both CPUs have the same number of cores and threads?

A: Yes, both have 8 cores and 16 threads, according to the specification data.

Q: Which CPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2288G has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G’s 4.60 GHz.

Q: Are both CPUs still in production?

A: No, the Intel Xeon E-2288G is marked as end-of-life, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is listed as active production.

Architecture Differences

The two chips represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Xeon E-2288G uses the Coffee Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 14 nm process with a die size of 180 mm². It is part of the Xeon E-2200 series, specifically the Coffee Lake-S WS generation. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G uses the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne, built on TSMC’s 7 nm process. It also has a die size of 180 mm² but packs 10,700 million transistors, compared to the Intel part’s unspecified transistor count. Both have 8 cores and 16 threads, but AMD’s L2 cache is 512 KB per core versus Intel’s 256 KB per core, while both share 16 MB of L3 cache.

The process node difference is significant, but the benchmark results do not consistently favor the smaller node. The Intel part’s higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus AMD’s 4.60 GHz appears to be a key factor in the R23 wins. Both support DDR4 memory and have ECC support, but AMD’s memory bandwidth is listed at 51.2 GB/s versus Intel’s 42.7 GB/s. The integrated graphics differ: Intel uses HD Graphics P630, while AMD uses Radeon Vega 8. Both are locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), but the Intel part has a launch MSRP of $539, while AMD’s launch MSRP is not provided. The Intel chip is end-of-life, while the AMD chip is active, which may affect availability but not benchmark performance.

Specification Differences

The key specification differences are clear from the data. The base clock differs: Intel runs at 3.70 GHz, AMD at 3.80 GHz. The boost clock shows Intel at 5.00 GHz and AMD at 4.60 GHz, a 0.4 GHz spread. TDP is a major difference: Intel draws 95 W while AMD draws 65 W, making the Ryzen the more power-efficient part on paper. The sockets are incompatible: Intel uses LGA 1151, AMD uses AM4. The process nodes are 14 nm for Intel and 7 nm for AMD. Memory bandwidth is higher on AMD at 51.2 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s. L2 cache is 256 KB per core on Intel versus 512 KB per core on AMD. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $539, while AMD’s is not listed. The production status differs, with Intel end-of-life and AMD active. These differences, combined with the benchmark results, provide a full picture for a builder deciding between the two.