AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE and the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 occupy very different corners of the processor market, yet benchmark results place them in a surprisingly close contest. The data shows the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE winning all six head-to-head Cinebench comparisons, but the margin is consistently narrow, ranging from 5.9% to 6.2%. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD chip scores 15,699 against the Xeon's 14,815, a 6% advantage. Single-core performance tells a similar story: the Ryzen leads with 2,216 points to 2,091, again a 6% gap. The pattern holds across older Cinebench versions — R20 multi-core shows 6,593 vs 6,222 (6%), and R15 multi-core shows 1,582 vs 1,493 (6%). The largest single delta is in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the Ryzen's 223 points edge out the Xeon's 210 by 6.2%. What makes these results remarkable is the hardware behind them: the Ryzen packs 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Xeon brings 18 cores and 36 threads to the table. Despite having fewer than half the cores, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE consistently outperforms the Xeon across every tested workload.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear sweep for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE, but the narrow deltas invite deeper questioning. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen scores 15,699 versus the Xeon's 14,815 — a 6% lead. This result is counterintuitive given the Xeon's 18 cores and 36 threads, which should theoretically dominate a 16-thread part in heavily parallel workloads. The explanation lies in the architectural gap between the two chips, which the data suggests is substantial. The Ryzen's single-core advantage is even more pronounced in relative terms: 2,216 vs 2,091 in R23 single-core (6%), and 930 vs 878 in R20 single-core (5.9%). These numbers indicate that the Zen 2 architecture's per-core efficiency far outpaces the aging Haswell design from Intel.

The average benchmark scores reinforce this narrative. The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE posts an average score of 4,411 across all tests, while the Xeon E5-4669 v3 manages 4,285 — a difference of roughly 3%. Both chips land in the 58th percentile of all CPUs, which suggests they occupy a similar overall performance tier despite their vastly different designs. When placed against their nearest rivals, the Ryzen's competitive position is tight: it sits only 0.9% above the Intel Xeon E-2288G (4,373) and 1.3% above the AMD EPYC 7232P (4,354), while trailing the Intel Core i7-9800X by 1% and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE by 1.3%. The Xeon's nearest rivals tell a similar story of tight clustering: it sits 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and 0.8% below the Intel Core i7-7820X, while leading the Intel Xeon W-2140B by 0.3% and the Intel Core i7-1265U by 0.9%. This suggests both chips are competitive within their respective market segments, but the Ryzen's wins in every head-to-head test are statistically meaningful given the consistency of the 6% margin.

Architecture Differences

The architectural chasm between these two processors explains the benchmark results better than any single specification. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE uses a 7 nm process node manufactured by TSMC, while the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 relies on Intel's older 22 nm process. This node advantage translates directly into power efficiency and clock speeds: the Ryzen runs at a base clock of 3.10 GHz and boosts to 4.30 GHz, whereas the Xeon operates at a much lower 2.10 GHz base and 2.90 GHz boost. The Ryzen's 35 W TDP is remarkable when compared to the Xeon's 135 W TDP — the AMD chip delivers superior performance while consuming significantly less power, a factor that has major implications for cooling requirements and operating costs in dense deployments.

The cache hierarchies reveal a different strategic approach. The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE features 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, with 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Xeon E5-4669 v3 also has 64 KB L1 per core, but its L2 is halved to 256 KB per core, while its L3 is substantially larger at 45 MB shared. This 45 MB L3 cache is a classic server-oriented design, aimed at keeping large working sets resident on-die. However, the benchmark data suggests that the Ryzen's smaller but faster cache hierarchy, combined with its clock speed advantage, is more effective in Cinebench's workload patterns. The Xeon's die size of 662 mm² dwarfs the Ryzen's 156 mm², and the Ryzen's 9,800 million transistors on a 7 nm process highlight the density advantage of modern manufacturing. The Xeon's transistor count is not listed in the data, but its massive die size on 22 nm implies a much less efficient design.

The Verdict

The data paints a clear picture: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE wins every benchmark test against the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3, with margins between 5.9% and 6.2%. For workloads that rely on Cinebench-style rendering tasks, the Ryzen is the superior choice, despite having fewer cores. The Ryzen's 8 cores and 16 threads are enough to outperform the Xeon's 18 cores and 36 threads, which indicates that per-core performance is far more critical than raw core counts in these tests. The Xeon's only saving grace is its quad-channel memory interface, which provides 68.3 GB/s of bandwidth versus the Ryzen's dual-channel 51.2 GB/s — a 33% advantage that could matter in memory-bandwidth-sensitive applications not represented in these benchmarks. However, for the tested workloads, the Ryzen's higher clock speeds and modern architecture prove decisive.

The production status of these chips further tilts the balance. The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE is listed as active, while the Xeon E5-4669 v3 is end-of-life. This means the AMD part is still available for new designs, whereas the Intel chip is legacy hardware. The Xeon does have one advantage in the data: its launch MSRP of $7007, which positions it as a high-end server part. The Ryzen's launch MSRP is not listed, but its 58th percentile ranking alongside the Xeon suggests it delivers comparable or better performance at a presumably lower price point. For anyone building a new system today, the benchmark data strongly favors the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in multi-core Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE wins with a score of 15,699, beating the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3's 14,815 by 6%.

Q: How does the core count compare between the two?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 has 18 cores and 36 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the AMD chip wins all benchmark tests.

Q: What is the TDP difference between these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE has a 35 W TDP, while the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 has a 135 W TDP. The AMD chip delivers better performance with a significantly lower power envelope.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE and the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 support ECC memory.

Q: What is the release date difference?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 was released on 2015-05-31, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE was released on 2020-07-20. The Xeon is end-of-life, while the Ryzen is still active.

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core Cinebench R20 score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE scores 930 in Cinebench R20 single-core, compared to the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3's 878, a 5.9% advantage for AMD.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE wins in every benchmark category represented in the data. It leads in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 across both single-core and multi-core tests. The consistency of the 6% margin across all six tests suggests that the Ryzen's architectural advantages — higher clock speeds, modern Zen 2 design, and 7 nm process — provide a uniform performance uplift across different workload types. The Ryzen also wins on efficiency, with a 35 W TDP versus the Xeon's 135 W, and its integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics provide a display output capability that the Xeon lacks entirely. The Ryzen's active production status and newer release date (2020-07-20 vs 2015-05-31) make it the more future-proof choice.

The Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 does have specific advantages, though they are not reflected in the benchmark scores. Its quad-channel memory interface provides 68.3 GB/s of bandwidth, compared to the Ryzen's dual-channel 51.2 GB/s — a 33% advantage that could benefit memory-intensive workloads like large database operations or high-performance computing tasks that are not covered by Cinebench. The Xeon also offers 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes (CPU only), versus the Ryzen's 16 lanes, which allows for more expansion cards, GPUs, or NVMe drives in a single system. The Xeon's 45 MB shared L3 cache is substantially larger than the Ryzen's 8 MB, which could help with certain server workloads that exhibit high cache locality. The Xeon's 18 cores and 36 threads provide more raw parallelism for workloads that scale perfectly across cores, even if Cinebench does not show this advantage.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification category. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE uses the AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 uses Intel Socket 2011-3. The Ryzen is built on Zen 2 architecture with the Renoir codename, while the Xeon uses Haswell architecture with the Haswell-EP codename. The process nodes are generations apart: 7 nm for AMD (TSMC) versus 22 nm for Intel. The Ryzen's die size is 156 mm² with 9,800 million transistors, while the Xeon's die is 662 mm² with its transistor count not listed. Clock speeds differ significantly: the Ryzen runs at 3.10 GHz base and 4.30 GHz boost, while the Xeon runs at 2.10 GHz base and 2.90 GHz boost. TDP is a major differentiator: 35 W for the Ryzen versus 135 W for the Xeon.

Cache configurations are also divergent. Both have 64 KB L1 per core, but the Ryzen has 512 KB L2 per core versus the Xeon's 256 KB per core. L3 cache is 8 MB for the Ryzen versus 45 MB shared for the Xeon. Memory support is DDR4 for both, but the Ryzen uses dual-channel with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, while the Xeon uses quad-channel with 68.3 GB/s. PCIe lanes differ: the Ryzen offers Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Xeon offers Gen 3 with 40 lanes (CPU only). The Ryzen includes integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics, while the Xeon has no integrated graphics. The market segments differ — the Ryzen is a desktop part, while the Xeon is a server/workstation part. Production status is active for AMD and end-of-life for Intel. The release dates are 2020-07-20 for the Ryzen and 2015-05-31 for the Xeon. The Xeon's launch MSRP is $7007, while the Ryzen's is not listed. Both have locked multipliers, and both support ECC memory.