AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Intel Xeon E-2288G Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE and Intel Xeon E-2288G are both 8-core, 16-thread processors aimed at professional desktops and workstations, but they represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The data shows a near-total split: the AMD part wins every Cinebench test, while the Intel part wins both Geekbench tests. With the AMD chip holding a narrow 0.9% lead in average benchmark score (4411 vs 4373), the choice is not about raw aggregate performance but about which workload profile you prioritize. The verdict from the numbers is clear: pick the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE for heavily threaded, sustained rendering tasks where its Cinebench dominance and far lower power draw matter, and pick the Intel Xeon E-2288G for mixed or short-burst workloads that favor Geekbench's scoring model, particularly if you need a launch MSRP of $539.

The Verdict

Based strictly on benchmark results, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE is the stronger overall performer, winning 6 of the 8 head-to-head comparisons. Its Cinebench victories are consistent and decisive, ranging from 5.9% to 6.2% across R15, R20, and R23 in both single-core and multi-core tests. This makes it the pick for users whose primary applications scale with Cinebench-style rendering, such as 3D modeling, video encoding, and scientific computation. The Intel Xeon E-2288G, however, posts a commanding 15.8% win in Geekbench multi-core (7639 vs 6430) and a marginal 1.2% win in single-core (1632 vs 1612), suggesting it retains an edge in workloads that Geekbench models well, often including more latency-sensitive or irregular parallel tasks. For a general-purpose workstation, the AMD chip's 58th percentile ranking matches the Xeon's, but its higher average score (4411 vs 4373) and superior Cinebench results make it the default recommendation, especially given its 35W TDP versus the Xeon's 95W.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different manufacturing generations and design targets. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE uses a 7 nm process at TSMC, packing 9,800 million transistors into a 156 mm² die. It is built on the Zen 2 architecture with the Renoir codename, part of the Ryzen 7 4000 series. The Intel Xeon E-2288G uses a 14 nm process at Intel, with a 180 mm² die and the Coffee Lake-S WS codename, part of the Xeon E-2200 series. This process gap explains much of the power difference: the AMD chip has a 35W TDP, while the Intel chip draws 95W, a 60W gap that is critical for thermally constrained systems.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The AMD chip offers 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, but only 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip matches the L1 at 64 KB per core but halves L2 to 256 KB per core, while quadrupling L3 to 16 MB shared. This larger Intel cache can benefit workloads with high data reuse, but the benchmark data shows it does not overcome AMD's architectural efficiency. Both support dual-channel DDR4 memory and ECC, but AMD lists a higher memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s versus Intel's 42.7 GB/s. Both use PCIe Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ: AMD includes Radeon Vega 8, while Intel ships HD Graphics P630. The AMD part is listed as Active production with a release date of 2020-07-20; the Intel part is End-of-life with a release date of 2019-05-28 and a launch MSRP of $539.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results are a clean sweep for AMD. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE scores 1582 versus 1493 for the Xeon, a 6% advantage. Single-core R15 shows 223 versus 210, a 6.2% edge. The pattern repeats in R20, where AMD leads multi-core by 5.9% (6593 vs 6223) and single-core by 5.9% (930 vs 878). In R23, AMD wins multi-core by 6% (15699 vs 14817) and single-core by 6% (2216 vs 2091). These are not marginal differences; they represent a consistent architectural advantage across three generations of the Cinebench test.

Geekbench tells a different story. The Intel Xeon E-2288G wins multi-core by a massive 15.8%, scoring 7639 versus AMD's 6430. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison, suggesting that the Xeon's 16 MB of shared L3 cache and higher clock speeds (5.00 GHz boost versus 4.30 GHz) pay off in Geekbench's mixed integer and floating-point workload. The single-core Geekbench result is closer, with Intel winning 1632 versus 1612, a 1.2% margin. The data shows that the two chips are not simply "better" or "worse" — they excel in different benchmark families, and the Cinebench results skew toward sustained multi-threaded rendering while Geekbench emphasizes a broader mix of tasks.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE has an average benchmark score of 4411, which is 0.9% higher than the Intel Xeon E-2288G's average of 4373.

Q: How large is the Cinebench R23 multi-core gap?

A: The AMD chip scores 15699 in Cinebench R23 multi-core versus 14817 for the Intel chip, giving AMD a 6% lead.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon E-2288G win any benchmark tests?

A: Yes, it wins both Geekbench tests: multi-core by 15.8% (7639 vs 6430) and single-core by 1.2% (1632 vs 1612).

Q: What are the TDP differences between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE has a 35W TDP, while the Intel Xeon E-2288G has a 95W TDP.

Q: Are both processors still in production?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE is listed as Active production, while the Intel Xeon E-2288G is marked as End-of-life.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Xeon E-2288G?

A: The launch MSRP is $539.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE is the clear winner in Cinebench-based workloads, which typically correlate with content creation, 3D rendering, and video processing. Its six benchmark wins include all Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 tests, with margins consistently around 6%. The data suggests it is the better choice for users running long, multi-threaded render jobs where its 35W TDP also means less heat and lower cooling requirements. The AMD chip's higher memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s vs 42.7 GB/s) further supports data-intensive tasks. Its 8 MB L3 cache is smaller, but the benchmark results show this does not hurt it in rendering workloads.

The Intel Xeon E-2288G wins in Geekbench, particularly in multi-core where its 15.8% advantage is substantial. This suggests it may be preferable for workstation applications that resemble Geekbench's test suite, which includes compression, encryption, and physics simulations — tasks that can benefit from the larger 16 MB shared L3 cache and higher 5.00 GHz boost clock. The 1.2% single-core Geekbench win also indicates slightly better responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks. However, the Xeon's 95W TDP and End-of-life status are drawbacks, and its launch MSRP of $539 provides a reference point for cost. For users who must prioritize Geekbench-style performance or require the specific platform features of Intel Socket 1151, the Xeon remains viable; for all other purposes, the AMD chip's benchmark dominance makes it the data-backed choice.