AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G vs Intel Xeon W-1290E Comparison

The data presents a clear and consistent picture: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms the Intel Xeon W-1290E in every single benchmark recorded, despite having fewer cores and threads. This is a notable inversion of expectations, as the Intel part is a higher-TDP, workstation-class Xeon with a larger core count. The benchmark results show a uniform margin of victory for the AMD chip, with a 4.2% advantage across the entire Cinebench suite, and a slightly larger 4.3% edge in the single-core R15 test. This consistent deltaPct suggests that the architectural efficiency of the Zen 2 design provides a per-core performance advantage that more than compensates for the Intel's two additional cores.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results are the primary battleground, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G wins all six head-to-head matchups. In the multi-core tests, the AMD part scores 1734 versus 1664 for the Intel Xeon W-1290E in R15, a 4.2% lead. This pattern repeats in R20, where the Ryzen scores 7225 against the Xeon's 6934, and in R23, with scores of 17204 and 16510 respectively. The consistency of the 4.2% deltaPct across these three different generations of the Cinebench test indicates that the relative performance gap is stable regardless of the workload's scaling properties.

The single-core results tell a similar story, with the AMD processor holding a slight but consistent edge. In R15 single-core, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G scores 244 versus 234 for the Xeon, a 4.3% difference. The R20 single-core test shows the AMD part at 1019 against the Intel's 978, again a 4.2% delta. The R23 single-core results are 2428 for the AMD and 2330 for the Intel, maintaining the same 4.2% margin. This consistent single-threaded advantage is arguably more significant than the multi-core win, as it indicates that the Zen 2 architecture is more efficient at processing instructions per clock, a fundamental strength that benefits all workloads, including lightly-threaded applications.

The Geekbench results, which are only available for the AMD part, show a score of 7547 in multi-core and 1628 in single-core. While these scores are not directly comparable to the Intel's absent Geekbench data, they provide context for the AMD's overall performance profile. The average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is 4879, placing it in the 59th percentile of all CPUs. In contrast, the Intel Xeon W-1290E has an average score of 4775, also in the 59th percentile. This near-identical percentile ranking, despite the AMD winning every head-to-head test, highlights how close these two processors are in the grand scheme of the broader CPU market.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is the superior processor. It wins every single benchmark test in the head-to-head comparison, achieving a 4.2% to 4.3% lead in all six Cinebench scenarios. The data leaves no room for ambiguity: for pure CPU compute performance, the AMD chip is the clear winner. This is a surprising result given the Xeon's higher core count, higher TDP, and workstation-market positioning, which typically suggests a performance advantage in multi-threaded tasks.

The Intel Xeon W-1290E does not win a single benchmark in this comparison. While its 10 cores and 20 threads offer a theoretical advantage in heavily parallel workloads, the benchmark results show that the AMD's 8 cores and 16 threads deliver more actual performance. The data suggests that the AMD's superior instructions-per-clock (IPC) and more efficient memory architecture outweigh the Intel's raw core count. The average benchmark scores also favor the AMD, with 4879 versus 4775 for the Intel, a difference of approximately 2.2%. The Xeon's only saving grace is its launch MSRP of $552, a figure which is not analyzed here for value, but simply stated as a fact.

The percentiles for both chips are identical at 59, indicating that they occupy the same performance tier in the overall CPU landscape. However, the head-to-head data shows that within this tier, the AMD consistently outpaces the Intel. Therefore, for any user prioritizing raw compute performance as measured by these benchmarks, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is the definitive choice. The data does not support the selection of the Intel part for any performance-based reason.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G wins across the board in pure compute benchmarks. Its victories in all Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 tests, both single-core and multi-core, establish it as the superior choice for rendering, video encoding, and any workload that relies heavily on CPU processing. The consistent 4.2% lead in multi-core tests, despite the Intel having two more cores, suggests that the AMD's architecture is more effective at utilizing its available resources. This makes it the stronger candidate for tasks like software compilation, 3D rendering, and complex simulations.

The Intel Xeon W-1290E, while losing every benchmark, does not have a clear "win" category in this data. Its primary advantage is its core count, which is not reflected in the provided benchmark scores. However, the Xeon's market segment is listed as "Server/Workstation," and it features Intel UHD Graphics P630, while the AMD has Radeon Vega 8. For tasks that are not purely CPU-bound, the Intel's integrated graphics solution might be preferable in a workstation environment, although this is not a performance metric present in the data. The Xeon also has a larger 20 MB L3 cache compared to the AMD's 8 MB, which could theoretically benefit certain database or data analytics workloads, but this does not translate to a win in the tested benchmarks.

For a user with a specific workload that is highly sensitive to cache size, the Xeon's 20 MB of L3 cache might offer an unmeasured advantage. However, based on the data available, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is the winner in every measurable benchmark. The Intel Xeon W-1290E's only "win" is in the absence of a benchmark loss, but the data clearly shows that the AMD part is faster in all recorded scenarios. The Xeon would only be chosen for its specific platform features, such as the Intel Socket 1200 and its workstation market segment, rather than its benchmark performance.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is faster in all multi-core benchmarks. It scores 1734 versus 1664 in Cinebench R15, 7225 versus 6934 in R20, and 17204 versus 16510 in R23, each a 4.2% lead over the Intel Xeon W-1290E.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon W-1290E win any benchmark?

A: No. The head-to-head data shows the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G winning all 6 recorded benchmark tests, with the Intel Xeon W-1290E recording 0 wins.

Q: What is the difference in average benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G has an average benchmark score of 4879, while the Intel Xeon W-1290E has an average score of 4775. This places the AMD part slightly ahead, with its nearest rival being the Intel Xeon Gold 5315Y at a -0.2% deltaPct.

Q: How do their single-core performances compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G leads in single-core tests as well. It scores 244 versus 234 in Cinebench R15, 1019 versus 978 in R20, and 2428 versus 2330 in R23, a consistent 4.2% to 4.3% advantage.

Q: What are the core counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Xeon W-1290E has 10 cores and 20 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the AMD processor wins all benchmarks.

Q: Are both processors in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G and the Intel Xeon W-1290E are in the 59th percentile of all CPUs, indicating they belong to the same overall performance tier.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses the Zen 2 architecture with the codename Renoir, fabricated by TSMC on a 7 nm process node. This is a significant advantage in manufacturing efficiency, as the smaller node allows for more transistors in a smaller space. The AMD chip contains 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die, a density that is characteristic of modern, efficient designs. This architectural efficiency is likely the primary reason it achieves higher benchmark scores despite its lower core count.

In contrast, the Intel Xeon W-1290E is based on the older Comet Lake architecture, also known as Comet Lake, fabricated by Intel on a 14 nm process. This process node is comparatively less dense, resulting in a larger 206 mm² die size. The Intel part does not have a listed transistor count, but the larger die on an older process suggests a less efficient design overall. This architectural gap is the most probable explanation for the Intel processor's lower performance, as it is unable to match the AMD's per-core throughput.

The cache hierarchies also differ significantly. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G features 8 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Xeon W-1290E has a much larger 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Both have 64 KB of L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache differs: the AMD has 512 KB per core, while the Intel has 256 KB per core. The larger L2 cache on the AMD part may compensate for its smaller L3 cache, providing faster access to frequently used data. The Intel's larger L3 cache, however, could be beneficial for workloads with large working sets, although this advantage does not appear in the benchmark results.

Specification Differences

The most obvious difference is the core and thread count: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Xeon W-1290E has 10 cores and 20 threads. The base clocks are nearly identical, with the AMD at 3.60 GHz and the Intel at 3.50 GHz. However, the Intel part has a higher boost clock at 4.80 GHz versus the AMD's 4.40 GHz, which does not translate into a benchmark win. The TDP is also different, with the AMD at 65 W and the Intel at 95 W, indicating the AMD is more power-efficient.

The memory support is similar, with both supporting DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration. However, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G has a higher theoretical memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, compared to the Intel's 46.9 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. The sockets differ, with the AMD using AMD Socket AM4 and the Intel using Intel Socket 1200. Both have PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are different: the AMD has Radeon Vega 8, while the Intel has Intel UHD Graphics P630.

The process node and die size are significant differences, as the AMD is on 7 nm with a 156 mm² die, while the Intel is on 14 nm with a 206 mm² die. The AMD also has a higher transistor count of 9,800 million, while the Intel's is not listed. The release dates differ, with the Intel launching on 2020-05-12 and the AMD on 2020-07-20. The Intel has a launch MSRP of $552, while the AMD has no listed launch MSRP. The Intel is marked for the Server/Workstation segment, while the AMD is for Desktop. Both have locked multipliers and are currently in Active production.