AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G vs Intel Xeon Gold 5315Y Comparison

The Intel Xeon Gold 5315Y and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G are both 8-core, 16-thread processors that land in the same performance tier, with average benchmark scores of 4887 and 4879 respectively—a difference of just 0.2%. The data shows the AMD part wins seven of eight head-to-head tests, but the Intel chip takes the most decisive victory in Geekbench multi-core. The Xeon is a server/workstation part on Intel Socket 4189 with eight-channel memory and 64 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the Ryzen is a desktop chip on AM4 with dual-channel memory, 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, and integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics. Pick the Xeon if you need platform-level I/O and memory bandwidth; pick the Ryzen for raw compute wins in most benchmarks, especially single-threaded workloads.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to a clear split based on workload and platform needs. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G wins seven of the eight head-to-head comparisons, including every Cinebench test. Its lead ranges from 0.8% in Cinebench R15 single-core to 1% in R20 multi-core and R23 multi-core. The Ryzen also dominates in Geekbench single-core, scoring 1628 against the Xeon’s 1422—a 12.7% advantage. For users running Cinebench-style render workloads or single-threaded applications, the Ryzen is the consistent winner.

The Intel Xeon Gold 5315Y’s sole head-to-head win is Geekbench multi-core, where it scores 8127 versus the Ryzen’s 7547, a 7.7% margin. That result, combined with the Xeon’s eight-channel memory bus and 64 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, makes it the choice for memory-bandwidth-sensitive and I/O-heavy server tasks. The Ryzen’s 65W TDP versus the Xeon’s 140W TDP also matters for dense deployments or builds where thermals are a constraint.

If you are building a desktop workstation and can use integrated graphics, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is the data-backed pick. If you need a server CPU with massive memory bandwidth and PCIe lane count, the Xeon Gold 5315Y justifies its position despite losing most compute tests.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different design philosophies. The Intel Xeon Gold 5315Y is built on Intel’s 10 nm process (Ice Lake-SP) and targets the server/workstation segment. It uses an 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 3.60 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is a Zen 2 part (Renoir) fabricated by TSMC on a 7 nm process, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The process node advantage (7 nm vs 10 nm) and higher clocks help explain the Ryzen’s single-core wins.

Cache configurations also differ significantly. The Xeon offers 1 MB of L2 per core and 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Ryzen has 512 KB of L2 per core and 8 MB of L3. The Xeon’s larger L3 and per-core L2 may contribute to its Geekbench multi-core win. The Ryzen counters with a much higher boost clock (4.40 GHz vs 3.60 GHz).

Platform features are where the gap widens. The Xeon supports eight-channel DDR4 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 187.7 GB/s, whereas the Ryzen uses dual-channel DDR4 at 51.2 GB/s. The Xeon provides 64 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only), while the Ryzen has 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes. Both support ECC memory. The Ryzen includes integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics; the Xeon has no integrated graphics. The Ryzen’s die size is 156 mm² with 9,800 million transistors, but the Xeon’s die size and transistor count are not provided.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results are close but consistently favor the AMD chip. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Ryzen scores 1734 against the Xeon’s 1716, a 1% margin. The single-core R15 test shows 244 versus 242, a 0.8% edge. Moving to R20, the Ryzen leads multi-core 7225 to 7151 (1%) and single-core 1019 to 1009 (1%). In R23, the Ryzen scores 17204 multi-core and 2428 single-core, versus the Xeon’s 17027 and 2403—again 1% leads. These are tight margins, but they are consistent across every Cinebench workload.

Geekbench tells a different story. The Xeon wins multi-core decisively, scoring 8127 against 7547, a 7.7% advantage. That is the largest delta in any test. However, the Ryzen wins Geekbench single-core by a wide margin: 1628 versus 1422, a 12.7% lead. The single-core Geekbench result is the biggest gap in either direction and highlights the Ryzen’s clock-speed advantage.

The head-to-head tally is 7 wins for the AMD part and 1 for the Intel part. The Xeon’s multi-core win in Geekbench suggests its memory subsystem and cache layout help in certain multi-threaded scenarios, even though Cinebench multi-core favors the Ryzen. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical—4887 for the Xeon and 4879 for the Ryzen—so the overall performance tier is the same, but the distribution of wins matters for specific applications.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G boosts to 4.40 GHz, while the Intel Xeon Gold 5315Y boosts to 3.60 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon Gold 5315Y and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G support ECC memory.

Q: Which chip has integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G includes Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics. The Intel Xeon Gold 5315Y has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The Xeon Gold 5315Y supports eight-channel memory with 187.7 GB/s bandwidth, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses dual-channel memory with 51.2 GB/s.

Q: Which CPU wins the most head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G wins 7 of 8 head-to-head benchmarks. The Intel Xeon Gold 5315Y wins only Geekbench multi-core.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Xeon Gold 5315Y has an average score of 4887, and the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G scores 4879, a difference of just 0.2%.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is the pick for most compute-bound tasks. It wins every Cinebench test (R15, R20, R23) in both multi-core and single-core, with leads of 0.8% to 1%. Its Geekbench single-core score of 1628 is 12.7% ahead of the Xeon, making it the better choice for lightly threaded applications, everyday desktop use, and any workload that scales with clock speed. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics also give it a functional advantage for systems without a discrete GPU, and its 65W TDP makes it far easier to cool in a compact desktop build.

The Intel Xeon Gold 5315Y wins in Geekbench multi-core by 7.7% (8127 vs 7547), which points to strengths in certain multi-threaded scenarios. More importantly, its platform features dominate: eight-channel memory with 187.7 GB/s bandwidth versus 51.2 GB/s, and 64 PCIe Gen 4 lanes versus 16 Gen 3 lanes. For server racks, virtualization hosts, or workloads that hammer memory bandwidth, the Xeon is the only reasonable choice. The 140W TDP is a trade-off, but the platform’s I/O capacity is unmatched by the Ryzen’s AM4 socket.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two processors differ, based on the data provided.

| Field | Intel Xeon Gold 5315Y | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |

|---|---|---|

| Series | null | 4000 series |

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 3.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.60 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 140 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 4189 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Ice Lake | Zen 2 |

| Codename | Ice Lake-SP | Renoir |

| Generation | Xeon Gold (Ice Lake-SP) | Ryzen 7 (Zen 2 (Renoir)) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | null | 9,800 million |

| Die Size | null | 156 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 8 MB |

| Memory Bus | Eight-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 187.7 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 64 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | null | Radeon Vega 8 |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2021-04-05 | 2020-07-20 |

| Part Number | null | 100-000000145100-100000145MPK |