AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G vs AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G are two 8-core, 16-thread desktop processors separated by two CPU generations but nearly identical in measured throughput. Both sit at the 59th percentile of all CPUs in the database, and their head-to-head benchmark results land within a fraction of a percent of each other across every recorded test. The interesting story here is not which one wins, but how two chips with different architectures, power envelopes, and platforms converge on the same performance.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data covers six Cinebench tests, and the margins in all of them are razor thin. The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G takes five of six, but never by more than two-tenths of a percent.

Starting with multi-core rendering, Cinebench R15 shows the 4750G at 1734 against 1730 for the V3C48, a delta of 0.2 percent. Cinebench R20 repeats the pattern almost exactly: 7225 versus 7212, again 0.2 percent apart. Cinebench R23 stretches the gap to 17204 versus 17172, still only 0.2 percent. These are effectively identical multi-core results for processors launched two years apart.

Single-core tells the same story. In R15 both chips score exactly 244, recorded as a tie in favor of the V3C48 by the database's sorting. In R20 the 4750G edges ahead 1019 to 1018, a margin of 0.1 percent. In R23 it leads 2428 to 2424, another 0.2 percent gap.

What makes this convergence notable is the power context. The 4750G achieves these numbers with a 65 W TDP and clocks reaching 4.40 GHz, while the V3C48 matches it at a 45 W TDP and a 3.80 GHz boost clock. The newer Zen 3+ architecture and 6 nm process clearly compensate for the lower clock ceilings and tighter power budget. Efficiency per watt strongly favors the embedded part, even though raw scores do not separate them.

The 4750G's database record also includes Geekbench results, 7547 multi-core and 1628 single-core, for which no comparable V3C48 entry exists, so no cross-chip comparison can be drawn there.

In the broader database context, the V3C48's average benchmark score of 4967 places it in a cluster with the Intel Core i5-12600HE (4980, a 0.3 percent gap), the AMD Ryzen 7 4700G (4949, 0.4 percent), the Intel Core i7-1375PRE (4985, 0.4 percent), and the Intel Xeon W-2150B (4992, 0.5 percent). The 4750G's average of 4879 sits near the Intel Xeon Gold 5315Y (4887, 0.2 percent), the Ryzen 7 4700GE (4836, 0.9 percent), the Ryzen 7 5800HS (4827, 1.1 percent), and the Intel Xeon W-1290 (4932, 1.1 percent). Both chips occupy the same competitive mid-tier band.

The Verdict

On performance alone, there is no meaningful winner. A 0.2 percent delta in rendering workloads is within run-to-run variance for this class of test. Anyone choosing between these two should decide on platform and power criteria, not benchmark scores.

The 4750G makes sense where its AM4 socket, DDR4 memory, and integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics fit an existing build or a desktop system that needs display output without a discrete GPU. Its higher 65 W TDP reflects a desktop-oriented design with higher clock ceilings.

The V3C48 is the pick where power efficiency, platform longevity, and I/O matter more. It delivers the same benchmark results at a 45 W TDP, doubles the L3 cache to 16 MB, moves to DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth against 51.2 GB/s for the 4750G's DDR4, and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes versus 16 Gen 3 lanes. The FP7 socket and ECC support on both parts mean stability-sensitive deployments are viable with either, but the V3C48's newer platform carries the feature advantage.

In short: identical performance, different design centers. The 4750G wins on clock headroom and integrated graphics. The V3C48 wins on efficiency, memory bandwidth, cache, and PCIe capability.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G, with a score of 17204 versus 17172 for the V3C48. The margin is 0.2 percent, effectively a tie.

Q: Does either CPU win a benchmark by a meaningful margin?

A: No. Across all six recorded head-to-head tests, the largest gap is 0.2 percent. The V3C48's only outright win is a 244 to 244 tie in Cinebench R15 single-core.

Q: Which chip is more power efficient?

A: The V3C48. It matches the 4750G's benchmark scores while operating at a 45 W TDP versus 65 W, and it does so with a maximum boost clock of 3.80 GHz against the 4750G's 4.40 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes. Both the V3C48 and the 4750G list ECC memory support in the database.

Q: Which has better memory bandwidth?

A: The V3C48. Its DDR5 platform provides 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth on a dual-channel bus, while the 4750G's DDR4 platform provides 51.2 GB/s.

Q: Does either CPU have integrated graphics?

A: The 4750G includes Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics. The V3C48's record lists no integrated graphics.

Specification Differences

The two chips share a manufacturer, core count, thread count, 64 KB per-core L1 cache, 512 KB per-core L2 cache, dual-channel memory bus, ECC support, locked multipliers, desktop market segment, and active production status. They differ on nearly every platform-level spec:

• Base clock: 3.30 GHz (V3C48) versus 3.60 GHz (4750G)
• Boost clock: 3.80 GHz versus 4.40 GHz
• TDP: 45 W versus 65 W
• Socket: FP7 versus AM4
• L3 cache: 16 MB shared versus 8 MB
• Memory: DDR5 versus DDR4
• Memory bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s versus 51.2 GB/s
• PCIe: Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes versus Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes
• Integrated graphics: none listed versus Radeon Vega 8
• Release date: September 2022 versus July 2020
• Average benchmark score: 4967 versus 4879

The die-level data also differs in completeness: the 4750G's record lists 9,800 million transistors and a 156 mm² die, while the V3C48's record carries no transistor count or die size.

Architecture Differences

These processors represent two successive design philosophies from AMD. The 4750G is a Renoir part built on the Zen 2 architecture at TSMC's 7 nm node, released in mid-2020. The V3C48 is a Rembrandt part built on Zen 3+ at 6 nm, released in late 2022. Both dies come from TSMC.

The architectural gap shows up most clearly in cache and efficiency. Zen 3+ doubles the shared L3 cache, 16 MB against Renoir's 8 MB, which benefits latency-sensitive and data-heavy workloads even though the recorded rendering scores are equal. The newer 6 nm process, combined with the Zen 3+ core design, explains how the V3C48 sustains the same throughput as the 4750G at a 45 W TDP with clock speeds roughly 0.6 GHz lower at boost.

Platform architecture diverges just as sharply. The V3C48's FP7 socket pairs with DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4 connectivity across 20 CPU lanes, positioning it for modern embedded and compact systems. The 4750G's AM4 socket anchors it to the long-lived DDR4 and PCIe Gen 3 desktop ecosystem, with the compensating benefit of Radeon Vega 8 graphics on-die. The V3C48's record lists no integrated GPU, implying reliance on discrete graphics.

The benchmark data ultimately shows architectural progress expressed as efficiency rather than peak performance: two years and one architecture generation apart, these chips produce statistically indistinguishable rendering results, but the newer design achieves them with less power, more cache, and twice the memory bandwidth.