AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Intel Xeon W-2170B Comparison

The Intel Xeon W-2170B and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 occupy different corners of the processor market, yet their benchmark scores place them in the same overall percentile tier. The database shows both parts at the 61st percentile when compared against all CPUs, indicating that despite their architectural and market differences, they deliver comparable aggregate performance. However, the head-to-head results reveal a consistent edge for the Intel part across every recorded workload, with the Xeon W-2170B winning all six benchmark comparisons. The average benchmark score for the Intel chip is 5985, against 5610 for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700, a difference of roughly 6.7 percent in favor of the older workstation processor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the recorded data is the uniformity of the Intel Xeon W-2170B's advantage. In the Cinebench R15 multicore test, the Xeon scores 2085 against the Ryzen's 1955, a 6.6 percent lead. The single-core R15 result follows the same trend, with the Xeon at 294 and the Ryzen at 275, a 6.9 percent margin. These are not isolated outliers; the R20 and R23 suites reinforce the same story. In R20 multicore, the Xeon posts 8691 versus 8146, a 6.7 percent gap, while the single-core R20 shows 1226 against 1149, also a 6.7 percent difference. The R23 tests complete the sweep: multicore scores of 20693 for the Xeon and 19397 for the Ryzen, and single-core scores of 2921 versus 2738, both reflecting that same 6.7 percent delta.

No benchmark in the head-to-head set favors the AMD part. The wins column for the Xeon W-2170B stands at six, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 records zero. This consistency suggests a fundamental performance advantage rather than workload-specific variability. The single-core results are particularly telling, as the Ryzen has a higher boost clock of 4.40 GHz compared to the Xeon's 4.30 GHz, yet the Xeon still manages a higher single-core score in every iteration of Cinebench. The Xeon's 14 cores and 28 threads also outmuscle the Ryzen's 8 cores and 16 threads in multicore workloads, though the per-core efficiency of the Zen 2 architecture helps narrow the gap to a modest margin.

When placed against their respective nearest rivals, both processors sit within a tight performance cluster. The Xeon W-2170B is 1.1 percent ahead of the Intel Core i9-9920X, which scores 5917, and 1.2 percent ahead of the AMD EPYC 7451 at 5915. It trails the AMD EPYC 7501 by 2.3 percent (6128) and the Intel Core i9-7940X by 2.6 percent (6147). The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700, meanwhile, is effectively tied with its nearest competitors, showing a 0.1 percent lead over the Intel Core i7-12700T (5606), a 0.2 percent lead over the Intel Atom x7433RE (5601), a 0.4 percent lead over the Intel Core i9-11900KB (5587), and a 0.9 percent lead over the Intel Celeron G6900 (5561). These delta values place the Ryzen in a slightly lower absolute performance band than the Xeon, reinforcing the head-to-head results.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multicore score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Xeon W-2170B scores 20693, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 scores 19397, giving the Intel part a 6.7 percent advantage in that test.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 win any of the recorded head-to-head benchmarks?

A: No. The database records six head-to-head benchmark comparisons, and the Intel Xeon W-2170B wins all six. The AMD part has zero wins in this matchup.

Q: How do the two processors compare in single-core performance?

A: The Intel Xeon W-2170B leads in all three single-core tests. In Cinebench R15, the scores are 294 versus 275. In R20, they are 1226 versus 1149. In R23, they are 2921 versus 2738, with each showing a 6.7 to 6.9 percent gap.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Xeon W-2170B has an average benchmark score of 5985, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has an average of 5610. Both sit at the 61st percentile when compared against all CPUs.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Xeon W-2170B's 4.30 GHz. Despite this, the Intel part still achieves higher single-core benchmark scores.

Q: Are the two processors in the same performance percentile overall?

A: Yes, both are recorded at the 61st percentile against all CPUs, though their raw average scores differ by about 6.7 percent in favor of the Intel Xeon W-2170B.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Xeon W-2170B is built on the Skylake-W architecture and uses a 14 nm process node manufactured by Intel. Its die size is 484 mm², a large physical footprint that accommodates 14 cores and 28 threads. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700, in contrast, uses the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Matisse, and is fabricated on a 7 nm node by TSMC. Its die size is just 74 mm², and it packs 8 cores and 16 threads into that much smaller area. The transistor count for the AMD part is listed at 3,800 million, while the Intel part does not have a recorded transistor figure.

Cache layouts differ substantially between the two. Both share a 64 KB L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache differs: the Intel Xeon provides 1 MB per core, while the Ryzen offers 512 KB per core. The L3 cache is also organized differently. The Xeon has 19.25 MB shared across the chip, while the Ryzen has 32 MB. This means the AMD part has a larger pool of shared cache, which can benefit certain workloads, though the Intel part's larger per-core L2 may help with others.

Memory architecture is another point of divergence. The Intel Xeon W-2170B supports quad-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 uses dual-channel DDR4 with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and does not support ECC memory. For PCIe, the Xeon offers Gen 3 with 48 lanes from the CPU, while the Ryzen provides Gen 4 with 24 lanes. The newer PCIe generation on the AMD side offers higher per-lane bandwidth, but the Intel part has twice the lane count.

The Intel Xeon W-2170B has a TDP of 140 watts, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is rated at 65 watts. This reflects the Xeon's higher core count and older process node. The Intel part is also marked as end-of-life, while the Ryzen is listed as active production. The Xeon's market segment is Server/Workstation, whereas the Ryzen is categorized as Desktop. The Ryzen has an unlocked multiplier, meaning overclocking is possible, while the Xeon is locked.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every measurable specification. The Intel Xeon W-2170B has 14 cores and 28 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 2.50 GHz for the Intel part and 3.60 GHz for the AMD part. Boost clocks are 4.30 GHz and 4.40 GHz, respectively. The TDP figures are 140 watts for the Xeon and 65 watts for the Ryzen.

Sockets are incompatible: the Xeon uses Intel Socket 2066, while the Ryzen uses AMD Socket AM4. The process node is 14 nm for Intel and 7 nm for AMD. The foundry is Intel for the Xeon and TSMC for the Ryzen. Die size is 484 mm² versus 74 mm². L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the Xeon and 512 KB per core on the Ryzen. L3 cache is 19.25 MB shared versus 32 MB. Memory bandwidth is 85.3 GB/s versus 51.2 GB/s. The memory bus is quad-channel versus dual-channel. ECC memory is supported on the Xeon but not on the Ryzen. PCIe generation is Gen 3 on the Xeon and Gen 4 on the Ryzen, with lane counts of 48 and 24, respectively.

The market segment differs: Server/Workstation for the Xeon, Desktop for the Ryzen. Production status is end-of-life for the Xeon and active for the Ryzen. The release date for the Xeon is 2017-12-20, while the Ryzen was released on 2019-09-29. The multiplier is locked on the Xeon and unlocked on the Ryzen. The part numbers are SR3W3 for the Intel and 100-000000073 for the AMD. Neither processor has an integrated GPU.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon W-2170B is the clear winner in every recorded benchmark, taking all six head-to-head comparisons. Its advantage spans both multicore and single-core workloads, with margins ranging from 6.6 percent to 6.9 percent. This makes it the stronger choice for raw compute throughput, particularly in applications that can utilize its 14 cores and 28 threads. The quad-channel memory support and higher memory bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s further enhance its suitability for memory-intensive workstation tasks. The ECC memory support also positions it for server and workstation environments where data integrity is critical. Its PCIe Gen 3 with 48 lanes provides extensive expansion capability, which is valuable for systems with multiple accelerators or storage controllers.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700, despite losing all head-to-head tests, has its own strengths based on the recorded data. Its 7 nm process node and 74 mm² die size represent a significantly more efficient design, reflected in its 65 watt TDP. The higher boost clock of 4.40 GHz does not translate to benchmark wins, but the larger 32 MB L3 cache could benefit certain workloads that are cache-sensitive. The PCIe Gen 4 support offers newer connectivity standards, and the unlocked multiplier allows for user-controlled tuning. Its active production status and desktop market segment indicate it targets a different audience than the end-of-life Xeon.

For a user prioritizing maximum benchmark performance, the data points squarely to the Intel Xeon W-2170B. Its consistent 6.7 percent lead across Cinebench versions suggests it will handle both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads with a measurable edge. For a user prioritizing power efficiency, newer platform features, or overclocking flexibility, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 offers those attributes, but the benchmark record does not show a performance win in any tested scenario. The Xeon's higher TDP of 140 watts is the trade-off for its additional cores and threads, while the Ryzen's 65 watt rating makes it a more power-conscious option. Ultimately, the database shows a clear performance hierarchy: the Xeon W-2170B leads, and the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 follows within a narrow margin.