AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Intel Core i7-12700T Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Intel Core i7-12700T are closely matched processors, with the AMD part holding a slim aggregate lead. The average benchmark score for the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is 5610, while the Intel Core i7-12700T scores 5606, a difference of only 0.1%. Both processors sit at the 61st percentile of all CPUs, indicating they belong to the same performance tier within the database's results. The head-to-head comparison shows a clean sweep for the AMD processor across all six Cinebench tests, yet the margins are consistently narrow, suggesting the overall experience will depend heavily on specific workloads and system configuration.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a uniform picture: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 wins every single Cinebench test included in the head-to-head comparison. The most significant victory comes in the Cinebench R23 multicore test, where the AMD processor scores 19397 against the Intel's 18012, a margin of 7.7%. This is the largest absolute gap between the two, and it demonstrates that the AMD's 8-core, 16-thread configuration holds a distinct advantage in heavily threaded rendering workloads when compared to the Intel's hybrid 12-core, 20-thread design.

The single-core results tell a slightly different story, though the winner remains the same. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the AMD scores 275 versus the Intel's 256, a 7.4% lead. This pattern repeats in R20 single-core, where the AMD's 1149 score beats the Intel's 1067 by 7.7%. The consistency of this 7.7% delta across R20 and R23, in both single and multi-core tests, is notable. It suggests that the AMD processor's higher base clock of 3.60 GHz, compared to the Intel's 1400.00 MHz base clock, plays a significant role in maintaining this edge, even when the Intel's boost clock of 4.70 GHz is higher than the AMD's 4.40 GHz.

Looking at the Cinebench R15 multicore test, the AMD scores 1955 against the Intel's 1815, a 7.7% difference. The R20 multicore test shows a similar outcome, with the AMD at 8146 and the Intel at 7565, again a 7.7% delta. These results are interesting because the Intel Core i7-12700T has more physical cores (12 vs 8) and more threads (20 vs 16), yet it consistently trails. This is a clear example of where raw core count does not translate into superior performance, as the Zen 2 architecture of the AMD chip appears to scale more efficiently in these specific benchmarks.

The data shows that the Intel Core i7-12700T does not secure a win in any of the six head-to-head tests. Its closest performance is in the Cinebench R15 single-core test, where the 256 score is only 7.4% behind the AMD's 275. While the Intel part has a higher boost clock and integrated graphics, those factors do not manifest as a benchmark advantage in this comparison set. The overall average benchmark score of 5606 for the Intel is nearly identical to the AMD's 5610, which underscores how close these two parts are in overall capability despite the Intel's losses in these specific tests.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has a slightly higher average benchmark score of 5610, compared to the Intel Core i7-12700T's 5606. The delta between them is only 0.1%, making them statistically equivalent in overall performance.

Q: How much faster is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 in the Cinebench R23 multicore test?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 scores 19397 in the Cinebench R23 multicore test, while the Intel Core i7-12700T scores 18012. This gives the AMD processor a 7.7% performance advantage in this specific benchmark.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-12700T win any of the head-to-head Cinebench tests?

A: No. The benchmark data shows that the Intel Core i7-12700T loses all six head-to-head Cinebench tests to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700. The AMD processor wins every test, including both single-core and multi-core variants.

Q: What is the difference in their percentile rankings?

A: There is no difference. Both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and the Intel Core i7-12700T are placed at the 61st percentile when compared against all CPUs in the database.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700T has a higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Despite this, the AMD part wins all of the single-core Cinebench tests.

Q: What is the deltaPct between the two processors based on their average scores?

A: The deltaPct from the perspective of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is 0.1%, indicating it is slightly ahead. From the Intel Core i7-12700T's perspective, the deltaPct is -0.1%, indicating it is slightly behind.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is the clear winner in all measured rendering workloads. Its strongest showing is in the Cinebench R23 multicore test, where it outperforms the Intel by 7.7%, and it maintains a similar lead of 7.7% in the R20 multicore test. This makes it the preferred choice for users whose primary tasks involve CPU-intensive rendering, video encoding, or other workloads that scale well with multiple threads. The data indicates that the AMD processor's 8-core configuration, despite having fewer cores than the Intel, delivers superior performance in these specific scenarios.

The Intel Core i7-12700T does not have a single benchmark victory in this comparison. However, its value lies outside the tested metrics. It features integrated graphics in the form of UHD Graphics 770, which the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 lacks entirely. For a system without a discrete GPU, the Intel processor is the only functional option from this pair. Furthermore, the Intel part supports DDR5 memory in addition to DDR4, and it features PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, offering a more modern platform foundation for future upgrades.

The Intel Core i7-12700T also offers a lower thermal design power (TDP) of 35 watts, compared to the AMD's 65 watts. This makes the Intel processor a more efficient choice for low-power or small-form-factor builds where heat dissipation and power consumption are critical factors. The AMD processor, while consuming more power, does not translate that into a benchmark lead large enough to offset the Intel's efficiency and platform features.

Specification Differences

The most obvious specification difference is the core and thread count. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i7-12700T has 12 cores and 20 threads. The base clock speeds are also vastly different, with the AMD running at 3.60 GHz and the Intel at 1400.00 MHz. The boost clocks are closer, with the AMD at 4.40 GHz and the Intel at 4.70 GHz.

The processors use different sockets and memory standards. The AMD uses AMD Socket AM4 and supports only DDR4 memory, while the Intel uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bandwidth is listed for the AMD at 51.2 GB/s, but no figure is provided for the Intel. PCIe support also differs: the AMD has Gen 4 with 24 lanes, while the Intel has Gen 5 with 20 lanes.

The integrated graphics situation is a key differentiator. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has no integrated graphics, while the Intel Core i7-12700T includes UHD Graphics 770. The TDP ratings are 65 watts for the AMD and 35 watts for the Intel. The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the Intel processor does not. The Intel part has a listed launch MSRP of $339, while no MSRP is provided for the AMD.

Architecture Differences

The architectural foundations of these two CPUs are fundamentally different. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is based on the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Matisse, and is built on a 7 nm process node by TSMC. It has a die size of 74 mm² and contains 3,800 million transistors. The Intel Core i7-12700T is based on the Alder Lake architecture, specifically Alder Lake-S, and is built on a 10 nm process node by Intel. Its die size is significantly larger at 215 mm², and no transistor count is listed.

Cache layouts also differ substantially. The AMD processor features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and a 32 MB L3 cache. The Intel processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a 25 MB shared L3 cache. This means the AMD has a larger total L3 cache, while the Intel has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches.

The generation and series names reflect their respective lineages. The AMD is part of the Ryzen 7 series from the 3000 series, while the Intel is from the Core 12th Gen series. The AMD's codename is Matisse, and its generation is listed as Ryzen 7 (Zen 2 (Matisse)). The Intel's codename is Alder Lake-S, and its generation is Core i7 (Alder Lake-S). These differences in process node and cache hierarchy contribute to their distinct performance characteristics.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous regarding pure benchmark performance: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is the faster processor in all Cinebench tests, holding a consistent 7.7% lead in most metrics. Users who prioritize maximum multi-threaded rendering performance, as measured by these benchmarks, should select the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700. Its 61st percentile ranking and higher average score of 5610 indicate it holds a slight edge over the Intel part in this specific comparison.

The Intel Core i7-12700T, while trailing in every benchmark, offers features that the AMD cannot match. The inclusion of UHD Graphics 770 is a decisive factor for anyone building a system without a discrete graphics card. The support for DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 provides a more future-proof platform. The significantly lower TDP of 35 watts makes it an excellent choice for power-sensitive or compact builds where the AMD's 65-watt TDP might be a constraint.

Ultimately, the choice depends on the user's priorities. If the sole criterion is the Cinebench score, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is the winner. If the system requires integrated graphics, modern memory support, or lower power consumption, the Intel Core i7-12700T is the logical pick. The near-identical average scores of 5610 and 5606 suggest that in a broader range of tasks, neither processor will feel dramatically faster than the other, making platform features and specific workload requirements the deciding factors.