AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Intel Atom x7433RE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and Intel Atom x7433RE sit at opposite ends of the processor spectrum, yet their average benchmark scores are nearly identical. The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 averages 5610 points, while the Atom x7433RE averages 5601 points, a negligible 0.2% difference. This parity is deceptive, however, as the two chips achieve their scores through wildly different workloads, with the AMD part dominating traditional compute benchmarks and the Intel part relying on specialized tests to keep pace.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results paint a stark picture of raw performance disparity. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 scores 19397, obliterating the Atom x7433RE’s 3535 by a margin of 448.7%. This pattern repeats across every Cinebench iteration. The R20 multi-core test shows the AMD part scoring 8146 against the Atom’s 1484, a 448.9% lead. Even in single-core tests, where the Atom’s 3.40 GHz boost clock might offer some hope, the results are lopsided: R23 single-core sees the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 at 2738 versus the Atom’s 499, a 448.7% advantage. The R20 single-core test delivers a 449.8% win for AMD, with scores of 1149 and 209 respectively.

The oldest test in the suite, Cinebench R15 multi-core, continues the trend with the AMD chip scoring 1955 against the Atom’s 356, a 449.2% difference. Across all five head-to-head Cinebench comparisons, the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 wins every single test, and the Atom x7433RE does not register a single victory. The data shows that for any workload relying on sustained CPU throughput, the AMD processor is roughly five and a half times faster than the Intel Atom. This is not a close contest; it is a categorical difference in compute capability.

The average benchmark scores, however, tell a different story when looking at the full picture. The Atom x7433RE’s aggregate score of 5601 is propped up by its PassMark results, which are absent for the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700. In PassMark integer math, the Atom scores 13054, and in floating-point math it hits 8582. The data compression test yields 43671 for the Atom, while data encryption scores 3029. These specialized workloads allow the Atom to achieve an average score that nearly matches the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700, despite being utterly uncompetitive in Cinebench. This highlights a key insight: average scores can mask massive performance swings in specific applications.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is the undisputed winner in all traditional CPU benchmarks, including every Cinebench test for both single-core and multi-core performance. For users running rendering tasks, video encoding, or any heavily threaded application, the AMD chip is the only choice. Its 8 cores and 16 threads provide a massive parallel processing advantage, and the data confirms this with 449%+ leads across the board. The single-core wins also suggest that even lightly threaded applications, such as older games or basic office software, will feel snappier on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700.

The Atom x7433RE, by contrast, wins nowhere in the head-to-head Cinebench suite. Its strengths lie entirely in the PassMark subset, where it demonstrates capability in data compression, encryption, and extended instruction throughput. The PassMark multi-thread score of 4159 and single-thread score of 1568 indicate that while it trails the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 in absolute terms, it is not a completely incapable chip. The Atom’s 4 cores and 4 threads, combined with its 9W TDP, make it suitable for low-power embedded or fanless designs where sustained compute is secondary to energy efficiency. The benchmark data shows that the Atom is a specialist, not a generalist.

Users should choose the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 for any workload where processing time matters. The Atom x7433RE is only viable for scenarios where its low power draw and compact BGA 1264 socket are paramount, and even then, the performance gap is so large that it limits the Atom to lightweight tasks. The data provides no evidence of any workload where the Atom outpaces the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 in Cinebench, and its PassMark wins are relative to its own baseline, not against the AMD part.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is generational and philosophical. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 uses the Zen 2 architecture on a 7 nm process node manufactured by TSMC, with a die size of 74 mm² and 3,800 million transistors. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a substantial 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is limited to DDR4, running on a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The chip supports PCIe Gen 4 with 24 lanes from the CPU, and its unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking. It fits into the AMD Socket AM4 and carries a 65W TDP.

The Intel Atom x7433RE is built on the Amston Lake architecture, using Gracemont cores on a 10 nm process from Intel’s own foundry. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 3.40 GHz. Its cache configuration is distinct: 96 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of shared L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The Atom supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but only on a single-channel bus, delivering 38.4 GB/s of bandwidth. PCIe support is Gen 3 with 9 lanes, and the chip includes integrated UHD Graphics with 32 execution units. It is a mobile-market part, soldered to Intel BGA 1264, with a locked multiplier and a 9W TDP.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700’s dual-channel memory and 32 MB of L3 cache give it a significant advantage in memory-sensitive workloads, while the Atom’s single-channel bus and smaller cache limit its data throughput. The process node difference—7 nm versus 10 nm—explains why the AMD chip can offer double the cores and threads at a much higher clock speed. The Atom’s integrated graphics are a notable feature absent from the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700, but the performance implications are clear: the AMD part is designed for compute, the Intel part for power efficiency.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core Cinebench R23 score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 scores 2738, which is 448.7% higher than the Intel Atom x7433RE’s 499.

Q: What is the multi-core performance difference in Cinebench R20?

A: The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 scores 8146, while the Atom x7433RE scores 1484, giving the AMD chip a 448.9% lead.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has an average score of 5610, and the Atom x7433RE has 5601, a difference of only 0.2%.

Q: Does the Intel Atom support more memory types?

A: Yes, the Atom x7433RE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 supports only DDR4.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two chips?

A: The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has a 65W TDP, whereas the Atom x7433RE has a 9W TDP.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Atom x7433RE includes UHD Graphics 32EU, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has no integrated graphics listed.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is vastly superior to the Intel Atom x7433RE in every measured Cinebench performance category. With 449%+ advantages in both single-core and multi-core tests, the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is the only choice for any serious computing task. Its 8 cores, 16 threads, and 32 MB of L3 cache make it a capable desktop processor, and its unlocked multiplier adds flexibility for enthusiasts. The Atom x7433RE, despite a matching average benchmark score, achieves that figure through specialized PassMark tests that do not translate to general performance. Its 4 cores and 4 threads, combined with a 1.50 GHz base clock, cannot compete in rendering or compute-heavy applications.

The Atom x7433RE makes sense only for ultra-low-power, embedded, or fanless designs where the 9W TDP and compact BGA 1264 form factor are essential. Its launch MSRP is $63, which reflects its modest positioning. For anyone building a desktop or needing sustained multi-core throughput, the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 is the definitive winner. The benchmarks show no scenario where the Atom outperforms the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 in traditional CPU tests, and its PassMark strengths do not close the gap. Choose the AMD part for performance, and the Intel part only if power consumption is the absolute priority.