AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Comparison

The data presents a remarkably consistent picture: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 in every single benchmark recorded, with a uniform victory margin of roughly 10%. This head-to-head comparison is defined by the Threadripper’s consistent lead across all Cinebench versions, both single-core and multi-core workloads. The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700, while a newer design, does not manage to claim a single benchmark win in this dataset, making the 2920X the clear performance leader across the board.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking feature of this comparison is the uniformity of the results. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X wins all six head-to-head benchmarks, with the deltaPct hovering at exactly 10.2% or 10.3% in every test. This is not a case of one chip winning on multi-core while the other wins on single-core; the 2920X dominates both categories. For instance, in Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 2920X scores 21,380 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700’s 19,397, a 10.2% advantage. The single-core score in the same test is 3,018 versus 2,738, again a 10.2% lead for the Threadripper.

This pattern extends to older benchmark versions. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the 2920X posts 2,154 points, which is 10.2% higher than the 1,955 points from the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700. The single-core result in R15 shows the 2920X at 304 versus 275, a 10.5% difference, the largest margin in the entire set. Cinebench R20 follows the same trend, with the 2920X scoring 8,979 multi-core and 1,267 single-core, compared to the 3700’s 8,146 and 1,149, respectively. Both deltas are 10.2% and 10.3%. The data does not show any test where the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 closes the gap or wins outright.

When looking at the broader benchmark averages, the Threadripper 2920X holds an average score of 5,730 across all its recorded benchmarks, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 averages 5,610. This puts the 2920X slightly ahead in overall performance, though both chips share the same 61st percentile ranking among all CPUs. The nearest rivals for the 2920X include the AMD EPYC 7351, which is just 0.4% behind, and the Intel Xeon W-2175, which is 0.7% ahead. For the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700, its closest competitor is the Intel Core i7-12700T, which is only 0.1% behind, indicating that the 3700 is tightly grouped with other mid-range desktop parts.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X wins in every scenario tested. There are no categories where the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 takes a victory. The 2920X’s lead is consistent across all Cinebench workloads, which are standard measures of CPU rendering performance. This means that for any application relying on Cinebench-style multi-threaded rendering, the 2920X is the stronger choice. Its 12 cores and 24 threads provide a clear advantage over the 8 cores and 16 threads of the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 in these tests.

The single-core results are more surprising. Despite the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 having a higher boost clock of 4.40 GHz compared to the 2920X’s 4.30 GHz, the Threadripper still wins every single-core benchmark. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the 2920X scores 3,018 versus 2,738, a 10.2% win. This suggests that the older Zen+ architecture in the 2920X, despite its lower clock speed, delivers better single-threaded performance in these specific tests than the Zen 2 architecture in the 3700. The data does not support any use case where the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 would be the preferred choice based on performance alone.

Given that the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has zero wins in this dataset, the use-case split is one-sided. The Threadripper 2920X is the pick for any workload measured by these benchmarks. The only potential differentiators for the 3700 would be in areas not covered by the data, such as power consumption or platform features, but those are not reflected in the benchmark scores. The winsA count of 6 and winsB count of 0 clearly summarize the situation.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations and are built on different process nodes. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is based on the Zen+ architecture, codenamed Colfax, and is manufactured on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries. In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 uses the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Matisse, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. This node difference is significant, with the 7 nm process being more advanced, yet it does not translate into a performance win for the 3700 in this dataset.

The core configurations differ substantially. The 2920X features 12 cores and 24 threads, while the 3700 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Threadripper’s die size is listed as 2x 213 mm², with a total of 9,600 million transistors, whereas the 3700 has a single 74 mm² die with 3,800 million transistors. Cache layouts are similar in size but differ per core: the 2920X has 96 KB of L1 cache per core, while the 3700 has 64 KB per core. Both have 512 KB of L2 per core and 32 MB of L3 cache.

Platform support is another major difference. The 2920X uses the AMD Socket SP3r2 and supports quad-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 93.9 GB/s. The 3700 uses the AMD Socket AM4, supports dual-channel DDR4, and has a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. PCIe capabilities also diverge: the 2920X offers Gen 3 with 60 lanes (CPU only), while the 3700 provides Gen 4 with 24 lanes (CPU only). The 2920X has a TDP of 180 watts, compared to the 3700’s 65 watts. Both chips have unlocked multipliers, but the 2920X has a launch MSRP of $649, while the 3700 does not have a recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in multi-core Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X wins with a score of 21,380, which is 10.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700’s score of 19,397.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 win any benchmark?

A: No. The data shows the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has zero wins, while the Threadripper 2920X wins all six head-to-head benchmarks.

Q: What is the single-core performance difference in Cinebench R15?

A: The Threadripper 2920X scores 304 points, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 scores 275 points, giving the 2920X a 10.5% advantage.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Threadripper 2920X has an average benchmark score of 5,730, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 averages 5,610. Both chips rank in the 61st percentile among all CPUs.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each chip?

A: The Threadripper 2920X has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 has a higher boost clock of 4.40 GHz, compared to the Threadripper 2920X’s 4.30 GHz, but the 2920X still wins all single-core benchmarks.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is the superior performer in every benchmark recorded. It wins all six head-to-head tests, with margins of 10.2% or 10.3% in most cases and 10.5% in one single-core test. The 2920X’s higher core count of 12 versus 8 clearly helps in multi-core workloads, but its consistent single-core wins are notable given the 3700’s higher boost clock of 4.40 GHz. For anyone prioritizing raw Cinebench performance, the 2920X is the clear choice.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700, despite being a newer design on a 7 nm process with a lower 65-watt TDP, does not offer any performance advantage in this dataset. Its dual-channel memory support and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth are half the Threadripper’s quad-channel 93.9 GB/s, and this gap is reflected in the benchmark results. The 3700’s only potential appeal would be in lower-power or platform-specific scenarios, but those are not covered by the benchmark scores. Based solely on the facts, the Threadripper 2920X is the winner for any workload measured here.

Users should note that the 2920X requires the AMD Socket SP3r2 platform, while the 3700 uses the more common AM4 socket. The 2920X also has a launch MSRP of $649, whereas the 3700 has no listed launch MSRP. However, the performance data shows that the 2920X delivers a consistent 10% lead across the board, making it the recommended part for maximum benchmark performance.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 12 | 8 |

| Threads | 24 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.50 GHz | 3.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 180 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Architecture | Zen+ | Zen 2 |

| Codename | Colfax | Matisse |

| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |

| Transistors | 9,600 million | 3,800 million |

| Die Size | 2x 213 mm² | 74 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| Memory Bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 93.9 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 60 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 24 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Launch MSRP | $649 | None |

| Release Date | 2018-10-02 | 2019-09-29 |