AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 vs Intel Core i7-11700T Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-11700T boosts to 4.60 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 reaches 4.10 GHz. Intel holds a 0.50 GHz advantage in maximum turbo frequency.

Q: Do both chips have the same core and thread counts?

A: Yes. Both the Intel Core i7-11700T and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 feature 8 cores and 16 threads. The core topology is identical, but the underlying architecture differs.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i7-11700T does not support ECC memory, per the specification data.

Q: What is the difference in process node size?

A: The Intel Core i7-11700T is built on a 14 nm process, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses a 12 nm process. AMD’s smaller node is paired with a larger transistor count of 4,800 million versus Intel’s unspecified count.

Q: How do the two compare in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-11700T has an average benchmark score of 3864, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 scores 3777. Intel leads by 87 points, yet both chips sit at the 56th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: Only the Intel Core i7-11700T includes integrated graphics, specifically UHD Graphics 750. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 has no integrated graphics listed.

Where Each One Wins

The data splits cleanly along architectural lines. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 wins every single benchmark in the head-to-head comparison, taking all six tests. However, the margins are remarkably thin. In Cinebench R15 multicore, AMD leads with a score of 1316 against Intel’s 1304, a delta of -0.9% from Intel’s perspective. The single-core tests tell the same story: AMD’s 185 in R15 single-core edges Intel’s 184, again by -0.5%. This pattern repeats across R20 and R23, with AMD consistently ahead by 0.9% in both multicore and single-core tests.

The Intel Core i7-11700T does not win a single head-to-head benchmark. Yet its overall average benchmark score is higher. This apparent contradiction stems from the Geekbench tests. Intel scores 6621 in Geekbench multicore and 1824 in single-core, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 has no Geekbench scores listed in the fact pack. Those Intel Geekbench results pull its average up, even though AMD wins every test where both are measured.

For use-case selection, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is the safer pick for Cinebench workloads—rendering tasks that rely on R15, R20, and R23 will see a slight, consistent edge. The Intel chip’s advantage is in broader system benchmarks, where its Geekbench numbers indicate stronger performance in that specific test suite. If a workload relies solely on the six shared Cinebench tests, AMD wins. If the evaluation includes Geekbench, Intel’s average score of 3864 versus AMD’s 3777 suggests a better overall profile.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i7-11700T uses the Rocket Lake architecture, a 14 nm design from Intel’s own foundry. The die size is 276 mm². The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses the Zen architecture, specifically Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge), fabricated on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries. AMD’s die is 192 mm² and packs 4,800 million transistors, whereas Intel’s transistor count is not provided.

Cache layouts differ in L1 only. Both chips have 512 KB of L2 per core and 16 MB of shared L3. Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 per core, while AMD provides 96 KB per core. This 16 KB per-core difference in L1 is the only cache disparity; L2 and L3 are identical in size.

The memory support is DDR4 for both, with dual-channel buses. Intel specifies a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while AMD does not list a bandwidth figure. Intel supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU; AMD’s PCIe specification is not listed. Intel includes UHD Graphics 750, AMD has no integrated graphics. AMD supports ECC memory; Intel does not. The Intel chip is end-of-life, while the AMD part remains active in production.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-11700T | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |

|----------------|----------------------|----------------------|

| Base clock | 1400.00 MHz | 3.20 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.60 GHz | 4.10 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1200 | AMD Socket AM4 |

| Process node | 14 nm | 12 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | GlobalFoundries |

| Transistors | Not listed | 4,800 million |

| Die size | 276 mm² | 192 mm² |

| L1 cache (per core) | 80 KB | 96 KB |

| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC support | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Not listed |

| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 750 | None |

| Multiplier unlocked | No | Yes |

| Release date | 2021-03-15 | 2018-09-18 |

| Production status | End-of-life | Active |

| Launch MSRP | $323 | Not listed |

The base clock gap is substantial. Intel runs at 1400.00 MHz, while AMD starts at 3.20 GHz. Intel’s boost clock is higher at 4.60 GHz versus AMD’s 4.10 GHz, but the base frequency difference means AMD’s sustained performance at low load is far higher. TDP also diverges sharply: Intel draws only 35 W, AMD draws 65 W. The Intel chip is unlocked? No—the multiplier is locked. AMD’s multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are uniform: AMD wins all six tests. In Cinebench R15 multicore, AMD scores 1316 against Intel’s 1304, a deltaPct of -0.9% for Intel. The R15 single-core test is closer still: AMD 185, Intel 184, deltaPct -0.5%. That 1-point difference is the smallest margin in the entire comparison.

Cinebench R20 multicore gives AMD 5484 and Intel 5436, again -0.9%. The R20 single-core test shows AMD 774 versus Intel 767, a -0.9% delta. Moving to Cinebench R23, AMD maintains its edge: 13059 multicore against Intel’s 12945, and 1843 single-core against Intel’s 1827. Both R23 deltas sit at -0.9%. No benchmark swings more than 1% in AMD’s favor, and none favors Intel.

The Geekbench results are not part of the head-to-head table, but they appear in each chip’s benchmark list. Intel’s Geekbench multicore score is 6621 and single-core is 1824. AMD has no Geekbench entries. This omission is notable because Intel’s average benchmark score of 3864 exceeds AMD’s 3777, despite AMD winning every shared test. The average is calculated across all listed benchmarks, so Intel’s Geekbench numbers boost its average beyond what the Cinebench-only comparison suggests.

Interpreting the deltas: a -0.9% deltaPct in the head-to-head table means Intel trails by 0.9% relative to AMD’s score. The largest lead AMD achieves is 114 points in R23 multicore (13059 vs 12945). The smallest lead is 1 point in R15 single-core. Across all six Cinebench tests, AMD’s average advantage hovers just under 1%, which is within typical run-to-run variance for many systems. The data shows a consistent but narrow AMD edge in rendering workloads.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is the benchmark winner in every shared test. If the workload is Cinebench-based—rendering, 3D modeling, or CPU-bound creative tasks—AMD’s scores are higher across R15, R20, and R23, both multicore and single-core. The margins are small, never exceeding 1%, but they are uniform. No test shows Intel ahead. For users prioritizing raw Cinebench throughput, the data points to AMD.

The Intel Core i7-11700T offers compensating advantages outside the benchmark suite. Its TDP is 35 W versus AMD’s 65 W, making it a lower-power option for thermally constrained systems. Intel includes UHD Graphics 750, so a discrete GPU is unnecessary for basic display output. Intel’s memory bandwidth is specified at 51.2 GB/s, and it supports PCIe Gen 4, which AMD does not list. Intel’s boost clock is 4.60 GHz, higher than AMD’s 4.10 GHz, though its base clock is drastically lower at 1400.00 MHz.

The average benchmark score favors Intel: 3864 versus 3777. This is driven by Geekbench results that AMD does not have. If the evaluation includes Geekbench, Intel’s profile looks stronger. If the evaluation is strictly Cinebench, AMD wins all six tests.

The production status matters. Intel’s Core i7-11700T is end-of-life, while AMD’s Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 remains active. AMD’s chip has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, and supports ECC memory. Intel’s multiplier is locked. AMD’s process node is smaller (12 nm vs 14 nm) but its die is smaller (192 mm² vs 276 mm²) and transistor count is higher (4,800 million vs unspecified).

The choice depends on the workload and system requirements. For Cinebench rendering with a preference for lower power consumption, the AMD chip wins on performance but draws nearly double the power. For a compact or low-TDP build that still needs integrated graphics and PCIe Gen 4, Intel is the only option with those features. For ECC memory support or overclocking, AMD is the sole choice. The benchmark data gives AMD the performance crown in all shared tests, but Intel’s higher average score and feature set—integrated graphics, lower TDP, PCIe Gen 4—make it competitive for specific use cases. The percentile ranking is identical at 56 for both, indicating they sit at the same level relative to all CPUs. In a direct comparison, AMD wins the head-to-head, but Intel wins the aggregate score. The verdict is split: AMD for pure Cinebench performance, Intel for integrated graphics and lower power draw.