AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 vs Intel Core i3-13100E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data is unusually one-sided. Across every paired Cinebench test in the database, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 takes the win, and the margins are remarkably consistent. The lead hovers almost exactly at 11.5% in every single benchmark run, from the older R15 workload to the modern R23. That consistency suggests the gap comes from a fundamental architectural difference rather than a workload-specific advantage.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD scores 1316 against Intel’s 1180, a 11.5% difference. The single-core portion of R15 shows 185 versus 166, also 11.5%. Moving to R20, the AMD posts 5484 multi-core and 774 single-core, while the Intel manages 4918 and 694 respectively. Again, both deltas sit at 11.5%. The R23 results follow the same pattern: 13059 versus 11710 in multi-core, and 1843 versus 1653 in single-core, with the delta again at 11.5%.

It is worth remembering the Intel Core i3-13100E does appear in the database with additional Geekbench scores, but the head-to-head table only includes Cinebench tests. In those six paired tests, the AMD wins all six, and the Intel wins none. The average benchmark score for the AMD is 3777, while the Intel sits at 3668, a difference of roughly 3% in the aggregate.

The Intel’s single-core numbers are closer in absolute terms. The gap in R23 single-core is 190 points, which is a smaller percentage of the total score than the multi-core gap. But since the delta percentage is the same (11.5%), the relative advantage is identical. The AMD’s edge is proportional, not absolute, meaning it scales the same way whether the workload uses one core or all of them.

One detail that stands out: the Intel Core i3-13100E has a higher boost clock (4.40 GHz versus 4.10 GHz) and a higher base clock (3.30 versus 3.20), yet it loses every single-core test. That is a clear signal that the AMD’s older Zen architecture, despite running at lower clocks, delivers better instructions per clock in these Cinebench workloads. The data does not support any Intel win, even in tests traditionally favorable to higher-clocked parts.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is the faster processor in every Cinebench test recorded. It wins all six head-to-head matchups with an 11.5% margin each time. The Intel Core i3-13100E never leads in any paired test. If the decision rests purely on the recorded benchmark scores, the AMD is the clear choice for anyone prioritizing Cinebench performance.

However, the database also shows both processors sit at the 56th percentile among all CPUs. That means they are in the same performance tier overall, despite the AMD’s consistent win. The AMD’s average benchmark score is 3777 versus Intel’s 3668, so the aggregate gap is smaller than the Cinebench-specific gap. The Intel is not a weak processor; it is simply outmatched in this particular test suite.

The Intel’s nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X (delta -0.1%) and the Intel Xeon E5-2658A v3 (delta 0.3%). That places the Intel i3-13100E in the same performance neighborhood as a previous-generation 8-core AMD part. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-8086K (delta -0.6%) and the Intel Core i7-9700KF (delta -0.3%). So the AMD competes with older high-end Intel parts, while the Intel competes with older mid-range parts.

For a buyer choosing between these two specifically, the data says: pick the AMD if you want the higher Cinebench scores. The Intel offers no recorded benchmark advantage. The Intel does have a lower TDP (60 watts versus 65 watts), but that is a specification difference, not a performance result. The verdict from the measurements is simple: the AMD wins every recorded test.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 wins in all multi-core workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13059 versus 11710 represents the largest absolute gap in the dataset. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration gives it a structural advantage in heavily threaded tasks like video rendering, 3D modeling, and compilation workloads. The R15 and R20 multi-core results confirm this pattern, with the AMD leading by 136 and 566 points respectively.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 wins in all single-core workloads. This is the more surprising result. The Intel has higher clocks (4.40 GHz boost versus 4.10 GHz) and a newer architecture (Raptor Lake versus Zen), yet the AMD still leads by 11.5% in every single-core test. For lightly threaded applications like web browsing, office work, or older games that rely on one or two cores, the AMD is the faster part according to the data.

Intel Core i3-13100E has no recorded benchmark wins. The head-to-head table lists zero wins for the Intel. Its only potential advantages appear in specifications, not performance. It has a lower TDP (60 watts versus 65 watts), a newer process node (10 nm versus 12 nm), and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. But none of those translate into a benchmark victory in the recorded tests.

The Intel does have a Geekbench presence. The database lists Geekbench multi-core at 7025 and single-core at 2001 for the Intel, but no comparable Geekbench scores exist for the AMD in this dataset. Without a direct comparison, those numbers cannot be used to declare a winner. They only show the Intel’s absolute performance in that test.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 scores 13059 versus the Intel Core i3-13100E’s 11710, a 11.5% advantage for the AMD.

Q: Does the Intel win any benchmark in the head-to-head comparison?

A: No. The Intel has zero wins across all six Cinebench tests. The AMD wins all six.

Q: How much higher is the Intel’s boost clock?

A: The Intel boosts to 4.40 GHz, while the AMD boosts to 4.10 GHz. Despite this, the AMD wins all single-core tests by 11.5%.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD has an average benchmark score of 3777, and the Intel has an average of 3668. Both sit at the 56th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Does the Intel support more memory types?

A: Yes. The Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD supports only DDR4. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The AMD has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design generations. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses the Zen architecture, specifically the Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge) revision, built on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It packs 4,800 million transistors into a 192 mm² die. The Intel Core i3-13100E uses the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S), built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 163 mm². Intel’s transistor count is not listed in the database.

Cache layouts differ sharply. The AMD allocates 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 per core, a much larger 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The AMD’s larger L3 pool (16 MB versus 12 MB) may contribute to its consistent Cinebench lead, though the Intel’s larger per-core L2 helps compensate.

The AMD has no integrated graphics listed, while the Intel includes UHD Graphics 730. This means the Intel can run a display output without a discrete GPU, which is a practical feature for basic systems. The AMD requires a separate graphics card.

The AMD supports PCIe but the database does not specify a version or lane count. The Intel explicitly lists PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This gives the Intel a potential bandwidth advantage for storage or GPUs, though no benchmark data confirms a real-world impact.

Both processors support ECC memory, which is unusual for desktop parts and relevant for workstation use. The AMD uses AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD has an unlocked multiplier; the Intel does not. The AMD’s release date is September 2018, while the Intel’s is January 2023.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 | Intel Core i3-13100E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 4 |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Base clock | 3.20 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.10 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 60 W |

| Process node | 12 nm | 10 nm |

| L1 cache (per core) | 96 KB | 80 KB |

| L2 cache (per core) | 512 KB | 1.25 MB |

| L3 cache (shared) | 16 MB | 12 MB |

| Memory support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Integrated graphics | None | UHD Graphics 730 |

| PCIe | Not specified | Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only) |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $480 |

The core and thread count difference is the most obvious specification gap. The AMD has double the cores and threads of the Intel. That explains its multi-core wins. The Intel counters with higher clocks on both base and boost, plus a newer process node and a smaller die. The Intel also has a much larger L2 cache per core (1.25 MB versus 512 KB), which helps in latency-sensitive tasks.

The Intel’s support for DDR5 memory is a forward-looking feature, but the database lists no memory bandwidth figures for either processor, so no performance conclusion can be drawn. The Intel’s integrated GPU is a functional advantage, and its PCIe Gen 5 support offers modern connectivity. The AMD’s unlocked multiplier makes it more appealing for overclocking, though no overclocking results are recorded.

The launch MSRP for the Intel is listed as $480. The AMD has no launch MSRP in the database. Both processors remain in active production status. The Intel’s part number is SRMFR; the AMD’s is YD2700BBM88AF. The Intel’s release date is over four years later than the AMD’s, yet the AMD still wins every recorded benchmark. That is the most telling fact in this comparison.