AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X vs Intel Core i3-13100E Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X and Intel Core i3-13100E present a stark contrast in design philosophy, with the former relying on eight Zen cores and the latter on four high-frequency Raptor Lake cores. Benchmark results show a near-total split: the AMD part wins six of eight head-to-head tests, while the Intel part dominates the remaining two by wide margins. The average benchmark scores are effectively tied, with the AMD at 3673 and the Intel at 3668, a delta of just 0.1%, placing both at the 56th percentile among all CPUs. However, this average masks a deep divide in workload-specific performance, as the data reveals a clear trade-off between multi-threaded rendering and single-threaded responsiveness.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most lopsided results come from Geekbench, where the Intel Core i3-13100E decisively outperforms the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X. In Geekbench single-core, the Intel scores 2001 against the AMD’s 1076, a massive 46.2% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison and indicates a substantial per-thread performance gap. The multicore Geekbench result follows a similar pattern: the Intel scores 7025 versus the AMD’s 5355, giving the Intel a 23.8% lead. These wins are significant because Geekbench emphasizes memory latency and integer/fLoating-point efficiency, areas where the Intel’s newer architecture and higher boost clock of 4.40 GHz over the AMD’s 3.80 GHz provide a clear edge.

Conversely, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X wins every single Cinebench test, both single-core and multicore, across all three versions (R15, R20, R23). The margins are consistent and narrow, hovering around 13%. For instance, in Cinebench R23 multicore, the AMD scores 13227 against the Intel’s 11710, a 13% difference. The single-core results are similar: in Cinebench R20, the AMD scores 784 versus 694, again a 13% lead. The smallest margin is in Cinebench R23 single-core, where the AMD leads by 12.9% (1867 vs 1653). This consistency across Cinebench versions suggests that the AMD’s eight cores and sixteen threads provide a sustained throughput advantage in rendering workloads, even though the Intel’s four cores run at higher clocks.

The overall win count stands at 6-2 in favor of the AMD. However, the magnitude of the Intel’s Geekbench wins (23.8% and 46.2%) is far larger than the AMD’s Cinebench wins (all around 13%). This means the choice between these two CPUs depends heavily on the specific application. In pure rendering tasks, the AMD is ahead, but in tasks that favor short, single-threaded bursts, the Intel is the clear victor. The average benchmark score of 3673 for the AMD and 3668 for the Intel confirms this near-parity, with the deltaPct between them at just 0.1% in the AMD’s favor.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is the winner in all Cinebench workloads. This includes Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, in both single-core and multicore configurations. The data shows that the AMD’s advantage scales from roughly 12.9% to 13.3% across these tests. This pattern indicates that the AMD’s larger core count (8 vs 4) and thread count (16 vs 8) allow it to sustain higher throughput in long-duration, multi-threaded rendering tasks. Even in single-core Cinebench tests, the AMD wins, which is surprising given the Intel’s higher boost clock; the data suggests that the AMD’s per-core performance in this specific benchmark engine is superior, despite the clock speed disadvantage. This makes the AMD the better choice for video rendering, 3D model compilation, and any workload that uses the Cinebench engine or similar rendering algorithms.

The Intel Core i3-13100E is the winner in both Geekbench tests. The single-core victory is particularly dominant, with a 46.2% lead, while the multicore lead is 23.8%. These results indicate that the Intel’s architecture excels in tasks that rely on high clock speeds, low latency, and efficient branch prediction. This includes typical desktop responsiveness, many office applications, and software that is poorly optimized for multi-threading. The Intel’s higher boost clock of 4.40 GHz, compared to the AMD’s 3.80 GHz, is a clear factor in these wins. The Intel also has a lower TDP of 60 watts versus the AMD’s 95 watts, which may influence thermal behavior, though the benchmark data does not directly measure power consumption. The Intel’s integrated UHD Graphics 730 is another differentiator, as the AMD has no integrated graphics, meaning the Intel can be used in systems without a discrete GPU.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures and process nodes. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X uses the Zen architecture, codenamed Summit Ridge, manufactured on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It features 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz. The cache layout includes 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB of L3. The AMD supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s and includes ECC memory support. It uses the AMD Socket AM4 and provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. The die size is 213 mm² and it contains 4,800 million transistors. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking.

The Intel Core i3-13100E uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. It features 4 cores and 8 threads with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The cache layout is different: 80 KB of L1 per core, a larger 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB of L3. The Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, but the memory bandwidth is not listed in the data. It also supports ECC memory. The Intel uses the Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, a significant upgrade over the AMD’s Gen 3. The die size is 163 mm², which is smaller than the AMD’s. The Intel includes integrated UHD Graphics 730, which the AMD lacks. The Intel’s multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking.

These architectural differences explain the benchmark results. The AMD’s older 14 nm process and larger die size (213 mm²) suggest a less power-efficient design, but its 8-core layout provides raw multi-threaded muscle. The Intel’s newer 10 nm process and smaller die (163 mm²) allow for higher clock speeds and better single-thread performance, but the 4-core limit constrains its multi-threaded output. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the Intel is a future-proofing advantage, while the AMD’s unlocked multiplier offers flexibility for enthusiasts. The Intel’s support for DDR5 also gives it a memory bandwidth advantage in theory, though the data does not provide a bandwidth figure for the Intel.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is the superior choice for multi-threaded, render-heavy workloads, while the Intel Core i3-13100E is the better pick for single-threaded and latency-sensitive tasks. The AMD wins all six Cinebench tests, with a consistent 13% lead across the board, indicating a reliable advantage in 3D rendering and similar computational tasks. Its 8 cores and 16 threads provide a structure that the Intel’s 4 cores and 8 threads cannot match in sustained throughput. For users who prioritize Cinebench-style performance, the AMD is the clear winner.

The Intel Core i3-13100E, however, offers a massive 46.2% lead in Geekbench single-core and a 23.8% lead in Geekbench multicore. This makes it the superior choice for applications that depend on single-thread speed, such as older games, certain simulation software, and general desktop usage. The Intel also has a lower TDP (60W vs 95W) and includes integrated graphics, making it a more flexible and potentially more energy-efficient option for a basic desktop system. The launch MSRP for the Intel is $480, a figure that should be considered as a fixed launch price only.

For a workstation dedicated to rendering, the AMD is the data-backed choice. For a general-purpose or single-thread-focused system, the Intel is superior. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical, but the workloads are not. Users should select based on the specific applications they intend to run. The AMD’s unlocked multiplier is a point for overclockers, while the Intel’s PCIe Gen 5 support is a point for future expansion. There is no overall winner; there are only preferred use cases.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X has an average benchmark score of 3673, while the Intel Core i3-13100E scores 3668. The deltaPct between them is 0.1% in favor of the AMD, making them statistically tied.

Q: How much faster is the Intel in Geekbench single-core?

A: The Intel Core i3-13100E scores 2001 in Geekbench single-core, compared to the AMD’s 1076. This gives the Intel a 46.2% advantage, the largest margin in any test.

Q: Does the AMD win any tests besides Cinebench?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X wins all six Cinebench tests (R15, R20, R23 in both single and multi-core), but loses both Geekbench tests to the Intel.

Q: What is the difference in core and thread counts?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i3-13100E has 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD also has a larger shared L3 cache of 16 MB, versus 12 MB on the Intel.

Q: Does the Intel have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i3-13100E includes UHD Graphics 730. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU for display output.

Q: Which CPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i3-13100E has a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X’s boost clock of 3.80 GHz. This contributes to the Intel’s strong single-thread performance.