AMD Ryzen 7 9700X vs Intel Core 5 315 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data records 15 head-to-head comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and the Intel Core 5 315. The AMD processor wins all 15. The margin varies widely by workload. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD part scores 20,485 against 12,981, a 57.8% lead. The single-core result is closer: 2,211 versus 1,832, a 20.7% advantage. The older Cinebench R15 test shows an even larger multi-core gap of 143% (3,178 vs 1,308) and an 88% single-core edge (346 vs 184).

PassMark integer math produces the largest recorded delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 120,142, while the Intel Core 5 315 manages 31,690, a 279.1% difference. Data compression shows a 199.1% lead (437,140 vs 146,143). Extended instructions follow at 168.7% (35,318 vs 13,143). Random string sorting favors AMD by 166.5% (46,782 vs 17,551). The multithread test shows 143.3% (37,161 vs 15,272). Floating point math is 86.1% higher (78,999 vs 42,441). Physics records a 92.7% margin (2,241 vs 1,163). Prime number finding is 71.4% faster (192 vs 112). Data encryption shows 96.2% (21,815 vs 11,119).

The narrowest win is PassMark single-thread, where the AMD part scores 4,654 versus 4,021, a 15.7% margin. The same delta appears in the duplicated singlethread entry. No test in the head-to-head set favors the Intel processor. The average benchmark score reflects the overall distance: the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X averages 37,943, while the Intel Core 5 315 averages 18,188. The AMD chip also holds an 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, against the 72nd percentile for the Intel part.

Architecture Differences

The two processors belong to different market segments and manufacturing approaches. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is built on TSMC's 4 nm process node and uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Granite Ridge codename. It belongs to the 9000 series and is classified as a desktop part. The Intel Core 5 315 uses Intel's own 3 nm node with the Wildcat Lake codename, and the database places it in the mobile segment. The Intel part does not list a discrete architecture name, so the comparison relies on the recorded node, core configuration, and feature set.

Core counts differ substantially. The AMD processor has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel processor has 6 cores and 6 threads. The Intel part has no simultaneous multithreading in the recorded data. Base clocks also diverge: the AMD part runs at 3.80 GHz, the Intel part at 1.50 GHz. Boost clocks are 5.50 GHz for AMD and 4.40 GHz for Intel. The AMD chip has a 65 TDP, while the Intel chip has a 15 TDP, reflecting the mobile-class design of the latter.

Cache layouts are not directly comparable. The AMD processor lists 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3. The Intel processor lists 192 KB of L1, 2.5 MB of L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The memory interface differs as well. AMD supports DDR5 over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and it supports ECC memory. Intel supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s, with no ECC support. PCIe connectivity also differs: AMD provides Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, Intel provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes. The AMD part includes Radeon Graphics integrated, while the Intel part includes Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The AMD multiplier is unlocked; the Intel multiplier is locked. The AMD processor fits AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel processor uses Intel BGA 1516.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread performance in the recorded benchmarks?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X leads in every single-thread test. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 2,211 versus 1,832 for the Intel Core 5 315, a 20.7% margin. In PassMark single-thread, the gap is 15.7% with scores of 4,654 and 4,021.

Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap?

A: The AMD part wins Cinebench R23 multi-core by 57.8% (20,485 vs 12,981). In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the margin expands to 143% (3,178 vs 1,308). PassMark multithread shows 143.3% (37,161 vs 15,272).

Q: What is the most lopsided benchmark between the two?

A: PassMark integer math shows the largest recorded delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 120,142, and the Intel Core 5 315 scores 31,690, a 279.1% difference.

Q: Do the two processors use the same memory configuration?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X uses dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support. The Intel Core 5 315 uses single-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth and no ECC support.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 5 315 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The Intel processor does not record any multithreading capability.

Q: Which processor ranks higher in the overall database percentile?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 315 sits at the 72nd percentile. The average benchmark scores are 37,943 and 18,188 respectively.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split by workload class. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X dominates every recorded benchmark, with the smallest margin being 15.7% in single-thread tests. The largest margins appear in integer math and data compression, where the AMD part more than doubles or nearly triples the Intel scores. For any task that relies on multi-core throughput, the AMD processor is the stronger option by a wide margin. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a 5.50 GHz boost clock and dual-channel memory provides a structural advantage over the 6-core, 6-thread Intel part with a 4.40 GHz boost and single-channel memory.

The Intel Core 5 315 does hold a different position in the database: it is a mobile-class processor with a 15 TDP, a 3 nm Intel node, and support for LPDDR5X. Its benchmark profile aligns with that segment. The nearest rivals for the Intel part include the Intel Core i7-9700 and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, with average scores of 18,180 and 18,176 respectively. The Intel Core 5 315 sits at 18,188, essentially level with those parts. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X, by contrast, matches processors like the Intel Core i9-14901E and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, all averaging near 37,900.

The choice depends entirely on the target system. For a desktop build where performance per thread and multi-core throughput matter, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is the only option among the two that delivers competitive results. The Intel Core 5 315 belongs to a lower-power mobile context, and its benchmark results reflect that positioning. The database records no benchmark where the Intel part outperforms the AMD part, so there is no measured scenario in which the Intel processor takes the lead.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen 7 9700X | Intel Core 5 315 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 6 |

| Base clock | 3.80 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.50 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 65 | 15 |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Process node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 cache | 80 KB per core | 192 KB |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 2.5 MB |

| L3 cache | 32 MB shared | 6 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 24 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon Graphics | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Multiplier unlocked | Yes | No |

| Launch MSRP | $359 | $340 |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X wins in every recorded benchmark category. Its largest advantages appear in PassMark integer math (279.1%), data compression (199.1%), and extended instructions (168.7%). These results indicate a strong fit for CPU-bound compute tasks, content creation workloads that scale across threads, and any application that benefits from wide data paths. The dual-channel DDR5 memory bus and 32 MB of shared L3 cache support sustained multi-core loads. The unlocked multiplier also permits frequency tuning, though the database does not record overclocking results.

The Intel Core 5 315 does not win any benchmark in the head-to-head set. Its recorded strengths are relative to its own market segment, not against the AMD part. With a 15 TDP and a single-channel memory bus, it aligns with power-constrained mobile designs. The support for LPDDR5X makes it suitable for compact systems where power draw and board space are limited. The 3 nm Intel node and 6-lane Gen 4 PCIe interface also point toward a low-power mobile platform. For users selecting between these two specific processors, the data shows no workload where the Intel part takes the lead. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is the superior choice for desktop performance, while the Intel Core 5 315 remains a mobile-class processor whose benchmark profile does not challenge the AMD part in any measured test.