AMD Ryzen 7 9700F vs Intel Xeon 6724P Comparison

The Intel Xeon 6724P and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F are fundamentally different processors aimed at different markets, and the benchmark data reflects that divide clearly. Across the head-to-head tests, the Xeon 6724P claims 9 wins while the Ryzen 7 9700F takes 2, with the Intel part dominating heavily in multi-threaded and server-oriented workloads. However, the Ryzen 7 9700F posts a decisive victory in single-thread performance, making the choice between them a matter of workload priority rather than overall superiority.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Xeon 6724P wins the multi-threaded categories by substantial margins, often exceeding 40% deltas. In the PassMark multithread test, the Xeon scores 51,345 against the Ryzen’s 36,470, a 40.8% advantage. The gap widens further in specialized workloads; the Xeon’s 135,404 in floating point math is 73.7% ahead of the Ryzen’s 77,955. The most extreme difference appears in the physics test, where the Xeon’s 5,004 score crushes the Ryzen’s 2,122, a 135.8% delta. These results indicate the Xeon’s 16 cores and 32 threads provide a substantial throughput advantage over the Ryzen’s 8 cores and 16 threads.

The Xeon also leads in integer math with 172,216 versus 120,788 (42.6% higher), and in data compression with 627,185 versus 421,988 (48.6% higher). Encryption performance shows a 59.8% gap in favor of the Xeon (34,332 vs 21,488), while extended instructions see a 60.6% delta (54,101 vs 33,688). The Xeon’s advantage in random string sorting is 49.2% (68,477 vs 45,890), and it doubles the Ryzen’s score in prime number finding, 372 versus 183, a 103.3% increase. These are not marginal wins; the Xeon consistently delivers roughly 1.4x to 2x the performance of the Ryzen across these parallel workloads.

The one clear reversal is single-thread performance. The Ryzen 7 9700F scores 4,691 in the PassMark single-thread test, which is 30.1% higher than the Xeon’s 3,279. This is a significant margin, reflecting the Ryzen’s higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz versus the Xeon’s 4.30 GHz, and its newer Zen 5 architecture. While the Xeon dominates in raw throughput, the Ryzen is the clear winner for latency-sensitive or lightly threaded tasks.

Overall, the average benchmark score tells a similar story: the Xeon 6724P averages 72,396 across all tests, placing it 3.4% above the Ryzen’s 69,996. Both processors sit at the 94th percentile of all CPUs, meaning they are both high performers, but the Xeon’s edge in multi-core work gives it the higher aggregate score.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F wins the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 4,691, which is 30.1% higher than the Intel Xeon 6724P’s 3,279.

Q: How much faster is the Intel Xeon 6724P in multi-threaded workloads?

A: In the PassMark multithread test, the Xeon scores 51,345 compared to the Ryzen’s 36,470, a 40.8% advantage. The gap is even larger in physics (135.8%) and floating point math (73.7%).

Q: What is the difference in core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Xeon 6724P has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Xeon has exactly double the core and thread count.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F boosts to 5.50 GHz, while the Intel Xeon 6724P boosts to 4.30 GHz. The Ryzen’s boost clock is 1.20 GHz higher.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon 6724P and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F have ECC memory support listed in their specifications.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Xeon 6724P has an average benchmark score of 72,396, which is 3.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F’s 69,996.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon 6724P is the clear winner for any workload that scales across cores or threads. Its 16-core, 32-thread configuration, combined with a 72 MB shared L3 cache, delivers massive advantages in server-style tasks like data compression, encryption, and floating-point math. The benchmark results show it is 48.6% faster in data compression and 59.8% faster in encryption, making it the obvious choice for database workloads, virtualization hosts, or any application that processes large datasets in parallel. The physics test result, a 135.8% lead, suggests it excels in simulation and scientific computing scenarios.

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F wins where single-thread speed matters most. Its 30.1% lead in the PassMark single-thread test makes it the better pick for everyday desktop use, gaming, or applications that rely on high-frequency, low-latency execution. The 5.50 GHz boost clock and 4 nm TSMC process give it a per-core performance edge that the Xeon cannot match, despite the Xeon’s overall throughput advantage. For a user who prioritizes responsiveness in lightly threaded software, the Ryzen is the superior choice.

In terms of aggregate performance, the Xeon’s 9 wins out of 11 benchmarks show it is the dominant part for mixed workloads. However, the Ryzen’s 2 wins are in the most visible category for consumer use—single-thread performance—so the “winner” depends entirely on whether the user’s applications are parallel or serial in nature.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification category. The Intel Xeon 6724P has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are close, with the Xeon at 3.60 GHz and the Ryzen at 3.80 GHz, but the boost clocks diverge sharply: 4.30 GHz for the Xeon versus 5.50 GHz for the Ryzen. Thermal design power is a major differentiator, with the Xeon rated at 210 W and the Ryzen at 65 W.

The sockets are incompatible: the Xeon uses Intel Socket 4710, while the Ryzen uses AMD Socket AM5. Memory support differs in channel count, with the Xeon featuring eight-channel memory and the Ryzen dual-channel. Memory bandwidth reflects this, with the Xeon delivering 409.6 GB/s versus the Ryzen’s 89.6 GB/s. PCIe lanes also differ significantly: the Xeon offers 88 Gen 5 lanes, while the Ryzen provides 24 Gen 5 lanes. Both support DDR5 and ECC memory, but the Xeon’s server-class memory subsystem is far more expansive.

Cache configurations are also distinct. The Xeon has 112 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 72 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ryzen has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Xeon’s larger caches, particularly the 72 MB L3, contribute to its multi-threaded performance advantage. The Ryzen has an unlocked multiplier, while the Xeon does not, and the Ryzen’s launch MSRP is $289, while the Xeon’s launch MSRP is $3622.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Xeon 6724P is built on the Granite Rapids architecture, part of the Xeon 6 generation, manufactured on Intel’s 5 nm process. It uses a server/workstation design with a focus on memory bandwidth and core count. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F uses the Zen 5 architecture on the Granite Ridge codename, part of the Ryzen 7 9000 series, fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process. The process node difference is one nanometer, but the architectural philosophies are far apart.

The Xeon’s Granite Rapids-SP generation is designed for scale-up environments, evidenced by its eight-channel memory bus and 88 PCIe lanes. The Ryzen’s Granite Ridge is a desktop part with a dual-channel memory bus and 24 PCIe lanes, prioritizing cost and efficiency over raw expansion capability. The Xeon has no integrated graphics, and neither does the Ryzen, but the Xeon’s transistor count is not listed, while the Ryzen lists 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The Xeon’s die size is also not listed, but its 210 W TDP suggests a much larger physical package to house 16 cores and the massive L3 cache.

The cache hierarchy reflects the different design goals. The Xeon’s 72 MB shared L3 cache is more than double the Ryzen’s 32 MB, which helps feed its 32 threads in parallel workloads. The Ryzen’s smaller per-core L1 (80 KB vs 112 KB) and L2 (1 MB vs 2 MB) caches are optimized for lower latency rather than bandwidth. The Xeon also supports eight-channel memory, allowing a theoretical bandwidth of 409.6 GB/s, which is 4.6 times higher than the Ryzen’s 89.6 GB/s, further reinforcing its server positioning.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split: choose the Intel Xeon 6724P for multi-threaded, server-grade workloads, and choose the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F for single-thread performance and desktop efficiency. The Xeon dominates 9 of 11 benchmark categories, with leads ranging from 40.8% in multithread to 135.8% in physics. Its 16 cores, 32 threads, 72 MB L3 cache, and eight-channel memory make it the superior part for any task that can utilize parallel processing, from scientific computing to heavy data manipulation.

The Ryzen 7 9700F wins only in the single-thread tests, but it wins them decisively, with a 30.1% advantage. Its 5.50 GHz boost clock and Zen 5 architecture deliver per-core performance that the Xeon cannot approach. For a desktop user running typical applications, games, or productivity software that relies on a few fast cores, the Ryzen is the better fit. Its 65 W TDP also makes it far more energy-efficient than the Xeon’s 210 W rating, though the Xeon’s higher power draw is justified by its performance in its target market.

Both processors sit at the 94th percentile of all CPUs, so neither is a weak choice. The Xeon’s average benchmark score of 72,396 is 3.4% higher than the Ryzen’s 69,996, but that aggregate number masks the fundamental difference in their strengths. The Xeon is a server/workstation processor that happens to be in the same performance tier as a high-end desktop part; the Ryzen is a desktop processor that cannot match the Xeon’s throughput but excels at responsiveness. The verdict is straightforward: if the workload is parallel, take the Xeon; if it is serial, take the Ryzen.