AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Intel Core i5-13500HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear split between these two mobile processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS takes 15 of the 21 recorded head-to-head wins, while the Intel Core i5-13500HX counters with 6 wins, mostly in heavily threaded and specialized workloads.

Starting with the AMD side, the most decisive victory comes in PassMark extended instructions, where the 8845HS scores 25,642 against Intel's 20,200, a commanding 26.9% advantage. This indicates a substantial lead in workloads that leverage advanced instruction sets, such as AVX-512 or similar extensions. Random string sorting also heavily favors AMD, with a score of 41,446 versus 36,373, a 13.9% gap that suggests better memory access patterns and per-core efficiency in pointer-chasing tasks.

The single-threaded picture is consistently AMD. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the 8845HS scores 276 versus Intel's 252, a 9.5% lead. Cinebench R23 single-core shows a narrower 2.2% margin (1,769 vs 1,730.5). The 3DMark single-thread test also goes AMD's way, 990 vs 972, a 1.9% difference. PassMark single-thread reinforces this, with AMD ahead 3,738 vs 3,582, a 4.4% lead. These results point to the Zen 4 architecture's superior IPC and higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz against Intel's 4.70 GHz.

In mid-thread count scenarios, AMD maintains its edge. The 3DMark 8-thread test shows a 6.5% win (6,085 vs 5,712), and the 4-thread test goes 2.3% AMD's way (3,690 vs 3,607). The 2-thread and 16-thread tests both show 1.3% AMD advantages (1,924 vs 1,899 and 7,404 vs 7,307 respectively). Data encryption also favors AMD, 20,416 vs 19,267, a 6% margin. Integer math is close but AMD takes it, 97,747 vs 96,195, a 1.6% lead. The PassMark multithread score goes to AMD at 28,498 vs 27,753, a 2.7% win.

Now for Intel's counterpunches. The largest Intel victory is in PassMark physics, where the i5-13500HX scores 1,634 against AMD's 1,347, a 17.6% margin. Floating point math also strongly favors Intel, 70,885 vs 59,254, a 16.4% lead. These two results suggest Intel's Raptor Lake architecture handles physics simulations and raw floating-point throughput better, likely due to its higher core count and different execution resources.

The multi-core rendering tests go to Intel. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i5-13500HX scores 18,334 versus 16,192, an 11.7% advantage. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows a 10.1% Intel lead (2,863 vs 2,575). The 3DMark max-threads test also favors Intel, 7,885 vs 7,413, a 6% margin. Prime number finding goes Intel's way too, 98 vs 87, an 11.2% gap. These wins correlate directly with Intel's core configuration: 14 cores and 20 threads versus AMD's 8 cores and 16 threads. When all cores are saturated, Intel's additional cores provide a meaningful throughput advantage.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in single-threaded performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS wins every recorded single-thread test. The margins range from 1.9% in 3DMark single-thread to 9.5% in Cinebench R15 single-core. The PassMark single-thread test shows a 4.4% AMD lead (3,738 vs 3,582), and Cinebench R23 single-core shows a 2.2% edge (1,769 vs 1,730.5).

Q: Why does the Intel chip win multi-core rendering benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500HX has 14 cores and 20 threads compared to AMD's 8 cores and 16 threads. This core advantage shows in Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,334 vs 16,192, an 11.7% lead) and Cinebench R15 multi-core (2,863 vs 2,575, a 10.1% lead). The 3DMark max-threads test also favors Intel, 7,885 vs 7,413.

Q: How do the two compare in data compression workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS leads in PassMark data compression, scoring 344,439 versus Intel's 331,896, a 3.8% advantage. This suggests better efficiency in compression algorithms despite Intel's higher core count.

Q: Is there a significant difference in extended instruction set performance?

A: Yes, and it heavily favors AMD. The 8845HS scores 25,642 in PassMark extended instructions, while the i5-13500HX scores 20,200. That is a 26.9% gap, the largest single margin in the entire head-to-head comparison.

Q: Which chip is better for physics simulations?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500HX wins PassMark physics by a substantial 17.6% margin (1,634 vs 1,347). This is one of Intel's strongest results and suggests an advantage in physics-based workloads.

Q: What about overall average benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS has an average benchmark score of 29,955, compared to Intel's 29,270. Both sit at the 81st percentile among all CPUs in the database. The AMD chip is roughly 2.3% higher on average, but the nearest rival data shows the 8845HS is essentially tied with the Ryzen 7 7840HS and only 0.8% ahead of the Ryzen 5 9600X.

The Verdict

The data points to two different usage profiles. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is the better choice for single-threaded responsiveness, extended instruction workloads, data compression, encryption, and general multithreaded tasks at moderate thread counts. It wins 15 of 21 head-to-head tests and has a higher average benchmark score (29,955 vs 29,270). Users who prioritize snappy application performance, AVX-heavy code, or encryption tasks should lean toward the 8845HS.

The Intel Core i5-13500HX is the stronger pick for heavily parallel rendering and physics workloads. Its 14-core, 20-thread configuration delivers a decisive edge in Cinebench R23 multi-core (11.7% ahead) and Cinebench R15 multi-core (10.1% ahead). Floating point math and physics simulations also favor Intel by double-digit margins. If the workload saturates all available cores, the i5-13500HX will finish faster.

The broader database context shows both chips at the 81st percentile, meaning they are closely matched overall. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $326, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. The final choice should depend on whether the software stack is more sensitive to single-thread IPC (AMD) or raw core count (Intel).

Specification Differences

The core specifications diverge significantly. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-13500HX has 14 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks differ, with AMD at 3.80 GHz and Intel at 2.50 GHz. Boost clocks favor AMD at 5.10 GHz versus Intel's 4.70 GHz. Thermal design power also differs: AMD is rated at 45 W, Intel at 55 W.

Memory support shows a key split. AMD supports DDR5 only, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. AMD has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while Intel's memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. ECC memory support is present on Intel but absent on AMD. PCIe generation differs: AMD uses Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes.

The integrated graphics are different tiers. AMD pairs with Radeon 780M, Intel with UHD Graphics 710. The multiplier is unlocked on Intel but locked on AMD. Sockets are platform-specific: AMD Socket FP8 for the 8845HS, Intel BGA 1964 for the i5-13500HX. The AMD part has multiple part numbers (100-000001322, 100-000001384, 100-000001311), while Intel has a single part number (SRME7).

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is fundamental. AMD uses Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 178 mm² with 25,000 million transistors. Intel uses Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-HX codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The die size is larger at 257 mm², and transistor count is not recorded in the database.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. AMD provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L3 cache on Intel may contribute to its floating point and physics advantages, while AMD's smaller but faster cache layout supports its single-thread wins.

The release dates are close but not identical. Intel launched on 2023-01-03, while AMD followed on 2023-12-05. Both are active production parts in the mobile segment. No 3D V-Cache is present on either chip, and both lack recordable total L3 values beyond the shared figures.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS wins in scenarios that value per-core efficiency and instruction set breadth. The 26.9% lead in extended instructions makes it the clear choice for developers or analysts running AVX-heavy code. The 13.9% win in random string sorting points to advantages in database-like workloads and text processing. Data encryption (6% ahead) and data compression (3.8% ahead) make it suitable for security tools and archive utilities. Single-thread wins across Cinebench R15, R23, 3DMark, and PassMark indicate snappier everyday use, from application launch times to web browsing responsiveness. The 3DMark 8-thread win (6.5%) suggests better performance in moderately threaded games and productivity apps.

The Intel Core i5-13500HX wins where core count dominates. The 11.7% Cinebench R23 multi-core lead and 10.1% Cinebench R15 multi-core lead make it the pick for video rendering, 3D scene exports, and other fully parallel creative workloads. The 17.6% physics win indicates an edge in simulation software and physics-based game engines. The 16.4% floating point math lead suits scientific computing and financial modeling that rely on FPU throughput. The 6% max-threads 3DMark win reinforces its strength when all 20 threads are active. Prime number finding (11.2% ahead) suggests better performance in certain mathematical and cryptographic workloads.

The 81st percentile ranking for both parts shows neither is a slouch. The AMD chip is the all-rounder with more total wins, while the Intel chip is the specialized multi-core workhorse. Choose based on the workload mix, not the raw numbers alone.