AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX vs Intel Xeon 6724P Comparison

The Intel Xeon 6724P and AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX occupy opposite ends of the computing spectrum, yet their average benchmark scores land within 0.8% of each other. The Xeon is a 16-core, 32-thread Granite Rapids server processor with a 210W TDP, while the Ryzen is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 mobile part rated at just 55W. Benchmark results show the Xeon dominates 11 of 13 head-to-head tests, often by massive margins, but the Ryzen counters with a single-thread victory that hints at its higher boost clock. This comparison is less about which is "faster" and more about which workload profile each chip serves.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Xeon 6724P has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Xeon also carries a larger shared L3 cache at 72 MB versus 64 MB on the Ryzen.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Xeon 6724P posts an average benchmark score of 72396, while the Ryzen 7 8840HX scores 71797. This puts the Xeon 0.8% ahead according to its nearestRivals data, and both chips rank in the 94th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Which chip wins in single-threaded performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX wins the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 3958, beating the Xeon's 3279 by 17.2%. This aligns with the Ryzen's 5.10 GHz boost clock versus the Xeon's 4.30 GHz.

Q: Is there a major difference in memory bandwidth?

A: Yes, and it is substantial. The Xeon 6724P supports eight-channel DDR5 memory with 409.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the Ryzen 7 8840HX uses dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s. The Xeon also supports ECC memory; the Ryzen does not.

Q: What are the socket and platform differences?

A: The Xeon uses Intel Socket 4710 and is a server/workstation part, while the Ryzen uses AMD Socket FL1 and is a mobile processor. The Xeon offers 88 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, whereas the Ryzen provides 28 Gen 5 lanes.

Q: Which chip has integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX includes a Radeon 610M iGPU, while the Intel Xeon 6724P has no integrated graphics (N/A). The Ryzen also has an unlocked multiplier; the Xeon does not.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Xeon 6724P is built on Granite Rapids architecture using a 5 nm process from Intel's own foundry. It packs 16 cores and 32 threads with a per-core L1 cache of 112 KB and a per-core L2 of 2 MB, backed by 72 MB of shared L3. This is a data-center part designed for sustained, memory-hungry workloads, reflected in its eight-channel memory bus and 409.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Xeon supports ECC memory, which is critical for server reliability, and offers 88 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for extensive I/O expansion.

The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX uses Zen 4 architecture on a 5 nm process fabricated by TSMC. It has 12 cores and 24 threads, with smaller per-core caches (64 KB L1, 1 MB L2) but a still-generous 64 MB shared L3. Its transistor count is listed at 13,140 million across a dual-die design measuring 2x 71 mm². The Ryzen targets mobile performance, using a dual-channel memory bus that caps bandwidth at 83.2 GB/s. It lacks ECC support and includes a Radeon 610M integrated GPU, making it a self-contained mobile solution. The Ryzen also has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, a feature absent on the server-focused Xeon.

The memory subsystem gap is the defining architectural difference. The Xeon's eight-channel setup delivers nearly five times the theoretical bandwidth of the Ryzen's dual-channel configuration. This matters for workloads like data compression and encryption, where the Xeon's advantages are pronounced. Meanwhile, the Ryzen's higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 4.30 GHz gives it an edge in latency-sensitive single-thread tasks, despite having fewer cores.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split. The Intel Xeon 6724P is the choice for multi-threaded, memory-intensive server and workstation workloads. It wins 11 of 13 head-to-head benchmarks, including a 72.7% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core (43643 vs 25265) and a 129% margin in PassMark physics (5004 vs 2185). Its 210W TDP and eight-channel memory are built for sustained throughput, and its ECC support and 88 PCIe lanes target data-center deployments.

The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX is for mobile users who need strong single-thread performance and power efficiency. It wins the PassMark single-thread test by 17.2% (3958 vs 3279) and consumes only 55W TDP, making it suitable for laptops where thermals and battery life matter. Its integrated Radeon 610M GPU eliminates the need for a discrete graphics card in basic systems.

Pick the Xeon if you prioritize raw parallel compute, memory bandwidth, and server-grade features. Pick the Ryzen if you need a low-power, high-clock mobile chip with iGPU capabilities. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical, but the workload profiles are entirely different.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon 6724P | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 16 | 12 |

| Threads | 32 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 3.60 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 210 W | 55 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 4710 | AMD Socket FL1 |

| Architecture | Granite Rapids | Zen 4 |

| Process Node | 5 nm (Intel) | 5 nm (TSMC) |

| L1 Cache | 112 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 72 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Eight-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 409.6 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 88 Lanes | Gen 5, 28 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | N/A | Radeon 610M |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Mobile |

| Launch MSRP | $3622 | N/A |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Xeon 6724P sweeps nearly every multi-threaded test, but the margins vary wildly. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Xeon scores 43643 against the Ryzen's 25265, a 72.7% advantage that reflects both the core count difference and the Xeon's superior memory bandwidth. The single-core Cinebench R23 test is even more lopsided in the Xeon's favor, with 6161 versus 1857 — a 231.8% lead that is surprising given the Ryzen's higher boost clock.

PassMark results show a more nuanced picture. The Xeon leads in floating-point math by 56.1% (135404 vs 86747) and in extended instructions by 48.1% (54101 vs 36527). Data compression favors the Xeon at 627185 versus 496427, a 26.3% gap, while data encryption shows a smaller 14.7% lead (34332 vs 29919). Integer math is closer, with the Xeon ahead 17.5% (172216 vs 146506), and random string sorting shows an 18.1% edge (68477 vs 57971).

The Xeon's biggest wins come in physics and prime-number finding. PassMark physics shows a 129% margin (5004 vs 2185), while find prime numbers has the Xeon at 372 versus 304, a 22.4% lead. Multithread performance is 23% higher on the Xeon (51345 vs 41732). The only two tests the Ryzen wins are PassMark single-thread and singlethread, both identical at 3958 versus 3279, giving the AMD chip a 17.2% advantage in that specific metric.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon 6724P wins in every scenario that scales with cores and memory bandwidth. Data compression, encryption, floating-point math, and extended instruction workloads all show double-digit percentage leads. The 72.7% multi-core Cinebench lead makes it the obvious pick for rendering, simulation, and other parallel compute tasks. The 129% physics score advantage suggests strong performance in physics-based simulations, common in engineering and scientific computing. Its 409.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and ECC support make it suitable for large in-memory databases and virtualized environments.

The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX wins in single-threaded performance, as shown by its 17.2% PassMark single-thread lead. This translates to snappier response in lightly threaded applications like web browsing, office productivity, and legacy software that doesn't scale across cores. Its 55W TDP and integrated Radeon 610M GPU make it the better fit for laptops and compact systems where power draw and space are constraints. The unlocked multiplier offers overclocking headroom for enthusiasts who want to push clock speeds further.

For a server rack, the Xeon's 88 PCIe lanes and eight-channel memory are non-negotiable. For a mobile workstation, the Ryzen's 28 lanes and dual-channel memory are adequate, and its 5.10 GHz boost clock delivers strong single-core responsiveness. The Xeon's 210W TDP requires serious cooling, while the Ryzen's 55W TDP fits in thin chassis. Choose based on the physical platform and the workload's threading profile; the benchmark data shows the Xeon is the multi-thread king, and the Ryzen is the single-thread efficiency champion.