AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX vs Intel Core i9-14901TE Comparison

AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX vs Intel Core i9-14901TE

The database records a sharp contrast between these two eight-core, sixteen-thread processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX, a mobile part from the 8000 series, carries a complete set of PassMark benchmark scores, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE, a desktop chip from the Core 14th Gen lineup, has no recorded benchmark results in the database. This asymmetry forces the analysis to lean on the AMD chip’s measured performance, its percentile ranking, and the specification sheets for both parts. The data shows that the Ryzen 7 8745HX sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60,104, whereas the Core i9-14901TE holds a 50th percentile ranking with an average score of zero. The Intel part’s empty benchmark array means head-to-head wins cannot be computed; the database lists zero wins for each side. What follows is a detailed walk through the available numbers, a verdict grounded in the measured data, a FAQ drawn from the recorded fields, and a breakdown of the specification and architecture differences.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark array in the database is empty, so there are no direct comparison scores for the Ryzen 7 8745HX versus the Core i9-14901TE. However, the Ryzen 7 8745HX’s individual PassMark results provide a complete picture of its capabilities. The single-thread score is recorded twice, once as 3,879 and again as 3,879, confirming consistency. The multi-thread score is 31,517. Integer math reaches 100,328, floating point math hits 61,972, and extended instructions score 27,638. Data encryption is measured at 21,840, data compression at 363,759, and random string sorting at 44,494. The physics test returns 1,681, and the prime number search scores 159. These numbers place the Ryzen 7 8745HX at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60,104.

The nearest rivals in the database for the Ryzen 7 8745HX are four other processors. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX has an average score of 60,099, which is a delta of 0 percent relative to the Ryzen 7 8745HX. The Intel Core i9-14900F scores 60,008, a delta of 0.2 percent, meaning the Ryzen 7 8745HX is 0.2 percent ahead. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D averages 59,641, a delta of 0.8 percent, so the Ryzen 7 8745HX is 0.8 percent ahead. The Intel Xeon Gold 6338T scores 60,572, a delta of -0.8 percent, meaning the Xeon is 0.8 percent ahead of the Ryzen 7 8745HX. These deltas are small, indicating that the Ryzen 7 8745HX performs in a tight cluster with these four chips, neither dominating nor being dominated by a wide margin.

For the Core i9-14901TE, the database contains no benchmarks and no nearest rivals. Its percentile ranking of 50 is based on the lack of recorded data, not on any measured performance. The average benchmark score of zero confirms that no tests have been logged for this part. Consequently, any comparison between the two chips must rely on the Ryzen 7 8745HX’s scores alone, with the understanding that the Intel chip’s performance is unmeasured in this database.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the Ryzen 7 8745HX is the only chip with verified performance figures. Its average benchmark score of 60,104 and 92nd percentile ranking indicate a high-performing processor, competitive with the Ryzen 9 7945HX and the Core i9-14900F, both of which score within 0.2 percent. The Core i9-14901TE, with zero recorded benchmarks, cannot be compared on measured performance. The database shows no wins for either chip in head-to-head testing because no such tests exist. For anyone selecting between these two, the data supports the Ryzen 7 8745HX as the part with demonstrated capability, especially in multi-threaded workloads where its 31,517 multi-thread score and 100,328 integer math score reflect strong throughput. The Intel chip’s 50th percentile ranking, based on no data, offers no evidence of competitive performance. The verdict is straightforward: the Ryzen 7 8745HX is the validated choice from the database, while the Core i9-14901TE remains an unknown quantity until benchmark results are recorded.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX?

A: The average benchmark score is 60,104, placing it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-14901TE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists an empty benchmark array for the Core i9-14901TE, with an average benchmark score of zero and a 50th percentile ranking.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 8745HX compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 7945HX is 0 percent different in average score, the Core i9-14900F is 0.2 percent behind, the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is 0.8 percent behind, and the Xeon Gold 6338T is 0.8 percent ahead.

Q: What is the single-thread score for the Ryzen 7 8745HX?

A: The single-thread score is 3,879, recorded identically in two benchmark entries.

Q: What is the multi-thread score for the Ryzen 7 8745HX?

A: The multi-thread score is 31,517.

Q: Are there any head-to-head benchmark wins for either processor?

A: No, the head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the database records zero wins for both the Ryzen 7 8745HX and the Core i9-14901TE.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The Ryzen 7 8745HX has a base clock of 3.60 GHz, while the Core i9-14901TE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz. The boost clock is 5.10 GHz for the AMD chip and 5.50 GHz for the Intel chip. The thermal design power is 55 watts for the Ryzen 7 8745HX and 45 watts for the Core i9-14901TE. The socket types are different: AMD Socket FL1 for the Ryzen 7 8745HX, Intel Socket 1700 for the Core i9-14901TE. The market segments differ, with the AMD part classified as Mobile and the Intel part as Desktop. The multiplier is unlocked on the Ryzen 7 8745HX, but locked on the Core i9-14901TE. The integrated graphics are Radeon 610M for the AMD chip and UHD Graphics 770 for the Intel chip. The Ryzen 7 8745HX supports only DDR5 memory, while the Core i9-14901TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bandwidth is listed as 83.2 GB/s for the AMD part, with no bandwidth figure recorded for the Intel part. ECC memory is false for the Ryzen 7 8745HX and true for the Core i9-14901TE. The PCIe configuration shows Gen 5 with 28 lanes for the AMD chip and Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the Intel chip. The release dates are 2025-04-22 for the Ryzen 7 8745HX and 2024-06-30 for the Core i9-14901TE. The part numbers are 100-000001851 for AMD and Q49CSRNJJ for Intel.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is clear. The Ryzen 7 8745HX uses Zen 4 architecture with the Dragon Range codename, built on a 5 nm process node by TSMC. The die size is 71 mm², and the transistor count is recorded as 6,570 million. The Core i9-14901TE uses Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, built on a 10 nm process node by Intel. The die size is 257 mm², and no transistor count is listed. The cache layouts differ. The Ryzen 7 8745HX has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i9-14901TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Both chips have 8 cores and 16 threads, but the underlying designs diverge: the AMD part is a dense 5 nm mobile chip with a smaller die, while the Intel part is a larger 10 nm desktop chip. The Ryzen 7 8745HX belongs to the 8000 series and the Ryzen 7 generation, while the Core i9-14901TE belongs to the Core 14th Gen and the Core i9 generation. The production status is active for both. The foundry difference, TSMC versus Intel, is a notable architectural distinction, as is the process node disparity, 5 nm versus 10 nm. The Ryzen 7 8745HX does not support ECC memory, while the Core i9-14901TE does, which may reflect different target markets: mobile for AMD, desktop for Intel. The PCIe lane count, 28 versus 16, also shows divergent platform capabilities.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the database, the Ryzen 7 8745HX wins in every measurable category because it is the only chip with recorded scores. Its benchmark results show strengths in specific workloads. The data compression score of 363,759 is the highest individual PassMark test recorded for this chip, indicating strong performance in compression tasks. The integer math score of 100,328 suggests solid integer-heavy computation. The multi-thread score of 31,517 points to good parallel processing. The single-thread score of 3,879 is modest but consistent. The floating point math score of 61,972 and the extended instructions score of 27,638 round out the picture. The physics score of 1,681 and the prime number score of 159 are lower, but these are less common workloads.

The Core i9-14901TE has no wins in the database because no benchmarks exist. Its specification sheet hints at potential advantages: a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz versus 5.10 GHz, a larger L3 cache of 36 MB versus 32 MB, more L1 and L2 cache per core, ECC memory support, and a lower TDP of 45 watts versus 55 watts. These fields suggest that the Intel chip might excel in power-constrained desktop scenarios or memory-heavy tasks, but the absence of measured scores prevents any confirmation. The Ryzen 7 8745HX, with its 5 nm process and higher base clock, has the recorded performance edge. The database shows the AMD part as the only validated performer, and its 92nd percentile ranking across all CPUs reinforces that position. For use cases involving compression, integer math, or multithreaded workloads, the Ryzen 7 8745HX’s scores provide direct evidence of capability. For the Core i9-14901TE, the data is silent, so any win for that chip remains hypothetical rather than measured.