AMD Ryzen 7 8700G vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Intel Core Ultra 9 285 occupy different tiers of the desktop processor market, and the benchmark data reflects a clear performance hierarchy. Across the recorded head-to-head tests, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 secures a decisive victory in all 15 comparisons, with the Ryzen 7 8700G failing to claim a single win. The average benchmark score for the Intel part is 75488, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD chip averages 33089, landing in the 83rd percentile. These figures establish the Core Ultra 9 285 as the dominant performer, though the Ryzen 7 8700G retains relevance through its integrated graphics and platform characteristics.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most pronounced gap between the two processors appears in multi-threaded rendering workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 scores 48945 against the Ryzen 7 8700G's 17128, a delta of 65% in favor of Intel. The Cinebench R15 multi-core test tells a similar story, with Intel at 4933 and AMD at 2693, a 45.4% difference. These results align with the core configuration disparity: the Intel chip uses 24 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD chip provides 8 cores and 16 threads.

Single-core performance also favors Intel, though by a smaller margin. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Core Ultra 9 285 posts 6909 versus 1817 for the Ryzen 7 8700G, a 73.7% lead. The Cinebench R15 single-core test shows Intel at 696 and AMD at 286, a 58.9% advantage. PassMark single-thread scores are closer: Intel reaches 4881 and AMD 3928, a 19.5% difference. The data indicates that the Intel architecture delivers substantially higher per-thread throughput, which carries into lightly threaded applications.

Memory and compression workloads amplify the Intel lead. PassMark data compression shows Intel at 602121 and AMD at 386811, a 35.8% gap. Integer math results are closer in relative terms, with Intel at 164869 and AMD at 103107, a 37.5% difference. Floating-point math heavily favors Intel, 194988 versus 63815, representing a 67.3% gap. Extended instruction workloads follow the same pattern, with Intel at 45357 and AMD at 29067, a 35.9% difference.

The largest relative margin appears in the prime number search test, where Intel scores 459 against AMD's 103, a 77.6% lead. Physics simulation also skews strongly toward Intel, 3598 versus 1647, a 54.2% gap. Data encryption shows Intel at 46949 and AMD at 22842, a 51.3% advantage, while random string sorting sees Intel at 73651 and AMD at 46025, a 37.5% edge. The multithread PassMark score, a broad indicator of parallel capability, gives Intel 56602 and AMD 31690, a 44% lead.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 records an average benchmark score of 75488, compared to 33089 for the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G.

Q: How do the two CPUs compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 scores 48945, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G scores 17128, giving Intel a 65% advantage.

Q: Does the AMD processor win any head-to-head benchmark?

A: No. The recorded data shows the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 winning all 15 head-to-head tests, with zero wins for the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G.

Q: What is the closest benchmark result between the two?

A: The PassMark single-thread and singlethread tests show the smallest gap, with Intel at 4881 and AMD at 3928, a 19.5% difference.

Q: Which CPU has a higher percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 sits in the 95th percentile, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G sits in the 83rd percentile.

Q: What memory bandwidth figures are recorded for each processor?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 supports 102.4 GB/s, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G supports 83.2 GB/s.

The Verdict

The data directs users toward the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 for any workload where raw performance is the primary criterion. It wins every recorded benchmark, leads by at least 19.5% in the closest test, and exceeds the AMD chip by 65% or more in several multi-threaded and single-threaded Cinebench tests. Its 95th percentile standing versus the 83rd percentile for AMD confirms a wide overall gap. The Ryzen 7 8700G carries a launch MSRP of $329, while the Intel part has a launch MSRP of $579, but the performance differential in the database is consistent and substantial across all measured categories.

For users prioritizing integrated graphics, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G includes a Radeon 780M, whereas the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 includes an Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. The AMD chip also offers an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel part is locked. These factors matter for specific use cases, but they do not alter the benchmark hierarchy. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is the stronger processor in every measured computation, from single-thread responsiveness to heavily parallel rendering and encryption tasks.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G provides 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 provides 24 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks differ significantly, with AMD at 4.20 GHz and Intel at 2.50 GHz, but boost clocks reverse the order, AMD at 5.10 GHz and Intel at 5.60 GHz. Both parts carry a 65 W TDP. Cache layouts diverge sharply: the AMD chip uses 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3, while the Intel chip uses 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3.

Memory support shows both using DDR5 and dual-channel buses, but bandwidth differs, with AMD at 83.2 GB/s and Intel at 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory support is absent on the AMD part and present on the Intel part. PCIe generation and lane counts differ as well, with AMD using Gen 4 with 20 lanes and Intel using Gen 5 with 20 lanes. The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier; the Intel processor does not. Release dates place the AMD chip in January 2024 and the Intel chip in December 2024. The die size also varies, with AMD at 178 mm² and Intel at 243 mm².

Architecture Differences

The architectural foundations of these processors are entirely distinct. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G belongs to the 8000 series and uses the Zen 4 architecture under the codename Phoenix, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 25,000 million transistors. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 and uses the Arrow Lake architecture under the codename Arrow Lake-S, built on a 3 nm process at TSMC with 17,800 million transistors. The AMD chip is described as Ryzen 7 (Zen 4 (Phoenix)), while the Intel chip is described as Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake).

L1 and L2 cache structures reflect different design philosophies. AMD provisions 64 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, while Intel provisions 192 KB of L1 per core and 3 MB of L2 per core. L3 cache totals also favor Intel, 36 MB shared versus 16 MB shared for AMD. Neither processor uses 3D V-Cache. The integrated graphics solutions differ, with AMD offering a Radeon 780M and Intel offering an Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. Socket requirements separate the platforms, with AMD on Socket AM5 and Intel on Socket 1851.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 wins in every recorded benchmark category, so its strengths cover the entire tested workload spectrum. The largest advantages appear in prime number search, floating-point math, and Cinebench R23 multi-core, where Intel leads by 77.6%, 67.3%, and 65% respectively. These results indicate a strong fit for scientific computing, financial modeling, and rendering tasks that rely on sustained parallel throughput. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth and Gen 5 PCIe support reinforce its position for data-heavy desktop workloads.

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G shows no benchmark victories in the data, but its platform attributes define its role. The integrated Radeon 780M provides a graphics solution that is absent in terms of benchmark comparisons here, and the unlocked multiplier allows clock adjustment for users who seek tuning flexibility. Its 65 W TDP matches the Intel part, but its smaller transistor count and lower memory bandwidth point to a less demanding silicon design. The AMD chip also carries the lower launch MSRP of $329, which positions it differently in the market despite the performance gap. For users who need maximum computational output, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is the unambiguous choice based on the recorded measurements.