AMD Ryzen 7 8700G vs Intel Core i7-13650HX Comparison

The Intel Core i7-13650HX and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G land at the exact same average benchmark score of 33089, placing both at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Despite this statistical tie, the data reveals two very different processors with distinct workloads where each pulls ahead. The Intel chip is a 14-core mobile powerhouse built for heavy multi-threaded rendering, while the AMD is an 8-core desktop part with a faster boost clock and a much stronger integrated GPU. The benchmark results show a clear split: Intel wins on raw sustained multi-core performance and single-core legacy tests, while AMD dominates in mid-thread workloads and everyday productivity tasks.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-13650HX takes the crown in workloads that scale to its full 20-thread capacity. The biggest win comes in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where Intel scores 24580 against AMD's 17128 — a massive 43.5% advantage. This is the kind of result that matters for video rendering, 3D modeling, and batch processing. Intel also wins in 3DMark max threads with 8741 versus 7917 (10.4% ahead), and floating-point math with a score of 75643 against 63815 (18.5% ahead). Physics simulation also favors Intel, with a 1745 score versus 1647 (6% ahead).

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G dominates in the 4-to-8 thread range, which is where most modern games and productivity applications operate. The 3DMark 8-thread test shows AMD at 6589 versus Intel's 5871, a 10.9% lead. AMD also wins the 4-thread test at 3825 versus 3698 (3.3% ahead). In Cinebench R15 multi-core, AMD takes a 8% lead with 2693 against 2477. AMD further demonstrates strength in integer-heavy tasks: PassMark integer math shows a near tie at 103107 versus 102929 (0.2% ahead), but extended instructions show a decisive 20.4% lead for AMD at 29067 versus 23146. Random string sorting also favors AMD at 46025 versus 41162 (10.6% ahead).

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It uses Raptor Lake architecture with 14 cores and 20 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores. The cache layout is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode and includes ECC memory support. The chip comes with UHD Graphics 710 integrated graphics. It uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket and is classified as a mobile segment part. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes.

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is a fundamentally different design. It uses TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Zen 4 (Phoenix) architecture provides 8 cores and 16 threads, all full-size performance cores. Cache is smaller per core: 64 KB L1 and 1 MB L2, with 16 MB of shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 only, dual-channel, with a listed bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC is not supported. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics is significantly more capable than Intel's UHD 710. It uses the AMD Socket AM5 and is a desktop part. PCIe is Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes.

The clock speeds tell part of the story. Intel has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and boost of 4.90 GHz. AMD starts higher at 4.20 GHz base and boosts to 5.10 GHz. The TDP differs as well: Intel is rated at 55 watts, AMD at 65 watts. Both have unlocked multipliers. Intel's release date is 2023-01-03, while AMD's is 2024-01-07.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The single-core results are striking in their inconsistency. In 3DMark single-thread, Intel wins narrowly at 1015 versus 1010 (0.5% ahead). But in Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel delivers a crushing 3470 versus 1817 — a 91% lead. The R15 single-core test also goes to Intel at 349 versus 286 (22% ahead). However, PassMark single-thread flips the script: AMD wins 3928 versus 3769 (4% ahead). This pattern suggests Intel's single-core advantage is highly workload-specific, not universal.

Multi-threaded results show a similar split. Cinebench R23 multi-core is Intel's biggest victory at 43.5% ahead. But 3DMark 16-threads shows a much tighter race: Intel at 8060 versus AMD at 7918 (1.8% ahead). PassMark multithread actually favors AMD at 31690 versus 30704 (3.1% ahead). The Cinebench R15 multi-core test also goes to AMD at 2693 versus 2477 (8% ahead). These conflicting results indicate that Intel's 14-core advantage only pays off in sustained, heavily optimized workloads, while AMD's higher clocked 8 cores handle shorter and lighter multi-threaded tasks better.

Data-centric tasks show AMD consistently ahead. Data compression: 386811 versus 383943 (0.7% ahead). Data encryption: 22842 versus 21649 (5.2% ahead). Find prime numbers is a dead tie at 103 for both. The biggest gap in this category is extended instructions at 20.4% for AMD, which covers AVX and SIMD workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is better for Cinebench R23 multi-core rendering?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX wins decisively with a score of 24580 versus 17128 for the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, a 43.5% advantage.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G have better single-thread performance?

A: It depends on the test. AMD wins PassMark single-thread at 3928 versus 3769 (4% ahead), but Intel wins Cinebench R23 single-core by 91% (3470 versus 1817) and R15 single-core by 22% (349 versus 286).

Q: Which chip handles 8-thread workloads better?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G wins the 3DMark 8-thread test with 6589 versus 5871, a 10.9% lead. This suggests AMD is better for typical gaming and multitasking loads.

Q: What are the integrated graphics differences?

A: Intel includes UHD Graphics 710, while AMD has the Radeon 780M. The AMD part is positioned for stronger graphical performance in a desktop APU context.

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Is there a difference in memory support?

A: Yes. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with ECC capability. AMD supports DDR5 only, without ECC, but with a rated bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear use-case split. Choose the Intel Core i7-13650HX if your primary workloads are heavily multi-threaded rendering, floating-point math, or physics simulation. The 43.5% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 18.5% lead in floating-point math make it the obvious pick for content creation on the go. It also wins in 3DMark max threads and physics, indicating strong scaling across all its 20 threads.

Choose the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G if you need a desktop processor that handles mid-thread workloads, data encryption, and extended instruction sets with better efficiency. The 10.9% lead in 3DMark 8-thread and 20.4% lead in extended instructions make it strong for gaming and productivity. The 4% lead in PassMark single-thread and 3.1% lead in multithread suggest better everyday responsiveness. The Radeon 780M integrated graphics also gives it a significant edge for systems without a discrete GPU.

Both chips sit at the 83rd percentile with identical average scores of 33089. The Intel part has a higher launch MSRP of $485, while AMD's is $329. The Intel chip is newer in release date (2023-01-03 versus 2024-01-07) but targets mobile, while AMD targets desktop. Ultimately, the decision comes down to whether your software scales to 14 cores or prefers 8 faster ones.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-13650HX | AMD Ryzen 7 8700G |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 14 | 8 |

| Threads | 20 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.60 GHz | 4.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 55 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1964 | AMD Socket AM5 |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not listed | 25,000 million |

| Die Size | 257 mm² | 178 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 83.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 20 Lanes | Gen 4, 20 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 | Radeon 780M |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Launch MSRP | $485 | $329 |