AMD Ryzen 7 8700G vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G

CORE STATE Phoenix
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4.2 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
AMD
AMD

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

CORE STATE Rembrandt
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3+
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_16_threads
7,918
N/A
3dmark_2_threads
1,978
N/A
3dmark_4_threads
3,825
N/A
3dmark_8_threads
6,589
N/A
3dmark_max_threads
7,917
N/A
3dmark_single_thread
1,010
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,693
2,153
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
286
260
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
17,128
13,501
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,817
1,615
geekbench_multicore
14,584
9,571
geekbench_singlecore
2,337
1,996
passmark_data_compression
386,811
297,936
passmark_data_encryption
22,842
18,673
passmark_extended_instructions
29,067
20,302
passmark_find_prime_numbers
103
62
passmark_floating_point_math
63,815
48,821
passmark_integer_math
103,107
87,132
passmark_multithread
31,690
23,770
passmark_physics
1,647
1,115
passmark_random_string_sorting
46,025
30,859
passmark_single_thread
3,928
3,326
passmark_singlethread
3,928
3,326

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 8700G vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G are both 8-core, 16-thread processors from AMD, yet they target entirely different platforms and generations. The 6950H is a mobile part from the 6000 series built on the Zen 3+ architecture, while the 8700G is a desktop processor from the 8000 series using the newer Zen 4 architecture. Benchmark data shows a decisive performance advantage for the 8700G across every single tested workload, with the Ryzen 7 winning all 17 head-to-head comparisons. This analysis breaks down the architectural and specification differences, examines the benchmark results in detail, and determines which processor is suited for which use case based strictly on the provided data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H has an average benchmark score of 33201, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G scores 33089. The 6950H is rated in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, and the 8700G is also in the 83rd percentile.

Q: How large is the performance gap in multi-core rendering?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen 7 8700G scores 17128 compared to the 6950H's 13501. This represents a 21.2% advantage for the 8700G, as indicated by the deltaPct of -21.2 for the 6950H.

Q: Are there any benchmarks where the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H wins?

A: According to the head-to-head data, the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H does not win any of the 17 recorded benchmarks. The Ryzen 7 8700G wins all 17 comparisons.

Q: What is the difference in single-core performance?

A: In Geekbench single-core, the 8700G scores 2337, while the 6950H scores 1996. The 8700G leads by 14.6% in this test. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the 8700G's 1817 score beats the 6950H's 1615 by 11.1%.

Q: How do their memory bandwidth specifications compare?

A: The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Ryzen 7 8700G has a higher memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. Both support DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700G has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is higher than the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H's boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The 8700G also has a higher base clock of 4.20 GHz compared to 3.30 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures and process nodes. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G uses the newer Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix, built on a more advanced 4 nm process, also at TSMC. This process shrink is a primary driver of the performance differential, as it allows for higher clock speeds and improved efficiency.

The transistor counts and die sizes differ significantly. The 8700G contains 25,000 million transistors on a die size of 178 mm². The 6950H's transistor count is not specified in the data, but its die size is larger at 208 mm². The smaller die on the newer process node for the 8700G suggests a more densely packed design that contributes to its performance advantage.

Cache hierarchies also differ between the two. Both processors share 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. However, the L2 cache differs: the 6950H has 512 KB per core, while the 8700G has 1 MB per core. This doubling of L2 cache on the 8700G provides a larger on-die storage buffer for frequently accessed data, which can reduce latency and improve throughput in many workloads.

The integrated graphics represent another architectural divergence. The 6950H features a Radeon 680M, while the 8700G is equipped with a more powerful Radeon 780M. The 8700G's newer integrated graphics solution is part of the Phoenix design and benefits from the same Zen 4-era improvements, making it a more capable IGP for tasks that rely on the GPU.

Finally, the market segments and sockets are entirely different. The 6950H is a mobile processor using AMD Socket FP7, whereas the 8700G is a desktop processor using AMD Socket AM5. The 8700G also has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking, while the 6950H's multiplier is locked. The 6950H belongs to the 6000 series and was released in 2022, while the 8700G is from the 8000 series with a release date in 2024.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results paint a consistent picture: the Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H in every measured category. The largest margin of victory comes in Geekbench multi-core, where the 8700G scores 14584 against the 6950H's 9571. This is a 34.4% advantage, the biggest delta in the entire dataset. This substantial lead suggests the 8700G's Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds translate into significantly better multi-threaded integer and floating-point performance.

Cinebench results also show strong 8700G dominance. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 8700G scores 17128, beating the 6950H's 13501 by 21.2%. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the 8700G's 2693 score is 20.1% higher than the 6950H's 2153. Single-core performance is closer but still favors the 8700G. Cinebench R23 single-core shows an 11.1% gap (1817 vs 1615), while Cinebench R15 single-core shows a 9.1% gap (286 vs 260). Geekbench single-core reveals a 14.6% lead for the 8700G, with scores of 2337 and 1996 respectively.

PassMark tests further reinforce the 8700G's superiority. In PassMark multi-thread, the 8700G scores 31690 compared to 23770, a 25% advantage. The most extreme difference is in PassMark find prime numbers, where the 8700G scores 103 against the 6950H's 62, a 39.8% delta. This test is highly sensitive to raw integer throughput and clock speed, where the 8700G's 5.10 GHz boost clock provides a clear edge.

Other PassMark results show similar trends. Data compression favors the 8700G by 23% (386811 vs 297936), while data encryption shows an 18.3% gap (22842 vs 18673). Extended instructions, floating-point math, and integer math all show 8700G leads of 30.2%, 23.5%, and 15.5% respectively. Random string sorting and physics tests also go to the 8700G by margins of 33% and 32.3%. The 8700G's single-thread score of 3928 is 15.3% higher than the 6950H's 3326, matching the delta seen in the singlethread test, which is the same score.

Specification Differences

The specifications where these two processors differ are numerous and directly explain the benchmark outcomes. The base clock is a major differentiator: the 6950H runs at 3.30 GHz, while the 8700G runs at 4.20 GHz. Boost clocks follow suit, with the 8700G at 5.10 GHz versus the 6950H's 4.90 GHz. The 8700G's higher clocks are enabled by its more advanced 4 nm process and its desktop-class 65 W TDP, compared to the 6950H's mobile-oriented 45 W TDP.

The process node is a key architectural difference, with the 6950H using 6 nm and the 8700G using 4 nm. Die size and transistor counts also differ: the 6950H has a 208 mm² die, while the 8700G has a 178 mm² die and is specified with 25,000 million transistors. The L2 cache is doubled on the 8700G at 1 MB per core versus 512 KB per core on the 6950H. Memory bandwidth is higher on the 8700G at 83.2 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s.

The sockets are incompatible, with the 6950H using AMD Socket FP7 and the 8700G using AMD Socket AM5. The integrated graphics differ, with the 6950H featuring Radeon 680M and the 8700G featuring Radeon 780M. The market segment is another clear split: the 6950H is a mobile processor, while the 8700G is a desktop processor. Finally, the multiplier is unlocked on the 8700G, allowing user overclocking, while the 6950H's multiplier is locked. The 8700G has a launch MSRP of $329.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is the faster processor in every benchmark recorded. It wins all 17 head-to-head tests, with margins ranging from 9.1% to 39.8%. The 8700G's advantages in clock speed, architecture, and cache size give it a clear performance lead across single-core, multi-core, and specialized workloads. For users seeking maximum performance in a desktop context, the 8700G is the superior choice based on this data.

The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, however, is not without its place. It is a mobile processor designed for laptops, and its 45 W TDP is tailored for that form factor. Its average benchmark score of 33201 is actually slightly higher than the 8700G's 33089, and both sit in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. This indicates that the 6950H is a highly capable mobile part, offering performance that rivals many desktop CPUs, but it cannot match the 8700G in raw throughput.

The choice between the two depends entirely on the platform. For a desktop build, the 8700G is the obvious pick, offering superior performance, an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, and a newer socket. For a mobile workstation or laptop, the 6950H is the only viable option among the two, given its FP7 socket and mobile market segment. The 8700G's 65 W TDP is also higher, reflecting its desktop orientation, while the 6950H's 45 W TDP is more suited to battery-powered devices.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 7 8700G wins in every benchmark category, making it the clear choice for performance-intensive desktop workloads. Its largest margins come in multi-threaded and math-heavy tasks. The 39.8% lead in PassMark find prime numbers and the 34.4% lead in Geekbench multi-core highlight its strength in integer-heavy calculations and general multi-core productivity. The 25% advantage in PassMark multi-thread and the 21.2% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core make it ideal for rendering, video encoding, and other content creation tasks where every bit of multi-core performance counts.

The 8700G also excels in memory and data-intensive operations. Its 23% lead in data compression and 18.3% lead in data encryption show that its higher memory bandwidth and larger L2 cache translate to real-world gains in file archiving and security workloads. The 33% advantage in random string sorting further underscores its superiority in data manipulation tasks. For single-core responsiveness, the 8700G's 15.3% lead in PassMark single-thread and 14.6% lead in Geekbench single-core mean snappier application launches and better performance in lightly-threaded software.

The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H does not win any benchmark, but its strengths lie in its mobility and efficiency profile. As a mobile processor with a 45 W TDP, it is designed for laptops where power draw and heat dissipation are critical constraints. Its average benchmark score of 33201 is competitive with desktop parts like the Intel Core i7-14701E, which scores 33206, and it slightly edges out the 8700G's average score. For users who need 8-core, 16-thread performance in a portable form factor, the 6950H is the relevant choice, even if it cannot match the 8700G's absolute performance.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
7 8700G
9 PRO 6950H
Core Specs
Cores
8
8 0.0%
Threads
16
16 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
4.2
3.3 -21.4%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.9 -3.9%
Frequency (GHz)
4.2
3.3 -21.4%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.9 -3.9%
Multiplier
42
33 -21.4%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
512 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
16 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
45 -30.8%
PPT
61-88 W
—
Configurable TDP
45 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 3+
Codename
Phoenix
Rembrandt
Generation
Ryzen 7 (Zen 4 (Phoenix))
Ryzen 9 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt))
Process Size
4 nm
6 nm
Transistors
25,000 million
—
Die Size
178 mm²
208 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
AMD Socket FP7
Chipsets
X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
—
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 16 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 780M
Radeon 680M
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$329
—
Part Number
100-000001236
100-000000541100-000000563
Package
FC-LGA1718
FP7, FP7r2
Tj Max
95°C
95°C
Bundled Cooler
Wraith Spire
—
View Ryzen 7 8700G Details View Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H Details