AMD Ryzen 7 8700F vs Intel Core i7-13700TE Comparison

The Intel Core i7-13700TE and AMD Ryzen 7 8700F represent two distinct philosophies in desktop computing: one is a 35-watt hybrid design from Intel’s 13th Gen Raptor Lake family, and the other is a 65-watt Zen 4 part from AMD’s 8000 series. The benchmark data shows a decisive performance split, with the AMD chip winning 15 of 17 head-to-head tests, but the Intel part claiming two notable victories in specific math workloads. Both processors sit at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, though their average benchmark scores are nearly identical — 31,028 for the Intel and 30,746 for the AMD.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between these two CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700TE has 16 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has 8 cores and 16 threads. Despite the Intel part having double the cores, the AMD chip delivers higher multi-threaded scores in most benchmarks.

Q: Which processor has the higher clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core i7-13700TE has a base clock of 1.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The AMD chip’s higher base clock is particularly significant for sustained workloads.

Q: How do their power envelopes compare?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700TE has a TDP of 35 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a TDP of 65 watts. The Intel part draws substantially less power by design, which is reflected in its lower clock speeds and benchmark scores.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The Intel Core i7-13700TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F supports only DDR5. The AMD chip’s memory bandwidth is listed at 83.2 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure is provided for the Intel part.

Q: What is the biggest single benchmark margin between them?

A: The largest gap is in the PassMark extended instructions test, where the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F scores 28,474 versus the Intel Core i7-13700TE’s 13,750. That is a 51.7% difference in favor of the AMD processor.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700TE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has no integrated graphics (listed as N/A). This makes the Intel part a more flexible option for systems without a discrete GPU.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures and fabrication processes. The Intel Core i7-13700TE uses the Raptor Lake-S design, manufactured by Intel on a 10 nm process node. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F uses the Zen 4 architecture, specifically the Phoenix codename, manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process node. This process advantage gives the AMD chip a smaller die size of 178 mm² versus the Intel part’s 257 mm².

The transistor counts tell a similar story. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F packs 25,000 million transistors, while the Intel Core i7-13700TE has no listed transistor count. Cache hierarchies also differ significantly. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, with 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part’s larger cache pool is notable, but the AMD chip’s higher clock speeds compensate for its smaller caches.

Memory support diverges as well. The Intel Core i7-13700TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F only supports DDR5, also dual-channel, with a rated bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. PCIe connectivity differs too: the Intel part offers Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD chip offers Gen 4 with the same 20 lanes. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

The Intel part features integrated UHD Graphics 770, whereas the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has no integrated graphics at all. The AMD processor is multiplier unlocked, while the Intel part is locked. The AMD chip also uses the newer AM5 socket, compared to Intel’s Socket 1700.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F dominates the Cinebench suite across the board. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD chip scores 2,685 versus the Intel part’s 1,884 — a 29.8% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows a similar 29.9% gap, with AMD at 378 and Intel at 265. These margins persist in Cinebench R20, where AMD leads multi-core 11,191 to 7,853 and single-core 1,579 to 1,108, both again at 29.8% differences. The pattern holds in Cinebench R23: AMD scores 26,646 to Intel’s 18,698 in multi-core and 3,761 to 2,639 in single-core, with the same 29.8% delta.

The PassMark suite reveals the AMD chip’s breadth of superiority. In data compression, AMD scores 378,160 against Intel’s 243,565, a 35.6% lead. Data encryption shows AMD ahead at 22,117 versus 15,006, a 32.2% margin. The extended instructions test is the most lopsided result: AMD’s 28,474 crushes Intel’s 13,750 by 51.7%. Random string sorting also heavily favors AMD, with scores of 45,425 versus 27,307, a 39.9% gap. Multi-threaded PassMark performance gives AMD the win at 30,893 to 22,754, a 26.3% margin.

The Intel Core i7-13700TE claims two victories. In the PassMark find prime numbers test, Intel scores 101 to AMD’s 98, a 3.1% edge. In floating point math, Intel wins 66,421 to 62,629, a 6.1% margin. These are the only tests where Intel comes out ahead, and both are mathematical workloads rather than general-purpose computing tasks.

Other benchmarks underscore AMD’s consistency. In PassMark integer math, AMD wins 100,371 to 97,911, a 2.5% margin. In physics, AMD leads 1,553 to 1,368, an 11.9% gap. Single-thread PassMark tests give AMD the win at 3,872 to 3,422, an 11.6% delta. The overall head-to-head tally is 15 wins for AMD and 2 wins for Intel.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification category. The Intel Core i7-13700TE has 16 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 1.10 GHz for Intel versus 4.10 GHz for AMD, and boost clocks are 4.80 GHz versus 5.00 GHz. TDP ratings are 35 watts for Intel and 65 watts for AMD.

The process node differs: Intel uses 10 nm, while AMD uses 4 nm from TSMC. Die sizes are 257 mm² for Intel and 178 mm² for AMD. Transistors are only listed for AMD at 25,000 million. Cache configurations vary, with Intel offering 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3, versus AMD’s 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3.

Memory support diverges: Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD supports only DDR5. Memory bandwidth is listed only for AMD at 83.2 GB/s. PCIe versions differ: Intel has Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while AMD has Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Integrated graphics are present on Intel (UHD Graphics 770) but absent on AMD. The AMD processor is multiplier unlocked, while the Intel part is not. Sockets are Intel Socket 1700 versus AMD Socket AM5. Release dates are January 2023 for Intel and March 2024 for AMD. The AMD part has a launch MSRP of $270, while the Intel part has no listed launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is the clear winner for almost every performance scenario. Its 29.8% advantage across all Cinebench versions indicates that both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads will complete faster on the AMD chip. The 51.7% lead in extended instructions suggests AMD is particularly strong in workloads that leverage advanced instruction sets, such as cryptography or scientific computing. The 35.6% and 32.2% leads in data compression and encryption, respectively, make the AMD part the better choice for file archiving and data security tasks. Random string sorting at a 39.9% margin points to advantages in data processing and search algorithms.

The Intel Core i7-13700TE wins in two narrow areas. Its 3.1% lead in prime number finding and 6.1% lead in floating point math suggest it holds a slight edge in specific mathematical computations. However, these are isolated wins in a benchmark suite where AMD dominates overall. The Intel part’s 35-watt TDP is also notable for power-constrained systems, though this comes at the cost of significant performance.

For users who need maximum throughput in rendering, encoding, or general productivity, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is the superior choice. Its higher clock speeds and stronger per-core performance overcome the Intel part’s core-count advantage. The only real arguments for the Intel Core i7-13700TE are its lower power draw, integrated graphics capability, and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. In pure performance terms, the data shows AMD winning 15 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, making the Ryzen 7 8700F the definitive performance pick.