AMD Ryzen 7 8700F vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Core i5-14401E
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F vs Intel Core i5-14401E
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data shows a decisive sweep in the head-to-head comparisons. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F wins all six recorded benchmark comparisons against the Intel Core i5-14401E, with a consistent performance advantage that scales across every workload category.
In Cinebench R15 multicore, the AMD part scores 2685 against Intel's 1830, a 46.7% delta. The single-core R15 result follows the same pattern: 378 for AMD versus 258 for Intel, a 46.5% delta. This near-identical percentage gap in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tests suggests the advantage is not merely a function of core count, but reflects a fundamental per-thread performance difference.
Cinebench R20 multicore shows 11191 for the Ryzen 7 8700F versus 7627 for the Core i5-14401E. The single-core R20 score is 1579 against 1076. Both results again show a 46.7% delta, reinforcing the consistency of the performance gap across different rendering workloads.
The flagship Cinebench R23 test, often used as a proxy for sustained all-core rendering performance, shows 26646 for AMD versus 18161 for Intel. The single-core R23 score is 3761 versus 2564. Both deltas sit at 46.7%. This uniform delta across six separate measurements indicates a stable architectural advantage rather than workload-specific quirks.
The AMD processor's overall benchmark percentile sits at 82, meaning it ranks above 82% of all CPUs in the database. The Intel part's percentile is 60. The average benchmark score further illustrates the gap: the Ryzen 7 8700F records 30746, while the Core i5-14401E records 5253. That average is heavily weighted by the AMD part's broader benchmark suite, which includes PassMark and 3DMark results absent from the Intel side of the record.
The AMD chip's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS at a 0.4% lower average score, the Intel Core i5-13600H at 0.6% higher, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T at 0.9% higher, and the Intel Core i7-13700TE at 0.9% lower. This clustering shows the 8700F sits in a competitive band with those processors. The Intel Core i5-14401E's nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 at 0.1% lower, the Intel Core i7-11700B at 0.2% higher, the Intel Core i9-10850K at 0.2% higher, and the Intel Core i5-13400T at 0.8% higher.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F uses Zen 4 architecture on the Phoenix codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It packs 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-14401E uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. It offers 6 cores and 12 threads.
The process node difference is significant: 4 nm versus 10 nm. The AMD chip also carries 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Intel die is larger at 215 mm², but the database does not record a transistor count for it.
Cache layouts differ notably. The AMD part uses 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel part uses 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. Despite having fewer cores, Intel allocates more cache per core and more total L3. The AMD chip compensates with a smaller process node and higher clock speeds.
Clock specifications favor AMD. The Ryzen 7 8700F has a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Core i5-14401E runs at 2.50 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost. The base clock gap is particularly large, a 1.60 GHz difference. The boost clock gap is narrower at 0.30 GHz. Both parts carry a 65 W TDP.
Memory support diverges. The AMD chip supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a recorded bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but no bandwidth figure is recorded. The Intel part supports ECC memory; the AMD part does not.
PCIe connectivity differs in generation and lane count. The AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part includes integrated graphics, specifically UHD Graphics 730, while the AMD part has no integrated graphics.
The socket platforms are incompatible: AMD Socket AM5 versus Intel Socket 1700. The AMD multiplier is unlocked, the Intel multiplier is not. Release dates differ by three months: the 8700F launched on 2024-03-31, the 14401E on 2024-06-30.
The Verdict
The data points in a single direction. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F outperforms the Intel Core i5-14401E in every recorded benchmark comparison. The deltas are large and consistent, sitting at 46.7% in five of six tests and 46.5% in the remaining one. This is not a marginal win; it is a substantial lead across both single-core and multi-core workloads.
The AMD part's 8 cores and 16 threads provide a structural advantage over Intel's 6 cores and 12 threads. Its higher base and boost clocks extend that advantage further. The 4 nm process node gives it an efficiency and density edge over Intel's 10 nm node.
The Intel part does hold advantages in specific areas. It supports ECC memory, which matters for certain workstation or reliability-focused use cases. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5, offering more flexibility in platform choice. It includes integrated graphics, which is useful for systems without a discrete GPU. It uses PCIe Gen 5, which is a newer standard than AMD's Gen 4.
The percentile ranking reflects the overall standing: 82 for AMD versus 60 for Intel. The average benchmark score gap, 30746 versus 5253, is skewed by the differing benchmark suites, but the head-to-head Cinebench results are directly comparable and uniformly favor AMD.
The Core i5-14401E's nearest rivals in the database are older or lower-tier parts like the Core i9-10850K and Core i7-11700B, both from previous generations. The Ryzen 7 8700F sits alongside newer mid-range parts like the Core Ultra 5 225T and Core i5-13600H. This placement reinforces the generational gap between the two processors.
Specification Differences
| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 8700F | Intel Core i5-14401E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock | 4.10 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.70 GHz |
| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Architecture | Zen 4 | Raptor Lake |
| Codename | Phoenix | Raptor Lake-R |
| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |
| Transistors | 25,000 million | Not recorded |
| Die size | 178 mm² | 215 mm² |
| L1 cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |
| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |
| L3 cache | 16 MB shared | 20 MB shared |
| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | Not recorded |
| ECC memory | No | Yes |
| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only) |
| Integrated graphics | N/A | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Production status | Active | Active |
| Release date | 2024-03-31 | 2024-06-30 |
| Launch MSRP | $270 | Not recorded |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads.
Q: How large is the performance gap in Cinebench R23?
A: In Cinebench R23 multicore, the AMD part scores 26646 against Intel's 18161, a 46.7% delta. In single-core, AMD scores 3761 against 2564, also a 46.7% delta.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: No. The Intel Core i5-14401E supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F does not.
Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?
A: The Intel Core i5-14401E includes UHD Graphics 730. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has no integrated graphics.
Q: What memory types does each processor support?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F supports DDR5 only, with a recorded bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14401E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but no bandwidth figure is recorded.
Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14401E is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F wins in every directly comparable benchmark. Its 46.7% advantage in Cinebench R23 multicore and 46.7% in single-core indicates it is the stronger choice for rendering, content creation, and general compute tasks. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a 5.00 GHz boost clock makes it well suited for heavily threaded workloads and for applications that respond to high single-thread performance.
The AMD chip's higher percentile ranking, 82 versus 60, and its placement among newer mid-range rivals in the database further support its position as the better overall performer. Its unlocked multiplier also allows overclocking, which the Intel part does not permit.
The Intel Core i5-14401E wins in platform flexibility. Its support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory gives builders more options depending on motherboard choice and budget. ECC memory support makes it relevant for systems where data integrity is a priority. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a display output without requiring a discrete GPU, which is a practical advantage for basic systems or troubleshooting scenarios.
The Intel chip's PCIe Gen 5 support, with 16 lanes, is a newer standard than the AMD chip's Gen 4 with 20 lanes. For storage or GPU workloads that can leverage Gen 5 bandwidth, this could matter, though the database does not include direct benchmark comparisons for PCIe-dependent tasks.
For users who need raw compute performance, the recorded data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F. For users who need ECC memory, integrated graphics, DDR4 compatibility, or PCIe Gen 5, the Intel Core i5-14401E offers specific features that the AMD part lacks. The benchmark data does not show any workload category where the Intel chip outperforms the AMD chip.