AMD Ryzen 7 8700F vs Intel Core 9 273PTE Comparison

The Intel Core 9 273PTE and AMD Ryzen 7 8700F are both desktop processors that land in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs benchmarked, yet they achieve that standing through very different means. The AMD chip, built on a 4 nm process with Zen 4 architecture, dominates the majority of compute workloads, while the Intel part, a 10 nm Bartlett Lake design, counters with decisive wins in specific mathematical and physics-based tests. The data shows a clear split: AMD holds a near-universal lead in multi-threaded and single-threaded throughput, but Intel's architecture proves superior in prime number generation and physics simulation.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the head-to-head results is the consistency of AMD’s victories. Across the entire Cinebench suite, the Ryzen 7 8700F wins every single test by a nearly identical margin of 23.3%. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD scores 26,646 against Intel’s 20,445; in single-core, it posts 3,761 versus 2,886. This uniformity suggests a fundamental architectural advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk. The same 23.3% delta appears in Cinebench R15 and R20, both multi-core and single-core, indicating that the Ryzen’s higher base clock of 4.10 GHz and boost of 5.00 GHz translate directly into sustained performance across rendering generations.

AMD’s lead extends into PassMark’s integer and encryption tests, though with varying magnitudes. The biggest gap appears in extended instructions, where the Ryzen 7 8700F scores 28,474 against Intel’s 15,952 — a 44% advantage. Data encryption shows a 35.6% edge for AMD (22,117 vs. 14,253), and random string sorting favors AMD by 36.2% (45,425 vs. 28,973). Data compression is similarly lopsided at 31.6% in AMD’s favor (378,160 vs. 258,704). These are not marginal differences; they represent workloads where the Ryzen completes the task in roughly two-thirds of the time Intel requires.

The multi-threaded PassMark score tells a similar story. AMD posts 30,893 to Intel’s 24,054, a 22.1% deficit for the Core 9. Integer math also goes AMD’s way, 100,371 to 82,411, a 17.9% gap. Even floating-point math, traditionally a strong area for Intel, favors AMD, though narrowly: 62,629 vs. 60,673, a 3.1% edge. Single-thread performance in PassMark shows AMD ahead by 11.3% (3,872 vs. 3,433). In total, AMD wins 15 of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks.

Intel’s two wins are narrow but notable. The first is in PassMark’s find prime numbers test, where the Core 9 273PTE scores 142 against AMD’s 98 — a 44.9% advantage. This is the single largest margin in either direction across all tests. The second win comes in PassMark physics, where Intel scores 1,917 to AMD’s 1,553, a 23.4% lead. These wins suggest that Intel’s architecture handles specific integer-heavy loops and physics calculations with greater efficiency, even though it loses the broader integer math test by a wide margin. The prime number result is particularly striking because it runs counter to the overall trend; it is the only test where Intel’s advantage exceeds 25%.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 7 8700F is the clear choice for rendering, content creation, and general productivity. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,646 places it 30% ahead of the Intel Core 9 273PTE’s 20,445, making it the better option for video encoding, 3D rendering, and batch image processing. The 44% lead in extended instructions further cements its position for workloads that use AVX-512 or similar vectorized instruction sets. Data compression and encryption tasks, common in archiving and database operations, also favor AMD by 31.6% and 35.6% respectively, reducing wait times for file packing and secure data handling.

AMD also wins the single-threaded race, which matters for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The 11.3% lead in PassMark single-thread (3,872 vs. 3,433) and the 23.3% advantage in Cinebench R23 single-core (3,761 vs. 2,886) mean that tasks like web browsing, spreadsheet recalculation, and legacy software will feel snappier on the Ryzen. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a 5.00 GHz boost clock delivers higher peak frequency, and the data shows that boost headroom is well-utilized.

The Intel Core 9 273PTE is not without its niches. The 44.9% win in prime number finding suggests an edge in mathematical research, cryptography-related number theory, and any workload that stresses primality testing. The 23.4% win in PassMark physics points to better performance in physics simulation engines used in scientific computing or certain game physics calculations. These are specialized workloads, but for users who run them exclusively, Intel’s advantage is substantial. The Core 9 also offers 12 cores and 24 threads versus AMD’s 8 cores and 16 threads, yet this hardware advantage does not translate into multi-threaded wins — the Ryzen’s superior per-core efficiency overcomes Intel’s core count deficit.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has an average benchmark score of 31,143, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F scores 30,746. Intel leads by 397 points, though both processors sit in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F faster in every Cinebench test?

A: Yes. The Ryzen 7 8700F wins all six Cinebench tests (R15, R20, and R23, both single-core and multi-core) by a margin of 23.3% in each case, with the sole exception of R20 single-core at 23.2%.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two CPUs?

A: The largest gap is in the PassMark extended instructions test, where the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F scores 28,474 versus Intel’s 15,952, a 44% difference in AMD’s favor. Intel’s largest win is 44.9% in the find prime numbers test (142 vs. 98).

Q: Does the Intel Core 9 273PTE beat AMD in any multi-threaded benchmark?

A: No. AMD wins all multi-threaded benchmarks, including Cinebench R23 multi-core (26,646 vs. 20,445) and PassMark multithread (30,893 vs. 24,054). Intel’s wins are limited to prime numbers (single-threaded) and physics tests.

Q: Which CPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F’s 5.00 GHz. However, AMD still wins the single-threaded benchmarks, indicating that clock speed alone does not determine performance.

Q: How do the two processors compare in memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F supports only DDR5 with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. Intel has a 6.4 GB/s advantage in theoretical memory bandwidth.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every fundamental specification. The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has 8 cores and 16 threads. Intel’s base clock is 1.40 GHz, which is significantly lower than AMD’s 4.10 GHz. Intel’s boost clock is 5.50 GHz, exceeding AMD’s 5.00 GHz. Thermal design power differs, with Intel rated at 45W and AMD at 65W. The sockets are incompatible: Intel uses Socket 1700, while AMD uses Socket AM5.

Memory support varies, with Intel accepting both DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD is DDR5-only. Intel’s memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s versus AMD’s 83.2 GB/s. Intel supports ECC memory; AMD does not. PCIe connectivity differs, with Intel offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) and AMD offering Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). Intel includes integrated UHD Graphics 730, while AMD has no integrated graphics. Intel’s multiplier is locked, whereas AMD’s multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is stark. Intel’s Core 9 273PTE is built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s own foundry, using the Bartlett Lake codename. AMD’s Ryzen 7 8700F uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, based on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. AMD’s process node is smaller, which typically allows for higher efficiency and density; the data supports this, as AMD achieves higher performance despite fewer cores. AMD’s die size is 178 mm² with 25,000 million transistors, while Intel’s transistor count and die size are not listed in the data.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. AMD provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and only 16 MB of shared L3. Intel’s L3 cache is more than double AMD’s, yet this does not prevent AMD from winning the majority of benchmarks. The L2 cache per core is also larger on Intel, but AMD’s higher clock speeds and architectural efficiency appear to compensate. Intel’s core count advantage (12 vs. 8) and thread count advantage (24 vs. 16) are offset by AMD’s superior instructions-per-clock and clock frequency.

The production status of both is active, with Intel releasing on 2026-03-08 and AMD on 2024-03-31. AMD’s architecture uses a smaller process node, which is the primary driver of its performance-per-watt advantage. Intel’s use of Bartlett Lake on 10 nm represents a mature process, while AMD’s Zen 4 on 4 nm is a newer design. The integrated graphics on Intel (UHD Graphics 730) versus none on AMD also reflects a design choice: Intel targets systems without discrete GPUs, while AMD assumes a dedicated graphics card will be present. Intel’s launch MSRP is $549, while AMD’s is $270.