AMD Ryzen 7 8700F vs AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D occupy different tiers of the desktop processor market, and the recorded benchmark data reflects a clear performance hierarchy. The 8700F, an 8-core, 16-thread part from the 8000 series, has a substantial body of benchmark results. The 9900X3D, a 12-core, 24-thread part from the 9000 series, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, meaning direct numerical comparisons are impossible. Instead, the analysis must rely on the 8700F's absolute scores and its position relative to other processors in the database.

The 8700F shows strong multi-threaded performance. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,646 points places it firmly in the upper mid-range of desktop processors. The Geekbench multicore result of 13,523 corroborates this, as does the PassMark multithread score of 30,893. The 3DMark 16-thread test, which measures sustained CPU throughput, returned a score of 7,883. The 3DMark max-thread score of 7,861 is nearly identical, indicating that the processor does not gain significantly from additional threads beyond its 16, which is expected given its thread count.

Single-thread performance is equally solid. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,761 and the Geekbench single-core score of 2,290 suggest a well-balanced architecture. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,872 confirms this. In the 3DMark suite, the single-thread score of 1,008 and the 2-thread score of 1,989 show scaling that is close to linear, with the 2-thread result being nearly double the single-thread result.

The 8700F's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its standing. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS, with an average score of 30,879, is 0.4% ahead of the 8700F, essentially a statistical tie. The Intel Core i7-13700TE, averaging 31,028, is 0.9% ahead. Conversely, the Intel Core i5-13600H, with an average score of 30,548, is 0.6% behind, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T, at 30,468, is 0.9% behind. These deltas, all under 1%, indicate that the 8700F sits in a tightly contested performance cluster.

The data shows that the 8700F achieves an average benchmark score of 30,746 and ranks in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. This percentile is a strong indicator of overall capability. The 9900X3D, by contrast, has a percentile of 50, which is the median, but this figure is based on no recorded benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, which is a placeholder rather than a measured result. Therefore, the percentile for the 9900X3D should be treated with caution, as it does not reflect any actual testing.

The 9900X3D does not appear in any head-to-head benchmark table, and the database records zero wins for either processor in direct comparisons. The 8700F, however, has a full suite of scores that can be examined across different workloads. In PassMark tests, the integer math score of 100,371 and the floating point math score of 62,629 highlight strong computational throughput. The extended instructions score of 28,474 shows capable SIMD performance. Data compression in PassMark returned 378,160, while data encryption scored 22,117. These are specialized workloads, but they demonstrate the processor's versatility.

The 8700F's 3DMark results are noteworthy. The 8-thread score of 6,559 is substantially lower than the 16-thread score of 7,883, which shows that the extra threads are being utilized in the higher-thread test. The 4-thread score of 3,839 is roughly half the 8-thread score, again showing near-linear scaling. This consistency across the 3DMark suite indicates that the processor's thread scheduling and cache hierarchy are well-optimized for threaded workloads.

In Cinebench R15, the multicore score of 2,685 and single-core score of 378 follow the same pattern. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score of 11,191 and single-core score of 1,579 are proportionate to the R23 results. These older versions of Cinebench confirm that the 8700F's performance is stable across generations of the rendering workload.

The PassMark physics score of 1,553 and the random string sorting score of 45,425 round out the picture of a processor that handles both integer-heavy and memory-access-heavy tasks competently. The find prime numbers score of 98 is low in absolute terms but is a niche test.

Since the 9900X3D lacks any benchmark data, the head-to-head comparison is one-sided. The 8700F's recorded scores, its 82nd percentile ranking, and its average benchmark score of 30,746 are the only quantitative facts available. The 9900X3D's 50th percentile is listed, but with zero average score and no rivals, it cannot be used as a meaningful comparison point.

The data indicates that the 8700F is a well-rounded desktop processor with strong multi-threaded and single-threaded results. Its nearest rivals all score within 1% of its average, meaning that in real-world use, the differences among these processors would be difficult to perceive. The 9900X3D, on the other hand, has no measured performance data, so any claims about its speed relative to the 8700F would be speculative.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F?

A: The 8700F has an average benchmark score of 30,746 and ranks in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark scores for the 9900X3D, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 8700F compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS?

A: The Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS has an average score of 30,879, which is 0.4% higher than the 8700F's average score of 30,746. This is a negligible difference.

Q: What is the 3DMark 16-thread score of the Ryzen 7 8700F?

A: The 8700F scores 7,883 in the 3DMark 16-thread test, and its 3DMark max-thread score is 7,861.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock, the Ryzen 7 8700F or the Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D?

A: The Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D has a base clock of 4.40 GHz, while the Ryzen 7 8700F has a base clock of 4.10 GHz. The 9900X3D also has a higher boost clock at 5.50 GHz versus 5.00 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D has a TDP of 120 watts.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear choice for users who rely on measured performance: the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is the only one of the two with any benchmark results in the database. Its 82nd percentile ranking and average score of 30,746 place it in the upper tier of processors, and its nearest rivals, all within 1% of its score, confirm that it is competitive with recent mid-range and upper-mid-range parts. The 8700F delivers strong single-thread performance, as shown by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,761, and robust multi-threaded performance, as shown by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,646.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D, despite having 12 cores and 24 threads, higher clocks, and a larger L3 cache, has no recorded benchmark scores. Its 50th percentile ranking is not backed by any measured data, so it cannot be positioned against the 8700F in quantitative terms. The 9900X3D's higher TDP of 120 watts and its embedded market segment suggest it is designed for a different use case, but the database does not provide performance data to support any conclusions about its speed.

For a desktop user seeking a processor with verified performance, the 8700F is the choice. For someone considering the 9900X3D, the absence of benchmark data means that no performance-based recommendation can be made from the database. The 8700F's results are comprehensive and consistent across multiple test suites, including 3DMark, Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark. The 9900X3D offers nothing in the way of measured scores to challenge that.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ substantially in their core and thread counts. The Ryzen 7 8700F has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D has 12 cores and 24 threads. Clock speeds also differ, with the 8700F running at a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The 9900X3D runs at a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

The TDP is a major differentiator. The 8700F has a TDP of 65 watts, whereas the 9900X3D has a TDP of 120 watts. Both processors use the AMD Socket AM5 and support DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bandwidth differs, with the 8700F rated at 83.2 GB/s and the 9900X3D rated at 89.6 GB/s.

ECC memory support is another distinction. The 8700F does not support ECC memory, while the 9900X3D does. The PCIe configuration also differs: the 8700F uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the 9900X3D uses PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes. Integrated graphics are present in the 9900X3D as Radeon Graphics, whereas the 8700F has no integrated graphics.

The release dates are different. The 8700F was released on 2024-03-31, and the 9900X3D was released on 2025-10-06. The 8700F has a launch MSRP of $270, while the 9900X3D has no recorded launch MSRP. Both processors have an unlocked multiplier, and both are listed as active in production status. The part numbers are 100-000001590 for the 8700F and 100-000001368E for the 9900X3D.

Architecture Differences

The architectural differences between the two processors are significant. The Ryzen 7 8700F is based on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix. It belongs to the 8000 series and is generically listed as Ryzen 7 (Zen 4 (Phoenix)). The Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D is based on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Granite Ridge, belonging to the 9000 series and listed as Ryzen Embedded (Zen 5 (Granite Ridge)).

Both processors are manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, but the transistor counts differ. The 8700F has 25,000 million transistors on a die size of 178 mm². The 9900X3D has 16,630 million transistors on a die size listed as 2x 70.6 mm², indicating a chiplet design with two dies. The cache configurations are notably different. The 8700F has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The 9900X3D has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 128 MB of L3 cache. The 9900X3D's L3 cache is eight times larger than the 8700F's, which is a defining feature of the X3D lineup, although the database does not explicitly label it as 3D V-Cache.

The memory architecture is similar, with both supporting DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. However, the 9900X3D has a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s compared to the 8700F's 83.2 GB/s. The PCIe interface also differs, with the 9900X3D supporting PCIe Gen 5 and 24 lanes, while the 8700F supports PCIe Gen 4 and 20 lanes. The 9900X3D includes Radeon Graphics, while the 8700F has no integrated graphics. These architectural differences, combined with the higher core count and clock speeds of the 9900X3D, suggest that it is positioned as a more capable, higher-power processor, but the lack of benchmark data prevents a quantitative assessment of that capability.