AMD Ryzen 7 7735H vs Intel Core i5-13600K Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data paints an unambiguous picture: the Intel Core i5-13600K wins all 15 recorded head-to-head comparisons against the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H. No single test favors the AMD mobile processor. The margins are substantial across both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads, making this less a close contest and more a demonstration of desktop-class performance versus a power-constrained mobile part.

The largest gap appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Intel chip scores 24,221 against the AMD chip’s 10,920. That works out to a 121.8% advantage, meaning the i5-13600K more than doubles the Ryzen 7 7735H’s rendering throughput in this heavily threaded workload. A similar pattern emerges in PassMark’s prime number search, where the Intel processor records 155 versus 59, a 162.7% delta that represents the single biggest percentage lead in the dataset.

Rendering workloads tell a consistent story. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i5-13600K posts 3,642 points against 1,825 for the Ryzen 7 7735H, a 99.6% lead. PassMark physics simulation follows the same trend, with the Intel part scoring 2,258 versus 1,056, a 113.8% advantage. The floating-point math test shows an 83.8% gap, with scores of 90,538 and 49,260 respectively. These are not marginal differences; they represent a full performance tier between the two processors.

Single-threaded results are closer but still favor Intel decisively. Cinebench R23 single-core shows the i5-13600K at 2,000.5 versus 1,536, a 30.2% lead. PassMark single-thread records 4,124 against 3,288, a 25.4% delta. Cinebench R15 single-core narrows further to 287.5 versus 246, a 16.9% gap. Even in lightly threaded tasks, the Intel chip maintains a clear edge, though the margin shrinks compared to multi-core tests.

Memory-sensitive and instruction-heavy workloads reinforce the trend. PassMark data compression shows 476,394 versus 303,502, a 57% lead. Data encryption records 27,075 versus 18,990, a 42.6% advantage. Extended instructions score 28,805 versus 21,214, a 35.8% gap. Random string sorting finishes at 51,073 versus 31,676, a 61.2% delta. Integer math rounds out the list with 122,481 versus 86,788, a 41.1% lead. Across every category, the i5-13600K outperforms the Ryzen 7 7735H by a margin that ranges from roughly a sixth to nearly two-thirds.

The aggregate benchmark data reflects the same hierarchy. The Intel chip carries an average benchmark score of 37,685, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs tracked. The AMD part averages 37,161, sitting at the 85th percentile. The nearest rivals for the i5-13600K include the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 at 37,762 (-0.2%) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H at 37,522 (+0.4%). For the Ryzen 7 7735H, the closest competitors include the Intel Core i7-13700 at 37,135 (+0.1%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 160 at 37,117 (+0.1%). Both processors sit in the same performance tier relative to the broader CPU landscape, but the head-to-head results show the Intel part is consistently faster when directly compared.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core i5-13600K uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. It features 14 cores and 20 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores in a hybrid layout. The die size measures 257 mm². The AMD Ryzen 7 7735H, by contrast, uses Zen 3+ architecture on a 6 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. It packs 8 cores and 16 threads in a conventional homogeneous arrangement, with a die size of 208 mm². The smaller process node gives AMD a density advantage, but the Intel part compensates with more cores and higher clock speeds.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The i5-13600K allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ryzen 7 7735H uses 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip’s larger L2 allocation per core and bigger L3 pool contribute to its superior cache-sensitive performance, particularly in the compression and sorting benchmarks where the gap exceeded 50%.

Memory support also diverges. The Intel part accepts both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD chip supports only DDR5. Both run dual-channel memory buses, but the Ryzen 7 7735H lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, a figure not recorded for the Intel chip. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the i5-13600K offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Ryzen 7 7735H provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The newer PCIe standard on the Intel side enables higher bandwidth for compatible devices, though the AMD part offers more total lanes.

Integrated graphics take different approaches. The Intel chip ships with UHD Graphics 770, while the AMD part includes Radeon 680M. Both support ECC memory, a feature common to workstation-oriented parts. The Intel processor has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking on compatible motherboards, while the AMD chip is locked in this regard.

The socket and platform situation reflects their different market segments. The i5-13600K uses Intel Socket 1700 and is classified as a desktop part. The Ryzen 7 7735H uses AMD Socket FP7 and is a mobile processor. This distinction explains the TDP disparity: the Intel chip draws 125 W, while the AMD chip is rated at 35 W. The Intel processor’s higher power envelope enables its sustained boost clocks of 5.10 GHz versus 4.75 GHz for the AMD part, and its higher base clock of 3.50 GHz versus 3.20 GHz. The release dates also differ, with the i5-13600K launching on 2022-09-26 and the Ryzen 7 7735H arriving on 2023-03-31.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K dominates multi-threaded tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 24,221 versus 10,920 for the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H, a 121.8% lead. PassMark multithread shows 37,680 versus 23,765, a 58.6% advantage.

Q: How do the two chips compare in single-threaded performance?

A: The Intel chip leads here as well, though by smaller margins. Cinebench R23 single-core records 2,000.5 versus 1,536, a 30.2% gap. PassMark single-thread shows 4,124 versus 3,288, a 25.4% delta. Cinebench R15 single-core narrows to 287.5 versus 246, a 16.9% lead.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen 7 7735H has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel part’s additional cores and threads contribute significantly to its multi-threaded benchmark advantage.

Q: Which processor has higher clock speeds?

A: The Intel chip runs at a 3.50 GHz base clock and 5.10 GHz boost clock. The AMD chip runs at 3.20 GHz base and 4.75 GHz boost. The Intel part holds the advantage in both metrics.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K averages 37,685 across all recorded benchmarks, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 7 7735H averages 37,161, sitting in the 85th percentile. Despite the similar averages, head-to-head tests show the Intel part winning every comparison.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K is rated at 125 W, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H is rated at 35 W. The Intel part’s higher power envelope reflects its desktop positioning, while the AMD chip is designed for mobile systems with tighter thermal constraints.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-13600K | AMD Ryzen 7 7735H |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 14 | 8 |

| Threads | 20 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.50 GHz | 3.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 4.75 GHz |

| TDP | 125 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | AMD Socket FP7 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Zen 3+ |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 257 mm² | 208 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB per core | 64 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB per core | 512 KB per core |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB shared | 16 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not recorded | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 lanes | Gen 4, 20 lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 680M |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Release Date | 2022-09-26 | 2023-03-31 |

| Launch MSRP | $319 | Not recorded |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-13600K wins in every measured benchmark category. There is no test in the database where the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H comes out ahead. The Intel chip’s strongest areas are heavily threaded workloads, where its 14 cores and 20 threads overwhelm the AMD part’s 8 cores and 16 threads. Rendering tasks like Cinebench R23 multi-core show the largest absolute gaps, with the Intel part scoring more than double the AMD chip. Physics simulation and prime number computation also show triple-digit percentage leads, reflecting the Intel processor’s superior raw compute throughput.

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735H’s wins are not performance-based but efficiency-based. Its 35 W TDP versus the Intel chip’s 125 W means it draws far less power, making it suitable for laptops and other mobile devices where thermal and battery constraints matter more than peak performance. Its 6 nm TSMC process node is more advanced than Intel’s 10 nm node, and its 208 mm² die is smaller than the Intel chip’s 257 mm². The AMD part also offers more PCIe lanes at 20 versus 16, though on the older Gen 4 standard rather than Gen 5. Its Radeon 680M integrated graphics may be more capable in certain scenarios, though the database does not include iGPU benchmark comparisons.

For users building a desktop system with an unrestricted power budget, the Intel Core i5-13600K is the clear choice. Its benchmark results show it outperforming the AMD mobile chip by 25% to 160% depending on the workload. For users who need a processor for a thin-and-light laptop, the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H’s low power draw and mobile socket make it the only viable option of the two, despite its lower performance. The data suggests these processors are not direct competitors but rather solutions for different market segments, with the Intel part offering desktop-class performance and the AMD part offering mobile efficiency.