AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D vs Intel Core 3 N355 Comparison

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D vs Intel Core 3 N355

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a complete benchmark record for the Intel Core 3 N355, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D has no recorded benchmark scores in this dataset. Therefore, a direct numeric comparison between the two processors is not possible based on recorded data alone. The available measurements for the Intel Core 3 N355 show a multi-threaded PassMark score of 10,174, a single-thread score of 2,153, and an average benchmark score of 13,492. The Ryzen 7 7700X3D holds a percentile rank of 50 among all CPUs, while the Core 3 N355 sits at the 68th percentile, indicating the Intel part ranks higher within the broader database distribution despite lacking head-to-head test results.

The Core 3 N355's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 5,262 and single-core score of 1,039 place it in a specific performance tier. Its PassMark integer math score of 33,894 and floating-point math score of 22,695 demonstrate a balance between integer and floating-point workloads. The data compression score of 117,435 and encryption score of 8,121 show the processor handles data-heavy tasks with distinct efficiency. The PassMark physics score of 625 and extended instructions score of 5,968 round out the recorded workload coverage. The find prime numbers score of 27 is the lowest recorded metric, indicating limited performance in that specific mathematical operation.

The nearest rivals for the Core 3 N355 include the Intel Core i3-12100F with an average score of 13,494 and a delta of 0 percent, the Intel Core i5-9500 at 13,452 with a delta of 0.3 percent, the Intel Core 5 120UL at 13,594 with a delta of -0.8 percent, and the Intel Core i7-1250U at 13,351 with a delta of 1.1 percent. These deltas show the Core 3 N355 sits within a narrow performance band around its closest competitors, with the Core 5 120UL leading by 0.8 percent and the Core i7-1250U trailing by 1.1 percent. The average benchmark score of 13,492 for the Core 3 N355 places it effectively at parity with the Core i3-12100F.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 3 N355?

A: The recorded average benchmark score is 13,492, with a percentile rank of 68 among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 7700X3D has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration for each processor?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700X3D has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 3 N355 has 8 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700X3D boosts to 4.50 GHz, while the Core 3 N355 boosts to 3.90 GHz.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700X3D supports DDR5 only, while the Core 3 N355 supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5.

Q: How does the Core 3 N355 compare to the Intel Core i5-9500 in average score?

A: The Core 3 N355 scores 13,492, which is 0.3 percent higher than the Core i5-9500's 13,452.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 7 7700X3D is positioned for desktop workloads requiring high throughput and low latency. Its 8 cores with 16 threads via simultaneous multithreading allow it to handle parallel tasks more efficiently than the Core 3 N355, which offers 8 threads total with no hyper-threading. The Ryzen part's 96 MB of shared L3 cache is substantially larger than the Core 3 N355's 6 MB shared L3 cache, which directly benefits workloads that repeatedly access large datasets, such as gaming, content creation, and database queries. The Ryzen 7 7700X3D also supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, a figure that is more than double the Core 3 N355's 38.4 GB/s single-channel bandwidth. For users running memory-intensive applications, this bandwidth advantage translates into measurable gains.

The Core 3 N355 wins in power-constrained and mobile environments. Its TDP of 15 watts is dramatically lower than the Ryzen 7 7700X3D's 120 watts, making it suitable for fanless or passively cooled laptops, compact embedded systems, and battery-powered devices. The Intel part supports a broader range of memory types, including DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5, which gives system designers flexibility in choosing cost-effective or low-power memory solutions. The Core 3 N355's integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a graphics solution for basic display output and light media tasks, while the Ryzen 7 7700X3D also includes Radeon Graphics, though the database does not provide comparative graphics performance numbers. The Core 3 N355 also holds a higher percentile rank of 68 versus the Ryzen part's 50, indicating that within the full database of CPUs, the Intel processor's recorded performance places it in a stronger relative position.

For single-threaded responsiveness, the Ryzen 7 7700X3D has a higher boost clock of 4.50 GHz versus 3.90 GHz, which suggests faster per-core execution in lightly threaded applications. However, the Core 3 N355's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,039 provides a concrete data point for its own performance, whereas no comparable score exists for the Ryzen part in this dataset. The Core 3 N355's PassMark single-thread score of 2,153 further quantifies its single-core capability. Without recorded Ryzen benchmarks, any direct single-thread comparison must be inferred from clock speeds and architectural differences rather than measured results.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every fundamental specification. The Ryzen 7 7700X3D uses the AMD Socket AM5, while the Core 3 N355 uses Intel BGA 1264, a soldered mobile package. The Ryzen part has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and boost clock of 4.50 GHz, compared to the Core 3 N355's base clock of 1.90 GHz and boost clock of 3.90 GHz. TDP figures diverge significantly: 120 watts for the Ryzen part versus 15 watts for the Intel part.

Memory support differs in type and channel configuration. The Ryzen 7 7700X3D supports DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and it includes ECC memory support. The Core 3 N355 supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 with a single-channel bus and 38.4 GB/s bandwidth, and it lacks ECC memory support. PCIe connectivity also differs: the Ryzen part uses Gen 5 with 24 lanes, while the Core 3 N355 uses Gen 3 with 9 lanes.

Cache hierarchies are distinct. The Ryzen 7 7700X3D has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 96 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 3 N355 has 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of shared L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Ryzen part's L3 cache is 16 times larger in total capacity, while the Intel part allocates more L1 cache per core and shares its L2 cache across all cores.

Integrated graphics differ: the Ryzen 7 7700X3D includes Radeon Graphics, while the Core 3 N355 includes UHD Graphics 770. The market segments also diverge, with the Ryzen part classified as Desktop and the Intel part as Mobile. Release dates show the Ryzen 7 7700X3D launching on 2026-05-30 and the Core 3 N355 launching on 2025-01-06. The Ryzen part has a launch MSRP of $329, while the Core 3 N355 has no recorded launch MSRP. Both processors have locked multipliers and are currently listed as Active in production status.

Architecture Differences

The Ryzen 7 7700X3D is built on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Raphael, using a 5 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. The transistor count is recorded at 11,270 million with a die size of 71 mm². The Core 3 N355 uses the Twin Lake architecture with the codename Twin Lake, built on a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. Its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The Ryzen 7 7700X3D supports simultaneous multithreading, enabling 16 threads from 8 cores, which is a significant architectural advantage for parallel workloads. The Core 3 N355 does not support multithreading, providing 8 threads from 8 cores. The Ryzen part's generation is listed as "Ryzen 7 (Zen 4 (Raphael))", while the Core 3 N355's generation is listed as "Core 3 (Alder Lake-N)", indicating a different lineage despite the Twin Lake codename.

The Ryzen 7 7700X3D's process node advantage at 5 nm versus 10 nm suggests higher transistor density and potentially better power efficiency per transistor, though the actual TDP of 120 watts versus 15 watts reflects entirely different design goals. The Ryzen part targets high-performance desktop builds with ample cooling and power delivery, while the Core 3 N355 targets low-power mobile and embedded applications. The Ryzen part's PCIe Gen 5 support with 24 lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage, whereas the Core 3 N355's PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes limits expansion options but reduces power consumption and complexity.

The Core 3 N355 includes UHD Graphics 770 as its integrated GPU, while the Ryzen 7 7700X3D includes Radeon Graphics, though the database does not specify the exact Radeon model or execution unit count. The Ryzen part's L3 cache of 96 MB is characteristic of the 3D V-Cache design in the 7000X3D series, though the database does not explicitly label the vCache3d field. The Core 3 N355's smaller 6 MB L3 cache aligns with its efficiency-focused architecture. The memory controller designs also differ fundamentally: the Ryzen part's dual-channel DDR5 interface with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth targets high-throughput scenarios, while the Core 3 N355's single-channel interface with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth prioritizes simplicity and low power draw.