AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Intel Core i7-13705H Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS and Intel Core i7-13705H are both mobile processors, but the benchmark data reveals a clear split: Intel wins the majority of head-to-head tests (9 out of 15), while AMD dominates in specific legacy and security workloads. The overall average benchmark scores are nearly identical, with AMD at 32354 and Intel at 32076, but this masks significant performance variations across different types of tasks. The Intel chip’s higher core count and clock speeds translate into wins in modern multi-core and single-thread tests, while AMD’s architecture shows strengths in specialized instruction sets and data handling.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single victory belongs to AMD in the Cinebench R15 multi-core test, where the Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 1987 against Intel’s 1612, a 23.3% lead. This is a substantial gap, suggesting AMD’s 8-core/16-thread configuration is more efficient in this older rendering workload. AMD also wins the single-core Cinebench R15 test, albeit narrowly, with a score of 234 versus 227, a 3.1% advantage. These results indicate that in legacy Cinebench workloads, AMD’s Zen 3+ architecture holds a clear edge.

However, the tables turn dramatically in the newer Cinebench R23 tests. Intel’s Core i7-13705H scores 15998 in multi-core, which is 25% ahead of AMD’s 11992. The single-core R23 result is even more lopsided: Intel leads 2258 to 1455, a 35.6% advantage. This suggests that Raptor Lake’s design, with its higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus AMD’s 4.70 GHz, is far more effective in modern, heavily threaded and bursty workloads. The data shows that Intel’s 14 cores (likely a mix of performance and efficiency cores) provide a significant scaling advantage in R23.

In PassMark tests, the results are mixed. Intel wins the floating-point math test decisively, scoring 63064 against AMD’s 47533, a 24.6% lead. Intel also outperforms in the physics test, with 1854 versus 1009, a 45.6% margin, and in the prime number finding test, where it scores 116 to AMD’s 56, a 51.7% gap. These three victories highlight Intel’s superior raw computational throughput for scientific and physics-based calculations. Intel also takes the integer math test, but only by 2% (85927 vs 84228), and the multithread test by 6.8% (24460 vs 22801).

AMD’s PassMark wins are concentrated in different areas. The largest is in extended instructions, where AMD scores 20114 versus Intel’s 15810, a 27.2% lead. This indicates AMD’s support for advanced instruction sets is significantly stronger. AMD also wins data encryption by 10.9% (18104 vs 16324) and data compression by 6.9% (292698 vs 273720). The random string sorting test goes to AMD by a slim 3.3% margin (30266 vs 29285). The single-thread PassMark test goes to Intel, with 3483 versus 3184, an 8.6% lead. Overall, Intel’s wins are often larger in magnitude, while AMD’s are more numerous in the encryption/compression niche.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt, fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The Intel Core i7-13705H uses Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process, and packs 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base of 2.40 GHz and a boost of 5.00 GHz. This core count difference is the primary driver of the R23 multi-core results.

Cache configurations also differ substantially. AMD provides 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, with 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel offers 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, with a larger 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel’s larger per-core L2 and total L3 likely contribute to its single-thread advantage in modern tests. The process node difference is notable: AMD’s 6 nm TSMC process is smaller than Intel’s 10 nm, though Intel’s architecture compensates with higher clocks. The die sizes reflect this, with AMD at 208 mm² and Intel at 257 mm².

Memory support differs, as AMD supports only DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory, but AMD lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while Intel does not provide a figure. PCIe support is a major divergence: AMD offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while Intel offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes. Integrated graphics also differ, with AMD using Radeon 680M and Intel using Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The TDP ratings show Intel at 45 W versus AMD’s 35 W, which aligns with Intel’s higher core count and boost clock, but also implies higher power draw.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-13705H has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS boosts to 4.70 GHz.

Q: How do the core counts differ between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i7-13705H has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Which processor wins the most head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i7-13705H wins 9 out of 15 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS wins 6.

Q: What is the difference in the Cinebench R23 single-core scores?

A: Intel scores 2258, which is 35.6% higher than AMD’s 1455.

Q: Does the AMD processor have any benchmark where it wins by a large margin?

A: Yes, AMD wins the Cinebench R15 multi-core test by 23.3%, and the PassMark extended instructions test by 27.2%.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core i7-13705H uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core i7-13705H is the superior choice for most modern, demanding workloads. Its 35.6% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core and 25% lead in R23 multi-core are decisive, as these benchmarks are representative of contemporary rendering and productivity tasks. Intel also wins the majority of PassMark tests, including floating-point math, physics, and multithread, which are critical for scientific computing and content creation. The higher boost clock and larger cache sizes directly support these wins.

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is not without merit, but its victories are concentrated in older benchmarks (R15) and specialized areas like encryption, compression, and extended instructions. The 23.3% win in R15 multi-core suggests that for legacy software, AMD’s architecture is more efficient. However, the overall trend in modern tests favors Intel. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical (32354 vs 32076), but Intel’s wins are in more impactful, current-gen workloads. For a user prioritizing the latest software performance, the Intel Core i7-13705H is the clear pick. For those relying on legacy applications or security-related tasks, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS offers specific advantages.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ significantly in several key specifications. The core count is a major difference, with Intel offering 14 cores versus AMD’s 8. Thread counts follow, with Intel at 20 and AMD at 16. Base clocks differ, with AMD at 3.20 GHz and Intel at 2.40 GHz, but the boost clock flips the advantage, with Intel at 5.00 GHz and AMD at 4.70 GHz. The TDP is also different, with Intel rated at 45 W and AMD at 35 W, reflecting Intel’s higher power envelope.

The process node differs, with AMD using 6 nm and Intel using 10 nm. Cache sizes vary, with Intel having a larger L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB) and larger per-core L2 (2 MB vs 512 KB). Memory support is broader on Intel, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD only supports DDR5. PCIe support differs in generation and lane count: AMD uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while Intel uses Gen 5 with 8 lanes. The integrated graphics are different models, with AMD’s Radeon 680M versus Intel’s Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The sockets are also distinct: AMD uses FP7, while Intel uses BGA 1744. Finally, the Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $502, while AMD does not have a listed launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-13705H is the winner for users who need maximum performance in modern, multi-threaded applications. Its 25% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 35.6% lead in R23 single-core make it ideal for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Intel chip also excels in physics simulations, as shown by its 45.6% win in the PassMark physics test, and in floating-point math, where it leads by 24.6%. For gamers or professionals using current software that leverages high single-thread speeds, Intel’s 5.00 GHz boost clock is a decisive advantage.

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS wins in specific niches that are less common but still relevant. Its 23.3% victory in Cinebench R15 multi-core suggests it is better suited for legacy rendering pipelines. The 27.2% lead in extended instructions indicates superior support for advanced instruction sets, which can benefit certain scientific and cryptographic workloads. AMD also wins data encryption by 10.9% and data compression by 6.9%, making it a strong choice for database management, file archiving, and secure communications. For users running older software or prioritizing security and compression tasks, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS offers measurable advantages, despite losing the overall benchmark count.